Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cerclage cable in fracture: frustration or necessity?

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Müller T, Topp T, Kühne CA, Gebhart G, Ruchholtz S, Zettl R (2011) The benefit of wire cerclage stabilisation of the medial hinge in intramedullary nailing for the treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a biomechanical study. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-1204-4

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jiang LS, Shen L, Dai LY (2007) Intramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures with long proximal femoral nail or long gamma nail: technical notes and preliminary results. Ann Acad Med Singapore 36(10):821–826

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roberts CS, Nawab A, Wang M, Voor MJ, Seligson D (2002) Second generation intramedullary nailing of subtrochanteric femur fractures: a biomechanical study of fracture site motion. J Orthop Trauma 16(4):231–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oguz Cebesoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cebesoy, O., Subasi, M. & Isik, M. Cerclage cable in fracture: frustration or necessity?. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 783–784 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1238-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1238-2

Keywords

Navigation