Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prosthetic radial head stem pull-out as a mode of failure: a biomechanical study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Press-fit cementless radial head implant longevity relies on adequate bone ingrowth. Failed implant osseointegration remains a clinical concern and has been shown to lead to prosthetic failure. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that implants with sufficient initial press-fit stability would be less likely to fail due to implant pull-out, as demonstrated by an increasing amount of energy required to remove the prosthesis from the canal.

Methods

Ten cadaveric radii were implanted with five sizes (6–10 mm in 1-mm increments) of grit-blasted, cementless radial head stems. A customised slap hammer was used to measure the energy required to remove each stem. Stem-bone micromotion was also measured.

Results

The suboptimally sized stem (Max − 1) (i.e. 1 mm undersized) required less energy (0.5 ± 0 J) to pull out than the optimally sized stem (Max) (1.7 ± 0.3 J) (p = 0.008). The optimally sized stem demonstrated greater initial stability (45 ± 7 μm) than the suboptimally sized stem (79 ± 12 μm) (p = 0.004).

Conclusions

This investigation demonstrates the importance of obtaining adequate press-fit stability for the prevention of radial head stem pull-out failure. These data add to the relatively scant knowledge in the literature regarding radial head biomechanics. The energy required to remove a prosthetic radial head ingrowth stem decreases in conjunction with diameter. The use of an inadequately sized stem increases the stem’s micromotion as well as the risk of prosthetic loosening due to pull-out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grewal R, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, Drosdowech DS, King GJ (2006) Comminuted radial head fractures treated with a modular metallic radial head arthroplasty. Study of outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(10):2192–2200. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashwood N, Bain GI, Unni R (2004) Management of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a titanium prosthesis, ligament repair, and early mobilization. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(2):274–280

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moro JK, Werier J, MacDermid JC, Patterson SD, King GJ (2001) Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(8):1201–1211

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burkhart KJ, Mattyasovszky SG, Runkel M, Schwarz C, Küchle R, Hessmann MH, Rommens PM, Lars MP (2010) Mid- to long-term results after bipolar radial head arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 19(7):965–972. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.02

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ling RS (1986) Observations on the fixation of implants to the bony skeleton. Clin Orthop Relat Res 210:80–96

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pilliar RM, Lee JM, Maniatopoulos C (1986) Observations on the effect of movement on bone ingrowth into porous-surfaced implants. Clin Orthop Relat Res 208:108–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Moon JG, Berglund LJ, Domire Z, An KN, O’Driscoll SW (2009) Stem diameter and micromotion of press fit radial head prosthesis: a biomechanical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18(5):785–790. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2009.02.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chanlalit C, Fitzsimmons JS, Shukla DR, An KN, O’Driscoll SW (2011) Micromotion of plasma spray versus grit-blasted radial head prosthetic stem surfaces. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(5):717–722. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.11.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferreira LM, Stacpoole RA, Johnson JA, King GJ (2010) Cementless fixation of radial head implants is affected by implant stem geometry: an in vitro study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25(5):422–426. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Driscoll SW, Herald JA (2012) Forearm pain associated with loose radial head prostheses. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21:92–97. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chanlalit C, Shukla DR, Fitzsimmons JS, An KN, O’Driscoll SW (2011) Effect of hoop stress fracture on micromotion of textured ingrowth stems for radial head replacement. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(7):949–954. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chanlalit C, Fitzsimmons JS, Moon JG, Berglund LJ, An KN, O’Driscoll SW (2011) Radial head prosthesis micromotion characteristics: partial versus fully grit-blasted stems. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 20(1):27–32. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2010.05.030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shukla DR, Fitzsimmons JS, An KN, O’Driscoll SW (2012) Effect of stem length on prosthetic radial head micromotion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(11):1559–1564. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Mayo Foundation. The prosthetic components used in this study were provided by Acumed, LLC. This study was not supported by any outside funding or grants. The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB) that convened on 17 December 2010 approved the project, entitled “Prosthetic Radial Head Stability” (IRB protocol number 01–008186).

Conflict of interest

The authors would like to disclose that the senior author (SOD) and the Mayo Foundation receive royalties from commercial entities related to the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shawn O’Driscoll.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shukla, D., Fitzsimmons, J., An, KN. et al. Prosthetic radial head stem pull-out as a mode of failure: a biomechanical study. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 38, 89–93 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2074-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2074-3

Keywords

Navigation