Skip to main content

Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. A four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial

International Orthopaedics volume 37, pages 2457–2464 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The treatment of choice for a displaced femoral neck fracture in the most elderly patients is a cemented hemiarthroplasty (HA). The optimal design, unipolar or bipolar head, remains unclear. The possible advantages of a bipolar HA are a better range of motion and less acetabular wear. The aim of this study was to evaluate hip function, health related quality of life (HRQoL), surgical outcome and acetabular erosion in a medium-term follow-up.

Methods

One hundred and twenty patients aged 80 or more with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck (Garden III and IV) were randomised to treatment with a cemented Exeter HA using a unipolar or a bipolar head. All patients were able to walk independently, with or without aids, before surgery. Follow-ups were performed at four, 12, 24 and 48 months postoperatively. Assessments included HRQoL (EQ-5D index score), hip function (Harris hip score [HHS]) and radiological acetabular erosion.

Results

The mean EQ-5D index score was generally higher among the patients with bipolar hemiarthroplasties at the follow-ups with a significant difference at 48 months: unipolar HAs 0.59 and bipolar HAs 0.70 (p = 0.04). There was an increased rate of acetabular erosion among the patients with unipolar hemiarthroplasties at the early follow-ups with a significant difference at 12 months (unipolar HAs 20 % and bipolar HAs 5 %, p = 0.03). At the later follow-ups the incidence of acetabular erosion accelerated in the bipolar group, and there were no significant differences between the groups at the 24- and 48-month follow-ups. There was no difference in HHS or reoperation rate between the groups at any of the follow-ups.

Conclusion

The bipolar HAs seem to result in better HRQoL beyond the first two years after surgery compared to unipolar HAs. Bipolar HAs displayed a later onset of acetabular erosion compared to unipolar HAs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P 3rd, Obremskey W, Koval KJ et al (2003) Internal fixation compared with arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the femoral neck. a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(9):1673–1681

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frihagen F, Nordsletten L, Madsen JE (2007) Hemiarthroplasty or internal fixation for intracapsular displaced femoral neck fractures: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 335(7632):1251–1254

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Rogmark C, Johnell O (2006) Primary arthroplasty is better than internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized studies with 2,289 patients. Acta Orthop 77(3):359–367

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, Swiontkowski MF, Berry DJ, Haidukewych G et al (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(9):2122–2130

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Register SHA. Annual reports, http://www.jru.orthop.gu.se

  6. Enocson A, Hedbeck CJ, Törnkvist H, Tidermark J, Lapidus LJ (2012) Unipolar versus bipolar Exeter hip hemiarthroplasty: a prospective cohort study on 830 consecutive hips in patients with femoral neck fractures. Int Orthop 36(4):711–717

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hedbeck CJ, Blomfeldt R, Lapidus G, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Tidermark J (2011) Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the most elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomised, controlled trial. Int Orthop 35(11):1703–1711

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Garden RS (1961) Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43-B(4):647–663

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatri Soc 23(10):433–441

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64(1):17–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz S, Ford AB, Moskowitz RW, Jackson BA, Jaffe MW (1963) Studies of illness in the aged. the index of adl: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. JAMA 185:914–919

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51(4):737–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37(1):53–72

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Baker RP, Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister GC (2006) Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(12):2583–2589

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ (1996) Unipolar or bipolar prosthesis for displaced intracapsular hip fracture in octogenarians: a randomised prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78(3):391–394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cornell CN, Levine D, O’Doherty J, Lyden J (1998) Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:67–71

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Ward G, Jagger C, Harper WM et al (2001) Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83(2):206–212

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jeffcote B, Li MG, Barnet-Moorcroft A, Wood D, Nivbrant B (2010) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis and clinical assessment of unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for subcapital femur fracture: a randomized prospective study. ANZ J Surg 80(4):242–246

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malhotra R, Arya R, Bhan S (1995) Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in femoral neck fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114(2):79–82

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Raia FJ, Chapman CB, Herrera MF, Schweppe MW, Michelsen CB, Rosenwasser MP (2003) Unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 414:259–265

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Leonardsson O, Kärrholm J, Akesson K, Garellick G, Rogmark C (2012) Higher risk of reoperation for bipolar and uncemented hemiarthroplasty. Acta Orthop 83(5):459–466

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S (2010) Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (6)CD001706

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Avery PP, Baker RP, Walton MJ, Rooker JC, Squires B, Gargan MF et al (2011) Total hip replacement and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck: a seven- to ten-year follow-up report of a prospective randomised controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(8):1045–1048

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen SC, Badrinath K, Pell LH, Mitchell K (1989) The movements of the components of the Hastings bipolar prosthesis. A radiographic study in 65 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71(2):186–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Eiskjaer S, Boll K, Gelineck J (1989) Component motion in bipolar cemented hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Trauma 3(4):313–316

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Phillips TW (1987) The Bateman bipolar femoral head replacement. A fluoroscopic study of movement over a four-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(5):761–764

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Verberne GH (1983) A femoral head prosthesis with a built-in joint. A radiological study of the movements of the two components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 65(5):544–547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wachtl SW, Jakob RP, Gautier E (2003) Ten-year patient and prosthesis survival after unipolar hip hemiarthroplasty in female patients over 70 years old. J Arthroplast 18(5):587–591

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nilsdotter A, Bremander A (2011) Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Lequesne Index of Severity for Osteoarthritis of the Hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) Hip and Knee Questionnaire. Arthritis Care Res 63(Suppl 11):S200–S207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Hans Törnqvist, Department of Orthopaedics, Stockholm South Hospital (Södersjukhuset) and Jan Tidermark, Department of Orthopaedics, Capio St. Görans Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden for their valuable contribution to the study.

This study was supported in part by grants from the Trygg-Hansa Insurance Company, through the regional agreement on medical training and clinical research (ALF) between Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet and the Swedish Research Council (VR).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden

    Christian Inngul, Richard Blomfeldt, Sari Ponzer & Anders Enocson

  2. Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section for Orthopaedics, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Carl-Johan Hedbeck

  3. Unilabs St. Göran Radiology, Capio St. Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Gunilla Lapidus

Authors
  1. Christian Inngul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carl-Johan Hedbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard Blomfeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gunilla Lapidus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sari Ponzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anders Enocson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Inngul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Inngul, C., Hedbeck, CJ., Blomfeldt, R. et al. Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. A four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 2457–2464 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2117-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2117-9

Keywords

  • Arthroplasty
  • Hemiarthroplasty
  • Hip fracture
  • Elderly
  • Osteoporosis