Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Total hip replacement with a collarless polished cemented anatomic stem: clinical and gait analysis results at ten years follow-up

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to determine outcomes of total hip replacement (THR) with the Lemania cemented femoral stem.

Methods

A total of 78 THR patients were followed and compared to 17 “fit”, healthy, elderly and 72 “frail” elderly subjects without THR, using clinical outcome measures and a portable, in-field gait analysis device at five and ten years follow-up.

Results

Forty-one patients (53 %), mean age 83.4 years, available at ten years follow-up, reported very good to excellent satisfaction. Mean Harris Hip and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were 81.2 and 10.5 points, respectively, with excellent radiological preservation of proximal femur bone stock. Spatial and temporal gait parameters were close to the fit group and better than the frail group.

Conclusions

Lemania THR demonstrated very good, stable clinical and radiological results at ten years in an older patient group, comparable to other cemented systems for primary THR. Gait analysis confirmed good walking performance in a real-life environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF (2002) Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:171–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Espehaug B, Furnes O, Engesaeter LB, Havelin LI (2009) 18 years of results with cemented primary hip prostheses in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register: concerns about some newer implants. Acta Orthop 80:402–412

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray DW, Carr AJ, Bulstrode CJ (1995) Which primary total hip replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:520–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rubin PJ, Rakotomanana RL, Leyvraz PF, Zysset PK, Curnier A, Heegaard JH (1993) Frictional interface micromotions and anisotropic stress distribution in a femoral total hip component. J Biomech 26(6):725–739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bellamy N, Campbell J, Stevens J, Pilch L, Stewart C, Mahmood Z (1997) Validation study of a computerized version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities VA3.0 Osteoarthritis Index. J Rheumatol 24:2413–2415

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rabin R, de Charro F (2001) EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 33:337–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindemann U, Becker C, Unnewehr I, Muche R, Aminin K, Dejnabadi H, Nikolaus T, Puhl W, Huch K, Dreinhöfer KE (2006) Gait analysis and WOMAC are complementary in assessing functional outcome in total hip replacement. Clin Rehabil 20:413–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kyriazis V, Rigas C (2002) Temporal gait analysis of hip osteoarthritic patients operated with cementless hip replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 17(4):318–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Aminian K, Trevisan C, Najafi B, Dejnabadi H, Frigo C, Pavan E, Telonio A, Cerati F, Marinoni EC, Robert P, Leyvraz PF (2004) Evaluation of an ambulatory system for gait analysis in hip osteoarthritis and after total hip replacement. Gait Posture 20:102–107

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ritter MA, Thong AE, Davis KE, Berend ME, Meding JB, Faris PM (2004) Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:438–442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bjørgul K, Novicoff WM, Andersen ST, Brevig K, Thu F, Wiig M, Ahlund O (2010) No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12–14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups. J Orthop Traumatol 11:37–45

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Riede U, Lüem M, Ilchmann T, Eucker M, Ochsner PE (2007) The M.E Müller straight stem prosthesis: 15 year follow-up. Survivorship and clinical results. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127:587–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Acklin YP, Berli BJ, Frick W, Elke R, Morscher EW (2001) Nine-year results of Müller cemented titanium Straight Stems in total hip replacement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 121:391–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nieuwenhuijse MJ, Valstar ER, Kaptein BL, Nelissen RG (2012) The Exeter femoral stem continues to migrate during its first decade after implantation: 10–12 years of follow-up with radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Acta Orthop 83:129–134

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petersen MK, Andersen NT, Mogensen P, Voight M, Søballe K (2011) Gait analysis after total hip replacement with hip resurfacing implant or Mallory-head Exeter prosthesis: a randomised controlled trial. Int Orthop 35:667–674

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nantel J, Termoz N, Vendittoli PA, Lavigne M, Prince F (2009) Gait patterns after total hip arthroplasty and surface replacement arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:463–469

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Perron M, Malouin F, Moffet H, McFadyen BJ (2000) Three-dimensional gait analysis in women with a total hip arthroplasty. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 15:504–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bennett D, Humphreys L, O’Brien S, Kelly C, Orr JF, Beverland DE (2008) Gait kinematics of age-stratified hip replacement patients–a large scale, long-term follow-up study. Gait Posture 28:194–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bennett D, Humphreys L, O’Brien S, Orr J, Beverland DE (2009) Temporospatial parameters of hip replacement patients ten years post-operatively. Int Orthop 33:1203–1207

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chandran P, Azzabi M, Miles J, Andrews M, Bradley J (2010) Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis vs the Charnley cemented hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 25:52–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lachiewicz PF, Messick P (2003) Precoated femoral component in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty: results at a mean 10-year follow-up. J Arthroplasty 18:1–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stucinskas J, Clauss M, Tarasevicius S, Wingstrand H, Ilchmann T (2012) Long-term femoral bone remodeling after cemented hip arthroplasty with the Müller straight stem in the operated and nonoperated femora. J Arthroplasty 27:927–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams HD, Browne G, Gie GA, Ling RS, Timperley AJ, Wendover NA (2002) The Exeter universal cemented femoral component at 8 to 12 years. A study of the first 325 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:324–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Yates PJ, Burston BJ, Whitley E, Bannister GC (2008) Collarless polished tapered stem: clinical and radiological results at a minimum of ten years’ follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:16–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiu KH, Shen WY, Cheung KW, Tsui HF (2005) Primary exeter total hip arthroplasty in patients with small femurs: a minimal of 10 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty 20:275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Hulleberg G, Aamodt A, Espehaug B, Benum P (2008) A clinical and radiographic 13-year follow-up study of 138 Charnley hip arthroplasties in patients 50–70 years old: comparison of university hospital data and registry data. Acta Orthop 79:609–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Professor Christophe Büla, M.D., Service of Geriatric Medicine and Geriatric Rehabilitation, University of Lausanne, for providing the gait analysis results from patients in the rehabilitation centre, and P. Morel for assistance with data collection. We also thank Angelina Poloni for administrative assistance and Dagmar Gross for assistance with preparation of the manuscript. The Interinstitutional Center of Translational Biomechanics (CBT-EPFL, Switzerland) provided funding for this project.

Conflict of interest

B. Jolles is a consultant for Symbios Orthopédie SA. The remaining authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigitte M. Jolles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grzesiak, A., Aminian, K., Lécureux, E. et al. Total hip replacement with a collarless polished cemented anatomic stem: clinical and gait analysis results at ten years follow-up. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 717–724 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2186-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2186-9

Keywords

Navigation