Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective study is presented of 87 unstable intertrochanteric fractures treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) with a follow-up of one year. Of the patients 76% were female. The average age was 75.3 years. The fracture was treated by closed reduction and intramedullary fixation. Pre-injury activity level was recovered in 77% of the patients. Fractures united in all patients. Mechanical failure and cut-out were not observed. A technical problem related to the mismatch of the proximal end of the nail was observed in 11 cases. Nine patients presented with thigh pain due to the redundant proximal end of the nail. The results of the PFNA were satisfactory in most elderly Chinese patients. However, the proximal end of the nail was not matched with the specific anatomy of some short elderly patients. Further modifications of the nail are necessary for the elderly Chinese population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andreas A, Norbert S, Martin B et al (2007) Complications after intramedullary stabilization of proximal femur fractures: a retrospective analysis of 178 patients. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 33:262–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM et al (1995) The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 78:1058–1064

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beatrix H, Andre G (2004) Complications following the treatment of trochanteric fractures with the gamma nail. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:692–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunner A, Jockel JA, Babst R (2008) The PFNA proximal femur nail in treatment of unstable proximal femur fractures—3 cases of postoperative perforation of the helical blade into the hip joint. J Orthop Trauma 22:731–736

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Domingo L, Cecilia D, Herrera A et al (2001) Trochanteric fractures treated with a proximal femoral nail. Int Orthop 25:298–301

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans PJ, Mcgory BJ (2002) Fractures of the proximal femur. Hospital Physician 38(4):30–38

    Google Scholar 

  7. Felix B, Henry Z, Christoph L et al (2005) Treatment strategies for proximal femur fractures in osteoporotic patients. Osteoporos Int 16:S93–S102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin HH, Jong KO, Sang HH et al (2008) Mismatch between PFNa and medullary canal causing difficulty in nailing of the pertrochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(12):1443–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Keats AS (1978) ASA classification of physical status: a recapitulation. Anesthesiology 49:233–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lenich A, May E, Rüter A et al (2006) First results with the trochanter fixation nail (TFN): a report on 120 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126:706–712

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Leung KS, Procter P, Robioneck B et al (1996) Geometric mismatch of the Gamma nail to the Chinese femur. Clin Orthop Relat Res 323:42–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Müller ME, Nazarian S, Koch P, Schatzker J (1990) The comprehensive classification of fractures of long bones. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  13. Papasimos S, Koutsojannis CM, Panagopoulos A (2005) A randomised comparison of AMBI, TGN and PFN for treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 125:462–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schipper IB, Steyerberg EW, Castelein RM et al (2004) Treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures: Randomised comparison of the gamma nail and the proximal femoral nail. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 86:86–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Simmermacher RKJ, Bosch AM, Van Der Werken C (1999) The AO/ASIF proximal femoral nail (PFN): a new device for the treatment of unstable proximal fractures. Injury 30:327–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Simmermacher RKJ, Ljungqvist J, Bail H et al (2008) The new proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in daily practice: results of a multicentre clinical study. Injury 39:932–939

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Statement on conflict of interest

The authors have not received nor will receive benefits from any source for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tian-Fu Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pu, JS., Liu, L., Wang, GL. et al. Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 1441–1444 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0776-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0776-3

Keywords

Navigation