The ream and run: not for every patient, every surgeon or every problem
The purpose of this paper is to provide some essential and basic information concerning the ream and run technique for shoulder arthroplasty.
In a total shoulder arthroplasty, the humeral head prosthesis articulates with a polyethylene glenoid surface placed on the bone of the glenoid. Failure of the glenoid component is recognised as the principal cause of failure of total shoulder arthroplasty. By contrast, in the ream and run procedure, the humeral head prosthesis articulates directly with the glenoid, which has been conservatively reamed to provide a stabilising concavity and maximal glenohumeral contact area for load transfer. While no interpositional material is placed on the surface of the glenoid, animal studies have demonstrated that the reamed glenoid bone forms fibrocartilage, which is firmly fixed to the reamed bony surface. Glenohumeral motion is instituted on the day of surgery and continued daily after surgery to mold the regenerating glenoid fibrocartilage. When the healing process is complete - as indicated by a good and comfortable range of motion - exercises and activities are added progressively without concern for glenoid component failure.
The experience to date indicates that a technically well done ream and run procedure can restore high levels of comfort and function to carefully selected patients with osteoarthritis, capsulorrhaphy arthroplathy, and posttraumatic arthritis.
Patients considering the ream and run procedure should understand that this technique avoids the risks and limitations associated with a polyethylene glenoid component, but that it requires strong motivation to follow through on a rehabilitation course that may require many months. The outcome of this procedure depends on the body’s regeneration of a new surface for the glenoid and requires rigorous adherence to a daily exercise program. This paper explains in detail the principal factors in patient selection and the key technical elements of the procedure. Clinical examples and outcomes are demonstrated.
KeywordsShoulder Arthritis Arthroplasty Ream and run Glenoid Failure Age Aged Rheumatology Shoulder function Shoulder scores SST
- 12.Matsen FA III (2014) Ream and run humeral humeral hemiarthroplasty. (2009): Video J Orthop. http://www.vjortho.com/2009/09/ream-run-humeral-hemiarthroplasty/ Accessed October 20. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com/
- 16.Clinton J, Franta AK, Lenters TR, Mounce D, Matsen FA III (2007) Nonprosthetic glenoid arthroplasty with humeral hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty yield similar self-assessed outcomes in the management of comparable patients with glenohumeral arthritis. J Should Elbow Surg 16:534–538. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.11.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Gilmer BB, Comstock BA, Jette JL, Warme WJ, Jackins SE, Matsen FA III (2012) The prognosis for improvement in comfort and function after the ream-and-run arthroplasty for glenohumeral arthritis: an analysis of 176 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:e102. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00486 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mercer DM, Gilmer BB, Saltzman MD, Bertelsen A, Warme WJ, Matsen FA III (2011) A quantitative method for determining medial migration of the humeral head after shoulder arthroplasty: preliminary results in assessing glenoid wear at a minimum of two years after hemiarthroplasty with concentric glenoid reaming. J Should Elbow Surg 20:301–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Matsen FA III, Butler-Wu S, Carofino BC, Jette JL, Bertelsen A, Bumgarner RE (2013) Origin of propionibacterium in surgical wounds and evidence-based approach for culturing propionibacterium from surgical sites. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95:e1811–e1817. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.01733 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Pottinger PS, Butler-Wu S, Neradilek MB, Merritt A, Bertelsen A, Jette JL et al (2012) Prognostic factors for bacterial cultures positive for Propionibacterium acnes and other organisms in a large series of revision shoulder arthroplasties performed for stiffness, pain, or loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:2075–2083. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00861 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Matsen FA III (2011) Shoulder arthritis/rotator cuff tears: causes of shoulder pain. The latest new information on shoulder arthritis and rotator cuff pathologies. Seattle, WA. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com Accessed October 20, 2014
- 26.Matsen FA III (2014) Extraordinary rehabilitation effort after a bilateral ream and run procedure. Seattle, WA. Accessed October 20, 2014. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com/2014/09/extraordinary-rehabilitation-effort.html
- 27.Matsen FA III (2012) Essentials of the ream and run Seattle, WA. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com/2012/12/essentials-of-ream-and-run.html. Accessed October 20, 2014
- 28.Matsen FA III (2014) Ream and run for posterior instability without glenoid retroversion.; Seattle, WA. http://shoulderarthritis.blogspot.com/2014/09/ream-and-run-for-posterior-instability.html Accessed October 20, 2014
- 29.Matsen FA III (2013) Activities after ream and run Seattle, WA. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7J7YraYsg9U, Accessed October 20, 2014
- 30.Matsen FA III, Warme WJ, Jackins SE (2014) Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad? Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4095-7