Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of implant design on blood metal ion concentrations in metal-on-metal total hip replacement patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Most factors considered to affect blood metal ions following metal-on-metal hip replacement are based on hip resurfacing patients. The study aims were to determine which factors affect blood metal ion concentrations following metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM THR).

Methods

All unilateral MoM THR patients at one centre with whole-blood cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) concentrations measured up to May 2013 were included. Blood sampling was at a mean of 4.5 years (range 1.1–11.8 years) postoperatively.

Results

Of 496 patients (mean age 59.1 years; 52.8 % male), blood metal ions >7 μg/l were observed in 9.7 % (n = 48). Large femoral head sizes (≥38 mm) had significantly higher (p < 0.0001) blood metal ions than smaller sizes (28/36 mm). Corail–Pinnacle implants produced significantly lower blood metal ions compared to other implant designs (p < 0.01 Co and Cr). Univariate linear regression demonstrated the only significant predictors of both blood Co and Cr concentrations were femoral head size (R 2 = 8.6 % Co and R 2 = 3.3 % Cr, both p < 0.0001) and implant design (R 2 = 8.8 %, p = 0.005 Co and R2 = 5.1 %, p = 0.003 Cr). When the three THR implant design groups (Corail–Pinnacle, Synergy, Other) were analysed separately, femoral head size no longer significantly affected blood metal ions in any of the three implant design groups.

Conclusions

Implant design was the most important factor affecting blood metal ion concentrations. We recommend the regularity of follow-up be tailored to survival rates of various MoM THR designs rather than according to femoral head size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bozic KJ, Kurtz S, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP et al (2009) The epidemiology of bearing surface usage in total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 91-A:1614–1620

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom AW (2012) Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet 379:1199–1204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zijlstra WP, van den Akker-Scheek I, Zee MJ, van Raay JJ (2011) No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty? Int Orthop 35:1771–1776

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fink Barnes LA, Johnson SH, Patrick DA Jr, Macaulay W (2014) Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compared with total hip arthroplasty: two to five year outcomes in men younger than sixty five years. Int Orthop 38:2435–2440

  5. Cohen D (2012) How safe are metal-on-metal hip implants? BMJ 344:e1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bolland BJ, Culliford DJ, Langton DJ, Millington JP, Arden NK, Latham JM (2011) High failure rates with a large-diameter hybrid metal-on-metal total hip replacement: clinical, radiological and retrieval analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93-B:608–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Gandhi JN, Sidaginamale R, Mereddy P et al (2011) Accelerating failure rate of the ASR total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93-B:1011–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Langton DJ, Jameson SS, Joyce TJ, Hallab NJ, Natu S, Nargol AV (2010) Early failure of metal-on-metal bearings in hip resurfacing and larger-diameter total hip replacement: a consequence of excess wear. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92-B:38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Howard PW, Blom AW, National Joint Registry for England and Wales (2012) Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 380:1759–1766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Medical and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2010) Medical device alert: ASR™ hip replacement implant manufactured by DePuy International Ltd. MDA/2010/069. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/. Accessed 19 Nov 2014

  11. Medical and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (2012) Medical device alert: all metal-on-metal (MoM) hip replacements. MDA/2012/036. http://www.mhra.gov.uk/. Accessed 19 Nov 2014

  12. Sidaginamale RP, Joyce TJ, Lord JK, Jefferson R, Blain PG, Nargol AV et al (2013) Blood metal ion testing is an effective screening tool to identify poorly performing metal-on-metal bearing surfaces. Bone Joint Res 2:84–95

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Almousa SA, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS (2013) The natural history of inflammatory pseudotumors in asymptomatic patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3814–3821

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ebreo D, Bell PJ, Arshad H, Donell ST, Toms A, Nolan JF (2013) Serial magnetic resonance imaging of metal-on-metal total hip replacements. Follow-up of a cohort of 28 mm Ultima TPS THRs. Bone Joint J 95:1035–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bernstein M, Desy NM, Petit A, Zukor DJ, Huk OL, Antoniou J (2012) Long-term follow-up and metal ion trend of patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 36:1807–1812

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. De Haan R, Pattyn C, Gill HS, Murray DW, Campbell PA, De Smet K (2008) Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90-B:1291–1297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glyn-Jones S, Pandit H, Kwon YM, Doll H, Gill HS, Murray DW (2009) Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 91-B:1566–1574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Grammatopoulos G, Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D et al (2010) Optimal acetabular orientation for hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92-B:1072–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Langton DJ, Joyce TJ, Jameson SS, Lord J, Van Orsouw M, Holland JP et al (2011) Adverse reaction to metal debris following hip resurfacing: the influence of component type, orientation and volumetric wear. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93-B:164–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Langton D (2014) Are metal ion levels a trigger for surgical intervention? In: Jones LC, Greenwald AS, Haggard WO (eds) Metal-on-metal bearings. A clinical practicum. Springer, New York, pp 63–82, Chapter 5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Reito A, Moilanen T, Puolakka T, Pajamäki J, Eskelinen A (2014) Repeated metal ion measurements in patients with high risk metal-on-metal hip replacement. Int Orthop 38:1353–1361

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bernstein M, Walsh A, Petit A, Zukor DJ, Huk OL, Antoniou J (2011) Femoral head size does not affect ion values in metal-on-metal total hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1642–1650

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lavigne M, Belzile EL, Roy A, Morin F, Amzica T, Vendittoli PA (2011) Comparison of whole-blood metal ion levels in four types of metal-on-metal large-diameter femoral head total hip arthroplasty: the potential influence of the adapter sleeve. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 93-A(Supp 2):128–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang EY, McAnally JL, Van Horne JR, Van Horne JG, Wolfson T, Gamst A et al (2013) Relationship of plasma metal ions and clinical and imaging findings in patients with ASR XL metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 95-A:2015–2020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Emmanuel AR, Bergin KM, Kelly GE, McCoy GF, Wozniak AP, Quinlan JF (2014) The effect of acetabular inclination on metal ion levels following metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Der Straeten C, Grammatopoulos G, Gill HS, Calistri A, Campbell P, De Smet KA (2013) The 2012 Otto Aufranc Award: the interpretation of metal ion levels in unilateral and bilateral hip resurfacing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Murray D (1996) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 78-B:185–190

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pandit H, Glyn-Jones S, McLardy-Smith P, Gundle R, Whitwell D, Gibbons CL et al (2008) Pseudotumours associated with metal-on-metal hip resurfacings. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 90-B:847–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86:420–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bland JM, Altman DG (1999) Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 8:135–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pynsent PB, Adams DJ, Disney SP (2005) The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 87-B:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ et al (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 89-B:1010–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R Core Team (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  34. Davda K, Lali FV, Sampson B, Skinner JA, Hart AJ (2011) An analysis of metal ion levels in the joint fluid of symptomatic patients with metal-on-metal hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93-B:738–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Matthies AK, Henckel J, Cro S, Suarez A, Noble PC, Skinner J et al (2014) Predicting wear and blood metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. J Orthop Res 32:167–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 60-A:217–220

    Google Scholar 

  37. National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 10th Annual Report 2013. http://njrcentre.org.uk. Accessed 19 Nov 2014

  38. Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Tetreault M, Paprosky WG, Sporer SM et al (2012) Corrosion at the head-neck taper as a cause for adverse local tissue reactions after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 94-A:1655–1661

    Google Scholar 

  39. Langton DJ, Sidaginamale R, Lord JK, Nargol AV, Joyce TJ (2012) Taper junction failure in large-diameter metal-on-metal bearings. Bone Joint Res 1:56–63

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Garbuz DS, Tanzer M, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2010) The John Charnley Award: metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:318–325

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Beaulé PE, Kim PR, Hamdi A, Fazekas A (2011) A prospective metal ion study of large-head metal-on-metal bearing: a matched-pair analysis of hip resurfacing versus total hip replacement. Orthop Clin N Am 42:251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Brodner W, Grübl A, Jankovsky R, Meisinger V, Lehr S, Gottsauner-Wolf F (2004) Cup inclination and serum concentration of cobalt and chromium after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:66–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fehring TK, Odum S, Sproul R, Weathersbee J (2014) High frequency of adverse local tissue reactions in asymptomatic patients with metal-on-metal THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:517–522

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hart AJ, Satchithananda K, Liddle AD, Sabah SA, McRobbie D, Henckel J et al (2012) Pseudotumors in association with well-functioning metal-on-metal hip prostheses: a case–control study using three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 94-A:317–325

    Google Scholar 

  45. Malek IA, King A, Sharma H, Malek S, Lyons K, Jones S et al (2012) The sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of raised plasma metal ion levels in the diagnosis of adverse reaction to metal debris in symptomatic patients with a metal-on-metal arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 94-B:1045–1050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Matthies AK, Skinner JA, Osmani H, Henckel J, Hart AJ (2012) Pseudotumors are common in well-positioned low-wearing metal-on-metal hips. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1895–1906

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the Arthritis Research Trust for providing one of the authors with funding in the form of a Surgical Research Fellowship.

Conflict of interest

The author or one or more of the authors have received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. In addition, benefits have been or will be directed to a research fund, foundation, educational institution or other nonprofit organisation with which one or more of the authors are associated.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gulraj S. Matharu.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 39 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matharu, G.S., Berryman, F., Brash, L. et al. Influence of implant design on blood metal ion concentrations in metal-on-metal total hip replacement patients. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 1803–1811 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2644-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2644-z

Keywords

Navigation