Advertisement

International Orthopaedics

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 255–261 | Cite as

The ream and run: not for every patient, every surgeon or every problem

  • Frederick A. MatsenIII
Original Paper

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide some essential and basic information concerning the ream and run technique for shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

In a total shoulder arthroplasty, the humeral head prosthesis articulates with a polyethylene glenoid surface placed on the bone of the glenoid. Failure of the glenoid component is recognised as the principal cause of failure of total shoulder arthroplasty. By contrast, in the ream and run procedure, the humeral head prosthesis articulates directly with the glenoid, which has been conservatively reamed to provide a stabilising concavity and maximal glenohumeral contact area for load transfer. While no interpositional material is placed on the surface of the glenoid, animal studies have demonstrated that the reamed glenoid bone forms fibrocartilage, which is firmly fixed to the reamed bony surface. Glenohumeral motion is instituted on the day of surgery and continued daily after surgery to mold the regenerating glenoid fibrocartilage. When the healing process is complete - as indicated by a good and comfortable range of motion - exercises and activities are added progressively without concern for glenoid component failure. 

Results

The experience to date indicates that a technically well done ream and run procedure can restore high levels of comfort and function to carefully selected patients with osteoarthritis, capsulorrhaphy arthroplathy, and posttraumatic arthritis.

Conclusions

Patients considering the ream and run procedure should understand that this technique avoids the risks and limitations associated with a polyethylene glenoid component, but that it requires strong motivation to follow through on a rehabilitation course that may require many months. The outcome of this procedure depends on the body’s regeneration of a new surface for the glenoid and requires rigorous adherence to a daily exercise program. This paper explains in detail the principal factors in patient selection and the key technical elements of the procedure. Clinical examples and outcomes are demonstrated.

Keywords

Shoulder Arthritis Arthroplasty Ream and run Glenoid Failure Age Aged Rheumatology Shoulder function Shoulder scores SST 

References

  1. 1.
    Rozencwaig R, van Noort A, Moskal MJ, Smith KL, Sidles JA, Matsen FA III (1998) The correlation of comorbidity with function of the shoulder and health status of patients who have glenohumeral degenerative joint disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1146–1153PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Braman JP, Falicov A, Boorman R, Matsen FA 3rd (2006) Alterations in surface geometry in retrieved polyethylene glenoid component. J Orthop Res 24:1249–1260. doi: 10.1002/jor.20158 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matsen FA 3rd, Clinton J, Lynch J, Bertelsen A, Richardson ML (2008) Glenoid component failure in total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:885–896. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01263 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papadonikolakis A, Matsen FA III (2014) Metal-backed glenoid components have a higher rate of failure and fail by different modes in comparison with all-polyethylene components: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(12):1041–1047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Papadonikolakis A, Neradilek MB, Matsen FA III (2013) Failure of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review of the English-language literature between 2006 and 2012. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:2205–2212. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00552 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scarlat MM, Matsen FA III (2001) Observations on retrieved polyethylene glenoid components. J Arthroplasty 16(6):795–801PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Weldon EJ III, Boorman RS, Smith KL, Matsen FA III (2004) Optimizing the glenoid contribution to the stability of a humeral hemiarthroplasty without a prosthetic glenoid. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2022–2029PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weldon EJ 3rd, Scarlat MM, Lee SB, Matsen FA III (2001) Intrinsic stability of unused and retrieved polyethylene glenoid components. J Should Elbow Surg 10:474–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matsen FA III, Bicknell RT, Lippitt SB (2007) Shoulder arthroplasty: the socket perspective. J Should Elbow Surg 16(5 Suppl):S241–S247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Matsen FA III, Clark JM, Titelman RM, Gibbs KM, Boorman RS, Deffenbaugh D et al (2005) Healing of reamed glenoid bone articulating with a metal humeral hemiarthroplasty: a canine model. J Orthop Res 23:18–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Matsen FA III, Gupta A (2014) Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run. Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(3):894–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matsen FA III (2014) Ream and run humeral humeral hemiarthroplasty. (2009): Video J Orthop. http://www.vjortho.com/2009/09/ream-run-humeral-hemiarthroplasty/ Accessed October 20. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com/
  13. 13.
    Matsen FA III, Lippitt SB (2012) Current techniques for the ream-and-run arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Essent Surg Tech 2012 2:e20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.ST.L.00009, 1–15Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hacker SA, Boorman RS, Lippitt SB, Matsen Iii FA (2003) Impaction grafting improves the fit of uncemented humeral arthroplasty. J Should Elbow Surg 12:431–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harryman DT II, Sidles JA, Harris SL, Matsen FA III (1992) The role of the rotator cuff interval capsule in passive motion and stability of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:53–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clinton J, Franta AK, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Matsen FA III (2007) Nonprosthetic glenoid arthroplasty with humeral hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty yield similar self-assessed outcomes in the management of comparable patients with glenohumeral arthritis. J Should Elbow Surg 16:534–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gilmer BB, Comstock BA, Jette JL, Warme WJ, Jackins SE, Matsen FA III (2012) The prognosis for improvement in comfort and function after the ream-and-run arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis: an analysis of 176 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:e102. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00486 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lynch JR, Franta AK, Montgomery WH Jr, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Matsen FA III (2007) Self-assessed outcome at two to four years after shoulder hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1284–1292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mercer DM, Gilmer BB, Saltzman MD, Bertelsen A, Warme WJ, Matsen FA III (2011) A quantitative method for determining medial migration of the humeral head after shoulder arthroplasty: preliminary results in assessing glenoid wear at a minimum of two years after hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming. J Should Elbow Surg 20:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saltzman MD, Chamberlain AM, Mercer DM, Warme WJ, Bertelsen AL, Matsen FA III (2010) Shoulder hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming in patients 55 years old or less. J Should Elbow Surg 20:609–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lee MJ, Pottinger PS, Butler-Wu S, Bumgarner RE, Russ SM, Matsen FA III (2014) Propionibacterium persits in the skin despite standard surgical preparation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:1447–1450. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01474 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matsen FA III, Butler-Wu S, Carofino BC, Jette JL, Bertelsen A, Bumgarner RE (2013) Origin of propionibacterium in surgical wounds and evidence-based approach for culturing propionibacterium from surgical sites. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e1811–e1817. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01733 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    McGoldrick E, McElvany MD, Butler-Wu S, Pottinger PS, Matsen FA III (2014) Substantial cultures of Propionibacterium can be found in apparently aseptic shoulders revised three years or more after the index arthroplasty. J Should Elbow Surg. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.05.008 Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pottinger PS, Butler-Wu S, Neradilek MB, Merritt A, Bertelsen A, Jette JL et al (2012) Prognostic factors for bacterial cultures positive for Propionibacterium acnes and other organisms in a large series of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed for stiffness, pain, or loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2075–2083. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00861 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Matsen FA III (2011) Shoulder arthritis/rotator cuff tears: causes of shoulder pain. The latest new information on shoulder arthritis and rotator cuff pathologies. Seattle, WA. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com Accessed October 20, 2014
  26. 26.
    Matsen FA III (2014) Extraordinary rehabilitation effort after a bilateral ream and run procedure. Seattle, WA. Accessed October 20, 2014. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com/2014/09/extraordinary-rehabilitation-effort.html
  27. 27.
    Matsen FA III (2012) Essentials of the ream and run Seattle, WA. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com/2012/12/essentials-of-ream-and-run.html. Accessed October 20, 2014
  28. 28.
    Matsen FA III (2014) Ream and run for posterior instability without glenoid retroversion.; Seattle, WA. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com/2014/09/ream-and-run-for-posterior-instability.html Accessed October 20, 2014
  29. 29.
    Matsen FA III (2013) Activities after ream and run Seattle, WA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J7YraYsg9U, Accessed October 20, 2014
  30. 30.
    Matsen FA III, Warme WJ, Jackins SE (2014) Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad? Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4095-7

Copyright information

© SICOT aisbl 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedics and Sports MedicineUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations