Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hip arthroscopy outcomes, complications, and traction safety in patients with prior lower-extremity arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Given the potential for injury due to joint-distraction techniques during hip arthroscopy, this study investigated the outcomes and safety of traction during hip arthroscopy in a series of patients with a prior lower-extremity arthroplasty.

Methods

Nine patients with a prior hip or knee arthroplasty (Group 1) and a matched cohort of nine additional patients with no prior hip surgery (Group 2) who underwent hip arthroscopy with traction between 2011 and 2013 were evaluated. Collected data included traction and operative times, Modified Harris Hip Scores (MHHS), Non-Arthritic Hip Scores (NAHS), and postoperative complications.

Results

Both operative (p = 1) and traction (p = 0.11) times were similar in each group. Each group had a significant improvement in MHHS from baseline to final follow-up: from 39 to 73 (p < 0.001) in Group 1 and from 49 to 75 (p = 0.03) in Group 2. Similarly, the NAHS showed significant improvement in each group from baseline to final follow-up: from 41 to 71 (p < 0.001) in Group 1 and from 48 to 74 (p = 0.02) in Group 2. There was no difference between groups in MHHS or NAHS. There was one postoperative complication in Group 1 (a recurrent labral tear) and no complications from an existing arthroplasty or in Group 2.

Conclusions

Hip arthroscopy in patients with a lower-extremity arthroplasty yields improved short-term clinical outcomes without increased complications. The use of traction during hip arthroscopy is safe in this population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glick JM, Valone F 3rd, Safran MR (2014) Hip arthroscopy: from the beginning to the future-an innovator’s perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(4):714–721. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2859-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lynch TS, Terry MA, Bedi A, Kelly BT (2013) Hip arthroscopic surgery: patient evaluation, current indications, and outcomes. Am J Sports Med 41(5):1174–1189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burnett RS, Della Rocca GJ, Prather H, Curry M, Maloney WJ, Clohisy JC (2006) Clinical presentation of patients with tears of the acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(7):1448–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jerosch J, Neuhauser C, Sokkar SM (2013) Arthroscopic treatment of iliopsoas impingement (IPI) after total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 133(10):1447–1454. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1806-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCarthy JC, Jibodh SR, Lee JA (2009) The role of arthroscopy in evaluation of painful hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):174–180. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0525-8

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Khanduja V, Villar RN (2008) The role of arthroscopy in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. Arthroscopy 24(1):122.e121–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bajwa AS, Villar RN (2011) Arthroscopy of the hip in patients following joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 93(7):890–896

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lahner M, von Schulze PC, Lichtinger TK, Vetter G, Pesendorfer SH, Hagen M, Daniilidis K, von Engelhardt LV, Teske W (2013) The role of arthroscopy in patients with persistent hip pain after total hip arthroplasty. Technol Health Care 21(6):599–606

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Piscitelli P, Iolascon G, Innocenti M, Civinini R, Rubinacci A, Muratore M, D’Arienzo M, Leali PT, Carossino AM, Brandi ML (2013) Painful prosthesis: approaching the patient with persistent pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty. Clin Cases Mineral Bone Metab 10(2):97–110

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wasilewski SA, Frankl U (1989) Arthroscopy of the painful dysfunctional total knee replacement. Arthroscopy 5(4):294–297

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Khanduja V, Villar RN (2006) Arthroscopic surgery of the hip: current concepts and recent advances. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 88(12):1557–1566

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mei-Dan O, Young DA (2012) A novel technique for capsular repair and labrum refixation in hip arthroscopy using the SpeedStitch. Arthrosc Technol 1(1):e107–e112. doi:10.1016/j.eats.2012.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ward JP, Rogers P, Youm T (2012) Failed hip arthroscopy: causes and treatment options. Orthopedics 35(7):612–617. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120621-11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Philippon MJ, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Kuppersmith DA, Maxwell RB, Stubbs AJ (2007) Revision hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1918–1921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sampson TG (2008) Arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 37(12):608–612

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16(4):494–502

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Flecher X, Dumas J, Argenson JN (2011) Is a hip distractor useful in the arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(4):381–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Papavasiliou AV, Bardakos NV (2012) Complications of arthroscopic surgery of the hip. Bone Joint Res 1(7):131–144. doi:10.1302/2046-3758.17.2000108

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Clarke MT, Arora A, Villar RN (2003) Hip arthroscopy: complications in 1,054 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 406:84–88. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000043048.84315.af

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson J, Sadri H, Villar R (2010) Hip arthroscopy technique and complications. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 96(8 Suppl):S68–S76

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lo YP, Chan YS, Lien LC, Lee MS, Hsu KY, Shih CH (2006) Complications of hip arthroscopy: analysis of seventy three cases. Chang Gung Med J 29(1):86–92

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Martin HD, Palmer IJ, Champlin K, Kaiser B, Kelly B, Leunig M (2012) Physiological changes as a result of hip arthroscopy performed with traction. Arthroscopy 28(10):1365–1372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Flierl MA, Stahel PF, Hak DJ, Morgan SJ, Smith WR (2010) Traction table-related complications in orthopaedic surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 18(11):668–675

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan G. Beutel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beutel, B.G., Collins, J.A., Garofolo, G. et al. Hip arthroscopy outcomes, complications, and traction safety in patients with prior lower-extremity arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 39, 13–18 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2479-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2479-7

Keywords

Navigation