Skip to main content

Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis

International Orthopaedics volume 37, pages 1755–1763 (2013)Cite this article

Abstract

No consensus had been reached about the optimal method for syndesmotic fixation. The present study analysed syndesmotic fixation based on the highest level of clinical evidence in order to obtain more reliable results. Medline, Embase and Cochrane database were searched through the OVID retrieval engine. Manual searching was undertaken afterward to identify additional studies. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT) and prospective comparative studies were selected for final inclusion. Study screening and data extraction were completed independently by two reviewers. All study characteristics were summarized into a table. The extracted data were used for data analysis. Twelve studies were finally included: six of them were RCTs, two were quasi-randomized studies and four were prospective comparative studies. Four comparisons with traditional metallic screw were identified in terms of bioabsorbable screws, tricortical fixation method, suture-button device as well as non-fixation choice in low syndesmotic injuries. Both absorbable screws and the tricortical fixation method showed almost no better results than traditional quadricortical metallic screw (p > 0.05). Additionally, existing studies could not illustrate their efficiency of reducing hardware removal rate. The suture button technique had significantly better functional score (p = 0.003), ankle motion (p = 0.02), time to full weightbearing (p < 0.0001) and much less complications (p = 0.0008) based on short and intermediate term follow-up data. Transfixation in low syndesmotic injuries showed poorer results than the non fixed group in all outcome measurements, but didn’t reach a significant level (p > 0.05). The present evidence still couldn’t find superior performance of the bioabsorbable screw and tricortical fixation method. Their true effects in decreasing second operation rate need further specific studies. Better results of the suture-button made it a promising technique, but it still needs long-term testing and cost-efficiency studies. The patients with low syndemotic injuries should be well assessed before fixation determination and the indication of screw placement in such conditions needs to be further defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Srikanth B, Selvan TP (2008) Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90:405–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stein G, Eichler C, Ettmann L, Koebke J, Müller LP, Thelen U, Skouras E (2012) Tibiofibular screw fixation for syndesmotic ruptures: a biomechanical analysis. Surg Radiol Anat 34:593–597

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Park JC, McLaurin TM (2009) Acute syndesmosis injuries associated with ankle fractures: current perspectives in management. Bull Nyu Hosp Jt Dis 67:39–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubin JC, Comeau D, McClelland RI (2011) Lateral and syndesmotic ankle sprain injuries: a narrative literature review. J Chiropr Med 10:204–219

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bekerom MP (2011) Diagnosing syndesmotic instability in ankle fractures. World J Orthop 2(7):51–56

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Monga P, Kumar A, Simons A, Panikker V (2008) Management of distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: a snapshot of current practice. Acta Orthop Belg 74:365–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pakarinen H, Flinkkilä T, Ohtonen P, Hyvönen P, Lakovaara M, Leppilahti J, Ristiniemi J (2011) Intraoperative assessment of the stability of the distal tibiofibular joint in supination-external rotation injuries of the ankle: sensitivity, specificity, and reliability of two clinical tests. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2057–2061

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jones MH, Amendola A (2007) Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:173–175

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ramsey PL, Hamilton W (1976) Changes in tibiotalar area of contact caused by lateral talar shift. J Bone Joint Surg 58:356–357

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jordan TH, Talarico RH, Schuberth JM (2011) The radiographic fate of the syndesmosis after trans-syndesmotic screw removal in displaced ankle fractures. J Foot Ankle Sur 50:407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schepers T, Van Lieshout EMM, De Vries MR (2011) Complications of syndesmotic screw removal. Foot Ankle Int 32:1040–1044

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Manzotti A, Baiguini P, Tecchio P (1997) The use of a Kirshner wire in the stabilization of tibial-fibular syndesmosis in type-C ankle fractures according to Weber. Minerva Ortopedica Traumatologica 48(11):425–428

    Google Scholar 

  13. ElRayes M, Hammoda A (2007) Screw versus staple in stabilization of diastasis of tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Foot Ankle Surg 13:5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. De Vil J, Bonte F (2009) Bolt fixation for syndesmotic injuries. Injury 40:1176–1179

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Joukainen A, Partio EK, Waris P, Joukainen J, Kröger H, Törmälä P, Rokkanen P (2007) Bioabsorbable screw fixation for the treatment of ankle fractures. J Orthop Sci 12(1):28–34

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM (2005) Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 431:207–212

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stuart K, Panchbhavi VK (2011) The fate of syndesmotic screws. Foot Ankle Int 32:519–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huber T, Schmoelz W, Bolderl A (2012) Motion of the fibula relative to the tibia and its alterations with syndesmosis screws: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Surg 18(3):203–209

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bekerom MP, Hogervorst M, Bolhuis HW (2008) Operative aspects of the syndesmotic screw: review of current concepts. Injury 39:491–498

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schepers T (2012) Acute distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury: a systematic review of suture-button versus syndesmotic screw repair. Int Orthop 36:1199–1206

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schepers T (2011) To retain or remove the syndesmotic screw: a review of literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:879–883

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Daas A, Zuuren WJ, Pelet S, Noort A, Bekerom MPJ (2012) Flexible stabilization of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: clinical and biomechanical considerations: a review of the literature. Strateg Trauma Limb Reconstr 7:123–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thordarson DB, Samuelson M, Shepherd LE et al (2001) Bioabsorbable versus stainless steel screw fixation of the syndesmosis in pronation-lateral rotation ankle fractures a prospective randomized trial. Foot Ankle Int 22(4):335–338

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kaukonen JP, Lamberg T, Korkala O, Pajarinen J (2005) Fixation of syndesmotic ruptures in 38 patients with a malleolar fracture- a randomized study comparing a metallic and a bioabsorbable screw. J Orthop Trauma 19(6):392–396

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hu YL, Yuan WQ, Wang LF, Liu HF, Jin D (2010) A prospective randomized trial of poly-DL-lactic acid absorbable and metallic screws for treatment of syndesmotic disruptions. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao 30:2360–2362

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sinisaari IP, Lüthje PM, Mikkonen RH (2002) Ruptured tibio-fibular syndesmosis: comparison study of metallic to bioabsorbable fixation. Foot Ankle Int 23(8):744–748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wikerøy AK, Høiness PR, Andreassen GS (2010) No difference in functional and radiographic results 8.4 years after quadricortical compared with tricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 24(1):17–23

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore JA Jr, Shank JR, Morgan SJ (2006) Syndesmosis fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal. Foot Ankle Int 27(8):567–572

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Høiness P, Strømsøe K (2004) Tricortical versus quadricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective, randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Trauma 18(6):331–337

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, Berlet GC (2009) Transosseous fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: comparison of an interosseous suture and endobutton to traditional screw fixation in 50 cases. J Foot Ankle Int 48(6):620–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Naqvi GA, Cunningham P, Lynch B, Galvin R, Awan N (2012) Fixation of ankle syndesmotic injuries: comparison of TightRope fixation and syndesmotic screw fixation for accuracy of syndesmotic reduction. Am J Sports Med 40(12):2828–2835

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Coetzee JC, Ebeling P (2009) Treatment of syndesmoses disruptions: a prospective, randomized study comparing conventional screw fixation vs TightRope fiber wire fixation—medium term results. South Afr Orthop J 8(1):32–37

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pakarinen HJ, Flinkkilä TE, Ohtonen PP (2011) Syndesmotic fixation in supination-external rotation ankle fractures: a prospective randomized study. Foot Ankle Int 32:1103–1109

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kennedy JG, Soffe KE, Dalla Vedova P, Stephens MM, O’Brien T, Walsh MG, McManus F (2000) Evaluation of the syndesmotic screw in low Weber C ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma 14(5):359–366

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Valkering KP, Vergroesen DA, Nolte PA (2012) Isolated syndesmosis ankle injury. Orthopedics 35(12):e1705–e1710

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Pakarinen H (2012) Stability-based classification for ankle fracture management and the syndesmosis injury in ankle fractures due to a supination external rotation mechanism of injury. Acta Orthop Suppl 83(347):1–26

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ebraheim NA, Elgafy H, Padanilam T (2003) Syndesmotic disruption in lowfibular fractures associated with deltoid ligament injury. Clin Orthop Relat Res 409:260–267

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schepers T, van Zuuren WJ, van den Bekerom MP (2012) The management of acute distal tibio-fibular syndesmotic injuries: results of a nationwide survey. Injury 43(10):1718–1723

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stein G, Eichler C, Ettmann L, Koebke J, Müller LP, Thelen U, Skouras E (2012) Tibiofibular screw fixation for syndesmotic ruptures: a biomechanical analysis. Surg Radiol Anat 34(7):593–597

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sasse M, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn DJ (1999) Tibiotalar motion—effect of fibular displacement and deltoid ligament transection: in vitro study. Foot Ankle Int 20(11):733–737

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Olerud C (1985) The effects of the syndesmotic screw on the extension capacity of the ankle joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 104:299–304

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller AN, Paul O, Boraiah S, Parker RJ, Helfet DL, Lorich DG (2010) Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal. J Orthop Trauma 24:12–16

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hsu YT, Wu CC, Lee WC, Fan KF, Tseng IC, Lee PC (2011) Surgical treatment of syndesmotic diastasis: emphasis on effect of syndesmotic screw on ankle function. Int Orthop 35:359–364

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ahmad J, Raikin SM, Pour AE, Haytmanek C (2009) Bioabsorbable screw fixation of the syndesmosis in unstable ankle injuries. Foot Ankle Int 30(2):99–105

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hovis WD, Kaiser BW, Watson JT, Bucholz RW (2002) Treatment of syndesmotic disruptions of the ankle with bioabsorbable screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:26–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Naqvi GA, Shafqat A, Awan N (2012) Tightrope fixation of ankle syndesmosis injuries: clinical outcome, complications and technique modification. Injury 43:838–842

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Boden SD, Labropoulos PA, McCowin P (1989) Mechanical considerations for the syndesmosis screw—a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 71:1548–1555

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bekerom MP, Haverkamp D, Kerkhoffs GM (2010) Syndesmotic stabilization in pronation external rotation ankle fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:991–995

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Park JC, McLaurin TM (2009) Acute syndesmosis injuries associated with ankle fractures: current perspectives in management. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 67(1):39–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schuberth JM, Collman DR, Rush SM, Ford LA (2004) Deltoid ligament integrity in lateral malleolar fractures: a comparative analysis of arthroscopic and radiographic assessments. J Foot Ankle Surg 43(1):20–29

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Michelson JD, Waldman B (1996) An axially loaded model of the ankle after pronation external rotation injury. Clin Orthop 328:285–293

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the national natural science foundation of china (Grant No.81171670).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopaedics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, No.12 Middle Wulumuqi Road, Jingan District, Shanghai, China

    Chen Wang, Xin Ma, Xu Wang, Jiazhang Huang, Chao Zhang & Li Chen

Authors
  1. Chen Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xin Ma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jiazhang Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Chao Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Li Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xin Ma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, C., Ma, X., Wang, X. et al. Internal fixation of distal tibiofibular syndesmotic injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 37, 1755–1763 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1999-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1999-x

Keywords

  • Ankle fractures
  • Syndesmotic injuries
  • Suture button technique
  • Bioabsorbable screw
  • Distal tibio-fibular injury