Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Early anchor displacement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a success and became the mainstream method of reconstruction in recent years. Due to the technical development in shoulder surgery, novel suture anchors and high-strength sutures are widely used providing convincing fixation, however anchor pullout still remains a problem. The aim of our study was to observe early anchor movement on a large patient cohort, and identify clinical, biological and technical variables that can lead to this complication.

Methods

A total of 5,327 patients who had arthroscopic rotator cuff reconstruction for full thickness tear were included in the study. Radiographs taken immediately after surgery were observed and occurrent anchor displacement was recorded. Patient-specific, tendon-specific, bone-specific and implant-specific variables were studied. Any possible relationship between these factors and anchor displacement was investigated.

Results

Early anchor movement occurred in six cases (0.1 %). The involvement of two or more tendons, retraction of the tendon by more than 2 cm and the use of four anchors was associated with higher incidence of anchor displacement, however the difference was not significant.

Conclusions

Based on our study, anchor pullout occurring immediately after surgery is a relatively rare complication. Instead of timing the radiologic examination directly after the procedure, assessment of the anchors’ position four to six weeks after surgery should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sher JS, Uribe JW, Posada A, Murphy BJ, Zlatkin MB (1995) Abnormal findings on magnetic resonance images of asymptomatic shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:10–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tempelhof S, Rupp S, Seil R (1999) Age-related prevalence of rotator cuff tears in asymptomatic shoulders. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 8:296–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gulotta LV, Nho SJ, Dodson CC, Adler RS, Altchek DW, MacGillivray JD (2011) Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at 5 years: part I—functional outcomes and radiographic healing rates. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(6):934–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gulotta LV, Nho SJ, Dodson CC, Adler RS, Altchek DW, MacGillivray JD (2011) Prospective evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs at 5 years: part II—prognostic factors for clinical and radiographic outcomes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(6):941–946

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett WF (2003) Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness supraspinatus tears (small- to-medium): a prospective study with 2- to 4-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19:249–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Millett PJ, Horan MP, Maland KE, Hawkins RJ (2011) Long-term survivorship and outcomes after surgical repair of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(4):591–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bell S, Lim YJ, Coghlan J (2013) Long-term longitudinal follow-up of mini-open rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(2):151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miškulin M, Vrgoč G, Sporiš G, Dulic O, Gavrilovic G, Milanović Z (2014) Single-row arthroscopic cuff repair with double-loaded anchors provides good shoulder function in long-term follow-up. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-014-2557-x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Hapa O, Rapley JH, Barber CA, Bynum JA, Hrnack SA (2011) Biomechanical analysis of pullout strengths of rotator cuff and glenoid anchors: 2011 update. Arthroscopy 27(7):895–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Beavis RC (2009) Cyclic load and failure behavior of arthroscopic knots and high strength sutures. Arthroscopy 25(2):192–199

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Benson EC, MacDermid JC, Drosdowech DS, Athwal GS (2010) The incidence of early metallic suture anchor pullout after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 26(3):310–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Galland A, Airaudi S, Gravier R, Le Cann S, Chabrand P, Argenson JN (2013) Pullout strength of all suture anchors in the repair of rotator cuff tears: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop 37(10):2017–2023

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaar TK, Schenck RC Jr, Wirth MA, Rockwood CA Jr (2001) Complications of metallic suture anchors in shoulder surgery: a report of 8 cases. Arthroscopy 17:31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Downie BK, Miller BS (2012) Treatment of rotator cuff tears in older individuals: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(9):1255–1261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cofield RH, Parvizi J, Hoffmeyer PJ, Lanzer WL, Ilstrup DM, Rowland CM (2001) Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. A prospective long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(1):71–77

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Carbonel I, Martinez AA, Calvo A, Ripalda J, Herrera A (2012) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic repair in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: a prospective randomized clinical study. Int Orthop 36(9):1877–1883

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Lehtinen J, Zurakowski D, Warner JJ (2004) Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality? Am J Sports Med 32(6):1466–1473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Burkhart SS (1995) The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south Texas fence line. Arthroscopy 11(1):119–123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brady PC, Arrigoni P, Burkhart SS (2006) What do you do when you have a loose screw? Arthroscopy 22(9):925–930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim SH, Ha KI (2000) The SMC knot—a new slip knot with locking mechanism. Arthroscopy 16(5):563–565

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Djurasovic M, Marra G, Arroyo JS, Pollock RG, Flatow EL, Bigliani LU (2001) Revision rotator cuff repair: factors influencing results. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:1849–1855

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dezaly C, Sirveaux F, Philippe R, Wein-Remy F, Sedaghatian J, Roche O, Molé D (2011) Arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tear in the over-60s: repair is preferable to isolated acromioplasty-tenotomy in the short term. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(6 Suppl):S125–S130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Beavis RC, Barrera Oro F (2008) Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: update 2008. Arthroscopy 24(8):859–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kannus P, Leppala J, Lehto M, Sievanen H, Heinonen A (1995) A rotator cuff rupture produces permanent osteoporosis in the affected extremity, but not in those with whom shoulder function has returned to normal. J Bone Miner Res 10:1263–1271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Barber FA (2007) Biodegradable shoulder anchors have unique modes of failure. Arthroscopy 23(3):316–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gábor Skaliczki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Skaliczki, G., Paladini, P., Merolla, G. et al. Early anchor displacement after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 915–920 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2690-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-015-2690-1

Keywords

Navigation