Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal bearing surfaces for total hip replacement in the young patient: a meta-analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although there is general consensus about the efficacy of total hip replacement (THR) in young patients, the most appropriate bearings in young patients remain highly debated. The three most popular bearings in use include metal-on-polyethylene (MOP), metal-on-metal (MOM) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature to summarise the best available evidence on relative success of the three most popular bearings used in THR in young active patients. Our findings support the use of MOM bearings in the management of the young arthritic hip. These findings, largely based upon observational studies, should be taken in the context of the limitations of such non-randomised study designs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Yoon KS, Koo KH, Kim JW, Nam KW, Kim HJ (2006) Contemporary alumina on alumina total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 78B:70–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wangen H, Lereim P, Holm I, Gunderson R, Reikeras O (2008) Hip replacement in patients younger than 30 years: excellent ten to 16-year follow-up results with a HA-coated stem. Int Orthop 32(2):203–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bizot P, Banallec L, Sedel L, Nizard R (2000) Alumina-on-alumina total hip prostheses in patients 40 years of age or younger. Clin Orthop Relat Res 379:68–76

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nich C, Sari Ali EH, Hannouche D, Nizard R, Witvoet J, Sedel L, Dorlot M, Bizot P (2003) Long-term results of alumina-on-alumina hip replacement for osteonecrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:102–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan HY, Koo KH, Jeong ST, Yoo JJ, Kim YM, Kim HJ (2007) Cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years—a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 22:184–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Robertson A, Lavalette D, Morgan S, Angus PD (2005) The hydroxyapatite-coated JRI-furlong hip outcome in patients under the age of 55 years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:12–15

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stuart A, Ord JK (1994) Kendall's advanced theory of statistics, 6th edn. Edward Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7(3):177–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Egger M (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 13;315(7109):629–634

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harbord RM, Egger M, Sterne JAC (2006) A modified test for small-study effects in meta-analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints. Stat Med 25(20):3443–3457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SY, Kyung HS, Chulihn J, Cho MR, Hoikoo K, Kim CY (2004) Cementless metasul metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2475–2481

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eskelinenl A, Remes V, Helenius I, Pulkkinen P, Nevalainen J, Paavolainen P (2006) Uncemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in young patients. A mid- to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Replacement Register. Acta Orthop 77(1):57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim SY, Kyung HS, Chulihn J, Cho MR, Hoikoo K, Kim CY (2007) Cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip replacement in patients younger than 50 years: a 5-year minimum follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 22(2):184–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Archibeck MJ, Surdam JW, Schultz SC Jr, Junick DW, White RE (2006) Cementless total hip replacement in patients 50 years or younger. J Arthroplasty 21(4):476–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Morshed S, Bozic KJ, Ries MD, Malchau H, Colford JM Jr (2007) Comparison of cemented and uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Acta Orthop 78(3):315–326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Baek SH, Kim SY (2008) Cementless total hip replacement with alumina bearings in patients younger than fifty with femoral head osteonecrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(6):1314–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vijay Shetty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shetty, V., Shitole, B., Shetty, G. et al. Optimal bearing surfaces for total hip replacement in the young patient: a meta-analysis. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 1281–1287 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1104-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1104-7

Keywords

Navigation