Abstract
Although there is general consensus about the efficacy of total hip replacement (THR) in young patients, the most appropriate bearings in young patients remain highly debated. The three most popular bearings in use include metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), metal-on-metal (MOM) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature to summarise the best available evidence on relative success of the three most popular bearings used in THR in young active patients. Our findings support the use of MOM bearings in the management of the young arthritic hip. These findings, largely based upon observational studies, should be taken in the context of the limitations of such non-randomised study designs.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Yoon KS, Koo KH, Kim JW, Nam KW, Kim HJ (2006) Contemporary alumina on alumina total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 78B:70–75
Wangen H, Lereim P, Holm I, Gunderson R, Reikeras O (2008) Hip replacement in patients younger than 30 years: excellent ten to 16-year follow-up results with a HA-coated stem. Int Orthop 32(2):203–208
Bizot P, Banallec L, Sedel L, Nizard R (2000) Alumina-on-alumina total hip prostheses in patients 40 years of age or younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:68–76
Nich C, Sari Ali EH, Hannouche D, Nizard R, Witvoet J, Sedel L, Dorlot M, Bizot P (2003) Long-term results of alumina-on-alumina hip replacement for osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:102–111
Chan HY, Koo KH, Jeong ST, Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Kim HJ (2007) Cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years—a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 22:184–188
Robertson A, Lavalette D, Morgan S, Angus PD (2005) The hydroxyapatite-coated JRI-furlong hip outcome in patients under the age of 55 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:12–15
Stuart A, Ord JK (1994) Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, 6th edn. Edward Arnold, London
DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188
Egger M (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 13;315(7109):629–634
Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JAC (2006) A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med 25(20):3443–3457
Kim SY, Kyung HS, Chulihn J, Cho MR, Hoikoo K, Kim CY (2004) Cementless metasul metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2475–2481
Eskelinenl A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P (2006) Uncemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in young patients. A mid- to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Replacement Register. Acta Orthop 77(1):57–70
Kim SY, Kyung HS, Chulihn J, Cho MR, Hoikoo K, Kim CY (2007) Cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 22(2):184–188
Archibeck MJ, Surdam JW, Schultz SC Jr, Junick DW, White RE (2006) Cementless total hip replacement in patients 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 21(4):476–483
Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM Jr (2007) Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 78(3):315–326
Baek SH, Kim SY (2008) Cementless total hip replacement with alumina bearings in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(6):1314–1320
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shetty, V., Shitole, B., Shetty, G. et al. Optimal bearing surfaces for total hip replacement in the young patient: a meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 1281–1287 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1104-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1104-7