Skip to main content

Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the most elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomised, controlled trial

International Orthopaedics volume 35, pages 1703–1711 (2011)Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

Hemiarthroplasty (HA) is generally considered to be the treatment of choice in the most elderly patients with a displaced fracture of the femoral neck. However, there is inadequate evidence to support the choice between unipolar HA or bipolar HA. The primary aim of this study was to analyse the outcome regarding hip function and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients randomised to either a unipolar or bipolar HA. The secondary aim was to analyse the degree of acetabular erosion and its influence upon outcome.

Methods

One hundred twenty patients with a mean age of 86 years and an acute displaced fracture of the femoral neck were randomly allocated to treatment by either unipolar or bipolar HA. Outcome measurements included hip function (Harris Hip Score, HHS), HRQoL (EQ-5D) and acetabular erosion. The patients were summoned at four and 12 months for follow-up.

Results

There were no significant differences between the groups regarding complications. The HHS scores were equal at both follow-ups, but there was a trend towards better HRQoL in the bipolar HA group at four months, EQ-5D index score 0.62 vs 0.54 (p = 0.06). Twenty percent of the patients in the unipolar HA group displayed acetabular erosion at the 12-month follow-up compared to 5% in the bipolar HA group (p = 0.03), and there were trends towards worse hip function and HRQoL among patients with acetabular erosion compared to those without: HHS scores 70.4 and 79.3, respectively (p = 0.09), and EQ-5D index scores 0.48 and 0.63, respectively (p = 0.13).

Conclusion

Unipolar HA and bipolar HA appeared to produce equivalent clinical outcomes after one year, but the significantly higher incidence of acetabular erosion in the unipolar HA group may imply that bipolar HA should be the preferred treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Blomfeldt R (2006) Surgical treatment of patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Aspects on outcome and selection criteria. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm. http://diss.kib.ki.se/2006/91-7140-801-0/. Accessed 24 January 2011

  2. Garden RS (1961) Low-angle fixation in fractures of the femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br 43:647–663

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tidermark J, Zethraeus N, Svensson O, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S (2002) Quality of life related to fracture displacement among elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. J Orthop Trauma 16:34–38

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhandari M, Devereaux PJ, Tornetta P 3rd, Swiontkowski MF, Berry DJ, Haidukewych G, Schemitsch EH, Hanson BP, Koval K, Dirschl D, Leece P, Keel M, Petrisor B, Heetveld M, Guyatt GH (2005) Operative management of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients. An international survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2122–2130

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rogmark C, Carlsson A, Johnell O, Sernbo I (2002) A prospective randomised trial of internal fixation versus arthroplasty for displaced fractures of the neck of the femur. Functional outcome for 450 patients at two years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:183–188

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Keating JF, Grant A, Masson M, Scott NW, Forbes JF (2006) Randomized comparison of reduction and fixation, bipolar hemiarthroplasty, and total hip arthroplasty Treatment of displaced intracapsular hip fractures in healthy older patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:249–260

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Söderqvist A, Tidermark J (2005) Comparison of internal fixation with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures. Randomized, controlled trial performed at four years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:1680–1688

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker RP, Squires B, Gargan MF, Bannister GC (2006) Total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty in mobile, independent patients with a displaced intracapsular fracture of the femoral neck. A randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2583–2589

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Varley J, Parker MJ (2004) Stability of hip hemiarthroplasties. Int Orthop 28:274–277

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker MJ, Gurusamy KS, Azegami S (2010) Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 6:CD001706

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parker MI, Pryor G, Gurusamy K (2010) Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures: a randomised controlled trial in 400 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 92:116–122

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cornell CN, Levine D, O'Doherty J, Lyden J (1998) Unipolar versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 348:67–71

    Google Scholar 

  13. Davison JN, Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Ward G, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ (2001) Treatment for displaced intracapsular fracture of the proximal femur. A prospective, randomised trial in patients aged 65 to 79 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:206–212

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Raia FJ, Chapman CB, Herrera MF, Schweppe MW, Michelsen CB, Rosenwasser MP (2003) Unipolar or bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures in the elderly? Clin Orthop Relat Res 259–265

  15. Calder SJ, Anderson GH, Jagger C, Harper WM, Gregg PJ (1996) Unipolar or bipolar prosthesis for displaced intracapsular hip fracture in octogenarians: a randomised prospective study [see comments]. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:391–394

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23:433–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Owens WD, Felts JA, Spitznagel EL Jr (1978) ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings. Anesthesiology 49:239–243

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz S, Ford A, Moskowitz R, Jackson B, Jaffe M (1963) Studies of illness in the aged The index of ADL: A standardized measure of biological and psychological function. JAMA 185:94–99

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brooks R (1996) EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 37:53–72

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51:737–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tidermark J, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Söderqvist A, Törnkvist H (2003) Internal fixation compared with total hip replacement for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly. A randomised, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:380–388

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hedbeck C, Enocson A, Lapidus G, Blomfeldt R, Törnkvist H, Ponzer S, Tidermark J (2011) Comparison of bipolar hemiarthroplasty with total hip arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures. A concise four-year-follow-up of a randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am (in press)

  24. SCB (2010) Statistics Sweden (in Swedish). http://www.scb.se. Accessed 24 January 2011

  25. Phillips TW (1987) The Bateman bipolar femoral head replacement. A fluoroscopic study of movement over a four-year period. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:761–764

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Verberne GH (1983) A femoral head prosthesis with a built-in joint. A radiological study of the movements of the two components. J Bone Joint Surg Br 65:544–547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Coin A, Sergi G, Beninca P, Lupoli L, Cinti G, Ferrara L, Benedetti G, Tomasi G, Pisent C, Enzi G (2000) Bone mineral density and body composition in underweight and normal elderly subjects. Osteoporos Int 11:1043–1050

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Enocson A, Tidermark J, Törnkvist H, Lapidus LJ (2008) Dislocation of hemiarthroplasty after femoral neck fracture: better outcome after the anterolateral approach in a prospective cohort study on 739 consecutive hips. Acta Orthop 79:211–217

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Söderqvist A, Ekström W, Ponzer S, Pettersson H, Cederholm T, Dalen N, Hedström M, Tidermark J (2009) Prediction of mortality in elderly patients with hip fractures: a two-year prospective study of 1,944 patients. Gerontology 55:496–504

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Burström K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F (2001) Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 10:621–635

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Marsh J, Bryant D, MacDonald SJ (2009) Older patients can accurately recall their preoperative health status six weeks following total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:2827–2837

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by grants from the Trygg-Hansa Insurance Company and through the Regional Agreement on Medical Training and Clinical Research (ALF) between the Stockholm County Council and Karolinska Institutet.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Section of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden

    Carl Johan Hedbeck, Richard Blomfeldt, Hans Törnkvist, Sari Ponzer & Jan Tidermark

  2. Unilabs St. Göran Radiology, Capio St. Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Gunilla Lapidus

  3. Department of Orthopaedics, Capio St. Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jan Tidermark

  4. Department of Orthopaedics, Södersjukhuset, SE-118 83, Stockholm, Sweden

    Carl Johan Hedbeck

Authors
  1. Carl Johan Hedbeck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Richard Blomfeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gunilla Lapidus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans Törnkvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Sari Ponzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jan Tidermark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carl Johan Hedbeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hedbeck, C.J., Blomfeldt, R., Lapidus, G. et al. Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the most elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomised, controlled trial. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 1703–1711 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1213-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1213-y

Keywords

  • Displace Femoral Neck Fracture
  • Bipolar Group
  • Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire
  • Bipolar Prosthesis
  • Acetabular Erosion