Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 1027–1030 | Cite as

Historical descriptions of physicians’ personal pathologies

  • Mohamed Abdelghany
ORTHOPAEDIC HERITAGE
  • 152 Downloads

Abstract

There were many instances in the history of medicine when doctors reported on their suffering from diseases or injuries and how they were managed. Orthopaedic surgery saw many examples of such self-reports. Do surgeons describe their own pathologies in the same way they do those of their patients? Also what did such self reports change in the orthopaedic practice of their times and thereafter? The aim of this paper is to review some historical self-reports in which eminent general and orthopaedic surgeons reported their own orthopaedic ailments. Many such reports broke prevalent myths and made significant changes in the orthopaedic thought and methodology.

Keywords

Orthopaedic history Case reports Classic papers Eponymous fractures 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Professor Abdelsalam Eid, Dr. Aly Ahmed Sayed and Dr. Hussein Elkhayat for reading the manuscript and suggestions given.

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Apley AG (1947) The diagnosis of meniscus injuries: some new clinical methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 29:78–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Charnley J (1963) Tissue reactions to polytetrafluoroethylene. Lancet II:1379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark AT (1896) Colles’ fracture. Can Lancet XXIX(1):10–13Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Colton CL (2008) The history of fracture treatment. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, Krettek (eds) Skeletal trauma: basic science, management, and reconstruction, 4th edn. W. B. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dameron TB (1995) Fractures of the proximal fifth metatarsal: selecting the best treatment option. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 3:110–114PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferreira AP, De Wet IS, Dommisse GF (1978) Fractures and dislocations of the ankle joint. S Afr Med J 54:1095–1100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guthrie D (1945) A history of medicine. Thomas Nelson & Sons Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamby WB (ed) (1960) The case reports and autopsy records of Ambroise Paré, translated from JP Malgaigne’s œuvres complètes d’Ambroise Paré. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hamilton FH (1878) Clinical lecture on fractures of the humerus and Colles’ fracture. Philadelphia Med Times VIII(270):289–293Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jones R (1902) Fractures of the base of the fifth metatarsal bone by indirect violence. Ann Surg XXXV(6):697–702Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knott J (1899) Hey’s internal derangement of the knee joint. Trans R Acad Med Irel XVII:281–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kocher MS (1997) Early limb salvage: open tibia fractures of Ambroise Paré (1510–1590) and Percivall Pott (1714–1789). World J Surg 21(1):116–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mossop EE (1919) Exploration of the knee-joint. S Afr Med Rec XVII(17):257–261Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Packard FR (1921) Life and times of Ambroise Paré (1501–1590). Paul B Hoeber, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Paget S (1897) Ambroise Paré and his times (1510–1590). G. P. Putnam Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pott P (1768) Some few general remarks on fractures and dislocations. Hawes, Clarke & Collins, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Power D (1923) Percivall Pott: his own fracture. Br J Surg 10(39):313–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and TraumatologyQena Health Insurance HospitalQenaEgypt

Personalised recommendations