Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Open access (OA) publications have changed the paradigm of dissemination of scientific research. Their benefits to low-income countries underline their value; however, critics question exorbitant publication fees as well as their effect on the peer review process and research quality.

Purpose

This study reports on the prevalence of OA publishing in orthopaedic research and compares benchmark citation indices as well as evidence quality derived from OA journals with conventional subscription based orthopaedic journals.

Methods

All 63 orthopaedic journals listed in ISI’s Web of Knowledge Journal Citation Report (JCR) were examined. Bibliometric data attributed to each journal for the year 2012 was acquired from the JCR. Studies that fulfilled the criteria of level I evidence were identified for each journal within PubMed. Individual journal websites were reviewed to identify their open access policy. A total of 38 (60.3 %) journals did not offer any form of OA publishing; however, 20 (31.7 %) hybrid journals were identified which offered authors the choice to publish their work as OA if a publication fee was paid. Only five (8 %) journals published all their articles as OA. There was variability amongst the different publication fees for OA articles. Journals that published OA articles did not differ from subscription based journals on the basis of 2012 impact factor, citation number, self citation proportion or the volume of level I evidence published (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

OA journals are present in orthopaedic research, though in small numbers. Over a third of orthopaedic journals catalogued in the ISI Web of Knowledge JCR® are hybrid journals that provide authors with the opportunity to publish their articles as OA after a publication fee is paid. This study suggests equivalent importance and quality of articles between OA and subscription based orthopaedic journals based on bibliometric data and the volume of level I evidence produced. Orthopaedic researchers must recognize the potential benefits of OA publishing and its emerging presence within the field. Further examination and consensus is required in orthopaedic research to generate an OA system that is robustly regulated and maintains research quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J des Sçavans (1665) ‘L’Imprimeur au lecteur’ i (unpaginated): ‘le dessein de ce Journal estant de faire sçavoir ce qui se passe de nouveau dans la Republique des lettres’

  2. Pallen M (1995) Guide to the Internet. The world wide web. BMJ 311:1552–1556

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. NIH (2013) List of all journals cited in PubMed®. United States National Library of Medicine. Bibliographic Services Division. U.S National Library of Medicine. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/serfile_addedinfo.html Accessed 1 December 2013

  4. Laakso M, Welling P, Bukvova H, Nyman L, Bjork BC, Hedlund T (2011) The development of open access journal publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE 6:e20961

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brand S (1987) The Media Lab: inventing the future at MIT. Viking, New York

  6. Budapest Open Access Initiative (2002)http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read . Accessed 1 December 2013

  7. Bethesda Statement participants (2003) Bethesda Statement on open access publishing. http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4725199/suber_bethesda.htm?sequence=1 . Accessed 1 December 2013

  8. Wolpert AJ (2013) For the sake of inquiry and knowledge–the inevitability of open access. N Engl J Med 368:785–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Noorden R (2013) Open access: The true cost of science publishing. Nature 495:426–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shea N, Prasad V (2013) Open issues with open access publication. Am J Med 126:563–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Doughty K, Rothman L, Johnston L, Le K, Wu J, Howard A (2010) Low-income countries’ orthopaedic information needs: challenges and opportunities. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:2598–2603

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cunningham BP, Harmsen S, Kweon C, Patterson J, Waldrop R, McLaren A et al (2013) Have levels of evidence improved the quality of orthopaedic research? Clin Orthop Relat Res 471:3679–3686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kelly JC, Glynn RW, O’Briain DE, Felle P, McCabe JP (2010) The 100 classic papers of orthopaedic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:1338–1343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy C, Sullivan OP, Bilal M, Walsh A (2013) Ireland’s contribution to orthopaedic literature: A bibliometric analysis. Surgeon 11(5):267–271

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbasi K (2012) The debate around open-access publishing. J R Soc Med 105:185

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lefaivre KA, Shadgan B, O’Brien PJ (2011) 100 most cited articles in orthopaedic surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:1487–1497

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD (2003) Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clauson KA, Veronin MA, Khanfar NM, Lou JQ (2008) Open-access publishing for pharmacy-focused journals. Am J Health Syst Pharm 65:1539–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schroter S, Tite L (2006) Open access publishing and author-pays business models: a survey of authors’ knowledge and perceptions. J R Soc Med 99:141–148

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. O’Dowd A (2013) Experts disagree on whether cost of publishing research will fall, as open access grows, MPs hear. BMJ 346:f2502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Albert KM (2006) Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. J Med Libr Assoc 94:253–262

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wellcome Trust (2013) Position statement in support of open and unrestricted access to published research. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Policy-and-position-statements/WTD002766.htm . Accessed on 1 December 2013

  23. Frank M (2013) Open but not free—publishing in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 368:787–789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ware M, Mabe M (2012) The STM report—an overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. The Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers. http://www.stm-assoc.org/2012_12_11_STM_Report_2012.pdf . Accessed on 1 December 2013

  25. Salem DN, Boumil MM (2013) Conflict of interest in open-access publishing. N Engl J Med 369:491

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haug C (2013) The downside of open-access publishing. N Engl J Med 368:791–793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Data sharing

No additional data is being submitted.

Conflict of interest

All authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, 10th Floor QEQM building, St Mary’s Hospital, London, W2 1NY, UK

    Sanjeeve Sabharwal

  2. Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hillingdon Hospital, London, UK

    Nirav Patel

  3. Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, North West London NHS Trust, London, UK

    Karanjeev Johal

Authors
  1. Sanjeeve Sabharwal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nirav Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Karanjeev Johal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeeve Sabharwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sabharwal, S., Patel, N. & Johal, K. Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 1297–1302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2250-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2250-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation