Abstract
Purpose
Prior studies have reported improved gait performance and kinematics after total ankle arthroplasty (TAR) compared to ankle arthrodesis (AAD). Given these findings, AAD has been primarily considered as a salvage procedure that may lead to adjacent joint degeneration.
Methods
A total of 101 TAR and 40 screw arthrodeses were enrolled in a retrospective study with a prospectively designed follow-up examination that included gait analysis and outcome assessment with the AOFAS hindfoot score and FAOS questionnaire.
Results
Significant asymmetry in gait and reduced range of motion compared to normal remained after both procedures. Subjective outcome improved after both procedures, and pain was significantly better after TAR. Limited functional gains after TAR and joint degeneration to the same degree after both procedures was seen in the mid-term. Hindfoot fusion seemed to have a greater impact on postoperative function than ankle arthrodesis.
Conclusion
Considering only minor functional gains of TAR compared to AAD the implantation of current TAR designs in large patient series may be questioned.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fuentes-Sanz A, Moya-Angeler J, Lopez-Oliva F, Forriol F (2012) Clinical outcome and gait analysis of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 33:819–827
Wu WL, Su FC, Cheng YM, Huang PJ, Chou YL, Chou CK (2000) Gait analysis after ankle arthrodesis. Gait Posture 11:54–61
Beyaert C, Sirveaux F, Paysant J, Molé D, André JM (2004) The effect of tibio-talar arthrodesis on foot kinematics and ground reaction force progression during walking. Gait Posture 20:84–91
Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold CL, Pontarbelli W (2001) Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 83-A:219–228
Brodsky JW, Polo FE, Coleman SC, Bruck N (2011) Changes in gait following the Scandinavian total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg 93-A:1890–1896
Noelle S, Egidy CC, Cross MB, Gebauer M, Klauser W (2013) Complication rates after total ankle arthroplasty in one hundred consecutive prostheses. Int Orthop 37:1789–1794
Valderrabano V, Nigg BM, von Tscharner V, Stefanyshyn DJ, Goepfert B, Hintermann B (2007) Gait analysis in ankle osteoarthritis and total ankle replacement. Clin Biomech 22:894–904
Piriou P, Culpan P, Mullins M, Cardon JN, Pozzi D, Judet T (2008) Ankle replacement versus arthrodesis: A comparative gait analysis study. Foot Ankle Int 29:3–9
Hahn ME, Wright ES, Segal AD, Orendurff MS, Ledoux WR, Sangeorzan BJ (2012) Comparative gait analysis of ankle arthrodesis and arthroplasty: initial findings of a prospective study. Foot Ankle Int 33:282–289
Rouhani H, Favre J, Aminian K, Crevoisier X (2012) Multi-segment foot kinematics after total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis during relatively long-distance gait. Gait Posture 36:561–566
Flavin R, Coleman SC, Tenenbaum S, Brodsky JW (2013) Comparison of gait after total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 34(10):1340–1348
Henricson A, Carlsson A, Rydholm U (2011) What is a revision of total ankle replacement? Foot Ankle Surg 17:99–102
Davis RB, Õunpuu S, Tyburski D, Gage JR (1991) A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique. Hum Movement Sci 10:575–587
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–502
Krause FG, Windolf M, Bora B, Penner MJ, Wing KJ, Younger ASE (2011) Impact of complications in total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis analyzed with a validated outcome measurement. J Bone Joint Surg 93-A:830–839
SooHoo NF, Zingmond DS, Ko CY (2007) Comparison of reoperation rates following ankle arthrodesis and total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 89-A:2143–2149
Singer S, Klejman S, Pinsker E, Houck J, Daniels T (2013) Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls. J Bone Joint Surg 95(24):e191(1–10)
Ajis A, Henriquez H, Myerson M (2013) Postoperative range of motion trends following total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 34:645–656
Queen RM, De Biasio JC, Butler RJ, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA (2012) J. Leonard Goldner Award 2011: changes in pain, function, and gait mechanics two years following total ankle arthroplasty performed with two modern fixed-bearing prostheses. Foot Ankle Int 33:535–542
Michael JM, Golshani A, Gargac S, Goswami T (2008) Biomechanics of the ankle joint and clinical outcomes of total ankle replacement. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 1:276–294
Conley KA, Geist K, Shaw JN, Labib SA, Johanson MA (2012) The effect of goniometric alignment on passive ankle dorsiflexion. Range of motion among patients following ankle arthrodesis or arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Spec 5:175–179
Sealey RJ, Myerson MS, Molloy A, Gamba C, Jeng C, Kalesan B (2009) Sagittal plane motion of the hindfoot following ankle arthrodesis: a prospective analysis. Foot Ankle Int 30:187–196
Wood PL, Deakin S (2003) Total ankle replacement: the results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg 85-B:334–341
Hendrickx RP, Stufkens SA, de Bruijn EE, Sierevelt IN, van Dijk CN, Kerkhoffs GM (2011) Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int 32:940–947
Labek G, Todorov S, Iovanescu L, Stoica CI, Böhler N (2013) Outcome after total ankle arthroplasty—results and findings from worldwide arthroplasty registers. Int Orthop 37:1677–1682
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braito, M., Dammerer, D., Kaufmann, G. et al. Are our expectations bigger than the results we achieve? A comparative study analysing potential advantages of ankle arthroplasty over arthrodesis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 1647–1653 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2428-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-014-2428-5