Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Benefits of early intramedullary nailing in femoral metastases

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pathological fractures of the long bones are common complications of metastatic disease; however, the outcome of different surgical techniques for the treatment of these fractures has not been clearly defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in prophylactic and therapeutic intramedullary nailing in femoral metastasic implants.

Methods

Sixty-five patients with metastasis of the femur were analysed retrospectively (37 females; 28 males) between 1995 and 2011 (follow-up 15 months). Forty-four presented with pathological fractures and 21 impending fractures (Mirel ≥7). The operative treatments used were intramedullary fixation with reamed long Gamma nails. The studied parameters were survival, radiological and analytical findings, and functional outcomes.

Results

Prophylactic nailing resulted in immediate postoperative deaths in 5 % vs. 11.4 % in therapeutic, and one technical complication was detected in each group. Among the surviving patients 75.9 % of the fractures and 100 % of impending lesions were able to walk after the operation. The mean survival time was 11 months in the therapeutic (range 1–49) and 14 in the prophylactic group (1–34). The prophylactic intramedullary nails required a lower transfusion rate (1.4 concentrates vs. 3.0), mobilised earlier (day 4.0 vs. 9.7) and needed a shorter hospital stay (eight days vs. 16 days) compared to therapeutic nails (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Femoral intramedullary nailing of metastasic lesions provides satisfactory results both clinically and radiologically. Early treatment of the metastases prevents fractures and gives better results, improving life quality of these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sarahrudi K, Hora K, Heinz T, Millington S, Vécsei V (2006) Treatment results of pathological fractures of the long bones: a retrospective analysis of 88 patients. Int Orthop 30(6):519–524

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrington KD (1997) Orthopedic surgical management of skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80(8 Suppl):1614–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wedin R, Bauer HCF (2005) Surgical treatment of skeletal metastatic lesions of the proximal femur, endoprothesis or reconstruction nail? J Bone Joint Surg [BR] 85-B:1653–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Katzer A, Meenen NM, Grabbe F, Rueger JM (2002) Surgery of skeletal metastases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 122:251–258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Obert L, Jarry A, Lepage D, Jeunet L, Tropet Y, Vichard P, Garbuio P (2005) Centromedullary nailing of the femur for bone metastasis: clinical and radiological evaluation using the Tokuhashi score in 24 patients. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot Dec 91(8):737–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weikert DR, Schwartz H (1991) Intramedullary nailing for impending pathological subtrochanteric fractures. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73-B:668–70

    Google Scholar 

  7. Toma CD, Dominkus M, Nedelcu T, Adbolvahab F, Assadian O, Krepler P, Kotz R (2005) Metastatic bone disease: a 36-year single centre trend analysis of patients admitted to a tertiary orthopaedic surgical department. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot Dec 91(8):737–745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Böhm P, Huber J (2002) The surgical treatment of bony metastases of the spine and limbs. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 84-B:521–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruairi F, Quinlan JF, Stapleton RD, Hurson B, Dudeny S, O’Toole GC (2011) Inter- and intra-observer variability associated with the use of the Mirels’ scoring system for metastatic bone lesions. Int Orthop 35(1):83–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cole AS, Hill GA, Theologis TN, Gibbons CL, Willett K (2000) Femoral nailing for metastatic disease of the femur: a comparison of reamed and unreamed femoral nailing. Injury 31(1):25–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrington KD, Sim FH, Enis JE, Johnston JO, Diok HM, Gristina AG (1976) Methylmethacrylate as an adjunct in internal fixation of pathological fractures. Experience with three hundred and seventy-five cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(8):1047–1055

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pongracz N, Zimmermann R, Kotz R (1988) Orthopaedic management of bony metastases of renal cancer. Semin Surg Oncol 4(2):139–142

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Windhager R, Ritschl P, Ursula Rokus W, Kickinger O, Braun RK (1989) Die Rezidivhäufigkeit von intra- und extraläsional operierten Metastasen langer Röhrenknochen. Z Orthop 127:402–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bouma WH, Mulder JH, Hop WC (1983) The influence of intramedullary nailing upon the development of metastases in the treatment of an impending pathological fracture: an experimental study. Clin Exp Metastasis 1:205–212

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mirels H (1989) Metastasic disease in long bones: a proposed scoring system for diagnosing impending pathological fractures. Clin Ortop 249:256–264

    Google Scholar 

  16. Damron TA, Morgan H, Prakash D, Grant W, Aronowitz J, Heiner J (2003) Critical evaluation of Mirels’ rating system for impending pathologic fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res Oct 415:S201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology at Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Calle Profesor Martín Lagos s/n, 28040, Madrid, Spain

    Camilla Arvinius, Juan Luis Cebrián Parra, Laura Serrano Mateo, Roberto García Maroto, Alberto Francés Borrego & Luis López-Durán Stern

Authors
  1. Camilla Arvinius
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan Luis Cebrián Parra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laura Serrano Mateo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Roberto García Maroto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alberto Francés Borrego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Luis López-Durán Stern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilla Arvinius.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arvinius, C., Parra, J.L.C., Mateo, L.S. et al. Benefits of early intramedullary nailing in femoral metastases. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 129–132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2108-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2108-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation