Abstract
Purpose
Arthroscopic lateral clavicle resection (LCR) is increasingly used, compared to an open approach, but literature does not clearly indicate which approach is preferable. The goal of this study was to compare function and pain between patients who underwent lateral clavicle resection using an open approach and patients treated using an arthroscopic approach.
Methods
Patients who underwent LCR between January 2008 and December 2011 were reviewed. After exclusion, 149 shoulders (143 patients) were eligible for analysis: 41 open and 108 arthroscopic. Disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were used to assess shoulder function and pain. Complications, operative time, length of hospitalization and resection distance were compared.
Results
At a mean follow-up of three years, patients in the open group had significantly less pain by VAS (mm) (Mdn 10, IQR 23) compared with arthroscopic patients (Mdn 20, IQR 50) (p = 0.036). Operative time (minutes) was significantly less for the open approach (Mdn 24.0, IQR 12) compared with arthroscopic (Mdn 38.0, IQR 15) (p < 0.001). Resection distance (mm) was larger for the open approach (Mdn 7.1, IQR 7.0) compared with the arthroscopic approach (Mdn 3.2, IQR 3.1) (p = 0.006), but was not associated with outcome. No significant differences were found for DASH score, complication rate or length of hospitalization.
Conclusions
Both arthroscopic and open approaches for LCR provide excellent outcome in patients with acromioclavicular pain. Less residual pain was found for the open approach, which has shorter operating time and is likely more cost effective.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rios CG, Mazzocca AD (2008) Acromioclavicular joint problems in athletes and new methods of management. Clin Sports Med 27:763–788. doi:10.1016/j.csm.2008.06.006
Himal HS (2002) Minimally invasive (laparoscopic) surgery. Surg Endosc 16:1647–1652. doi:10.1007/s00464-001-8275-7
Chronopoulos E, Gill HS, Freehill MT, Petersen SA, McFarland EG (2008) Complications after open distal clavicle excision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:646–651. doi:10.1007/s11999-007-0084-4
Renfree KJ, Wright TW (2003) Anatomy and biomechanics of the acromioclavicular and sternoclavicular joints. Clin Sports Med 22:219–237
Elhassan B, Ozbaydar M, Diller D, Massimini D, Higgins LD, Warner JJ (2009) Open versus arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint resection: a retrospective comparison study. Arthroscopy 25:1224–1232. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.06.010
Flatow EL, Cordasco FA, Bigliani LU (1992) Arthroscopic resection of the outer end of the clavicle from a superior approach: a critical, quantitative, radiographic assessment of bone removal. Arthroscopy 8:55–64
Freedman BA, Javernick MA, O'Brien FP, Ross AE, Doukas WC (2007) Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: comparative results at six months and one year from a randomized, prospective clinical trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:413–418. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2006.10.006
Robertson WJ, Griffith MH, Carroll K, O'Donnell T, Gill TJ (2011) Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: a comparative assessment at intermediate-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med 39:2415–2420. doi:10.1177/0363546511419633
Pensak M, Grumet RC, Slabaugh MA, Bach BR Jr (2010) Open versus arthroscopic distal clavicle resection. Arthroscopy 26:697–704. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2009.12.007
Branch TP, Burdette HL, Shahriari AS, Carter FM, Hutton WC (1996) The role of the acromioclavicular ligaments and the effect of distal clavicle resection. Am J Sports Med 24:293–297
Buttaci CJ, Stitik TP, Yonclas PP, Foye PM (2004) Osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular joint: a review of anatomy, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 83:791–797
Matthews LS, Parks BG, Pavlovich LJ Jr, Giudice MA (1999) Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle resection: a biomechanical analysis on a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 15:237–240
Veehof MM, Sleegers EJ, van Veldhoven NH, Schuurman AH, van Meeteren NL (2002) Psychometric qualities of the Dutch language version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-DLV). J Hand Ther 15:347–354
Eskola A, Santavirta S, Viljakka HT, Wirta J, Partio TE, Hoikka V (1996) The results of operative resection of the lateral end of the clavicle. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78:584–587
Boehm TD, Kirschner S, Fischer A, Gohlke F (2003) The relation of the coracoclavicular ligament insertion to the acromioclavicular joint: a cadaver study of relevance to lateral clavicle resection. Acta Orthop Scand 74:718–721. doi:10.1080/00016470310018261
Edwards SL, Wilson NA, Flores SE, Koh JL, Zhang LQ (2007) Arthroscopic distal clavicle resection: a biomechanical analysis of resection length and joint compliance in a cadaveric model. Arthroscopy 23:1278–1284. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2007.07.004
Neer CS (1983) Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 173:70–77
Rockwood CA, Young DC (1990) Disorders of the acromioclavicular joint. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA (eds) The shoulder. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 413–476
Rowe CR (1984) Trends in treatment of complete acromioclavicular dislocations. In: Bateman JE, Walsh RP (eds) Surgery of the shoulder. RC Decker, Toronto, pp 73–78
Corteen DP, Teitge RA (2005) Stabilization of the clavicle after distal resection: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 33:61–67
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duindam, N., Kuiper, J.W.P., Hoozemans, M.J.M. et al. Comparison between open and arthroscopic procedures for lateral clavicle resection. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 783–789 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2161-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2161-5