Skip to main content
Log in

Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a prospective and randomised clinical study, we implanted acetabular cups either by means of an image-free computer-navigation system (navigated group, n = 32) or by free-hand technique (freehand group n = 32, two drop-outs). Total hip replacement was conducted in the lateral position and through a minimally invasive anterior approach (MicroHip). The position of the component was determined postoperatively on CT scans of the pelvis using CT-planning software. We found an average inclination of 42.3° (range 32.7–50.6°; SD±3.8°) and an average anteversion of 24.5° (range 12.0–33.3°; SD±6.0°) in the computer-assisted study group and an average inclination of 37.9° (range 25.6–50.2°; SD±6.3°) and an average anteversion of 23.8° (range 5.6–46.9°; SD±10.1°) in the freehand group. The higher precision of computer navigation was indicated by the lower standard deviations. For both measurements we found a significant heterogeneity of variances (p < 0.05, Levene's test). The mean difference between the cup inclination/anteversion values displayed by computer navigation and the true cup position (CT control) was 0.37° (SD 3.26) and −5.61° (SD 6.48), respectively. We found a bias (underestimation) with regard to anteversion determined by the imageless computer navigation system. A bias for inclination was not found. Registration of the landmarks of the anterior pelvic plane in lateral position with undraped percutaneous methods leads to an error in cup anteversion, but not to an error in cup inclination. The bias we found is consistent with a correct registration of the anterosuperior iliac spine (ASIS) and with a registration of the symphysis 1 cm above the bone, corresponding to the less compressible overlying soft tissue in this region. There was no significant correlation between the bias and the thickness of soft tissue above the pubic tubercles. We suggest use of a percutaneous registration of ASIS and an invasive registration above the pubic tubercles when computer-assisted navigation is performed in minimally invasive THR in a lateral position.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jolles BM, Genoud P, Hoffmeyer P (2004) Computer-assisted cup placement techniques in total hip arthroplasty improve accuracy of placement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:174–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M (2004) Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:159–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalteis T, Handel M, Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J (2006) Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it as accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:163–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gandhi R, Marchie A, Farrokhyar F, Mahomed N (2009) Computer navigation in total hip replacement: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 33(3):593–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, Long WT, Harris M (2007) Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin Orthop Relat Res 465:92–99

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McCollum DE, Gray WJ (1990) Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Causes and prevention. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:159–170

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF, Lannin JV, Schurman DJ (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(7):1353–1358

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Michel MC, Witschger P (2007) MicroHip: a minimally invasive procedure for total hip replacement surgery using a modified Smith-Peterson approach. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil 9(1):46–51

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR (1978) Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:217–220

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Murray DW (1993) The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75-B:228–232

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370(9597):1508–1519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saxler G, Marx A, Vandevelde D, Langlotz U, Tannast M, Wiese M, Michaelis U, Kemper G, Grützner PA, Steffen R, von Knoch M, Holland-Letz T, Bernsmann K (2004) Cup placement in hip replacement surgery—a comparison of free-hand and computer assisted cup placement in total hip arthroplasty—a multi-center study. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 142(3):286–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ybinger T, Kumpan W (2007) Enhanced acetabular component positioning through computer-assisted navigation. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S35–S38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wixson RL, MacDonald MA (2005) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. J Arthroplasty 20(7 Suppl 3):51–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B (2003) Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18(2):123–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wixson RL (2008) Computer-assisted total hip navigation. Instr Course Lect 57:707–720

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parratte S, Kilian P, Pauly V, Champsaur P, Argenson JN (2008) The use of ultrasound in acquisition of the anterior pelvic plane in computer-assisted total hip replacement: a cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(2):258–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee YS, Yoon TR (2008) Error in acetabular socket alignment due to the thick anterior pelvic soft tissues. J Arthroplasty 23(5):699–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Babisch JW, Layher F, Amiot LP (2008) The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(2):357–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z (2009) Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467(1):119–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Renkawitz T, Tingart M, Grifka J, Sendtner E, Kalteis T (2009) Computer-assisted total hip arthroplasty: coding the next generation of navigation systems for orthopedic surgery. Expert Rev Med Devices 6(5):507–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ernst Sendtner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sendtner, E., Schuster, T., Wörner, M. et al. Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 809–815 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1042-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1042-4

Keywords

Navigation