Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical and biological assessment of cemented titanium femoral stems: an 11-year experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study prospectively assessed the outcome of 134 cemented titanium stems and serum ion levels. The stems were polished (0.1 μm Ra) with circular cross section. At the end point, only one stem revision was performed for aseptic loosening, and two were planned due to subsidence greater than 5 mm. Non-progressive radiolucencies in zones 1 and 7 were observed in 16 hips at the cement-bone interface without osteolysis. Median serum titanium concentrations were below the detection limit (30 nmol/l) except in patients with failed stems. The overall stem survival rate was 97.7% at nine years, which is comparable to other series of cemented stems. The protective layer of titanium oxide coating the stem and a thick cement mantle may help resist aseptic loosening. In addition, satisfactory monitoring of the stem was reached using titanium serum level determination.

Résumé

Cette étude rapporte le suivi clinique prospectif d’une série de 134 tiges fémorales titane cimentées et l’évolution des taux de titane sérique. Les implants étaient en titane anodisé, lisses (0.1-microm Ra) et de section circulaire. Au recul moyen de 9 ans, le taux de survie était de 97,7%, ce qui est comparable aux autres séries de tiges cimentées. On notait une reprise pour descellement et deux révisions prévisibles pour un enfoncement supérieur à 5 mm. Des liserés non évolutifs étaient observés en zones 1 et 7 pour 16 hanches sans ostéolyse. La médiane du titane sérique était inférieure à la limite de détection (30 nmol/l) à l’exception des 3 échecs où les taux sont étaient nettement plus élevés. La couche protectrice d’oxyde de titane et l’épaisseur du manteau de ciment peuvent expliquer la résistance au descellement aseptique. Le taux de titane sérique semble intéressant pour la surveillance des tiges titanes cimentées.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barrack Rl (2000) Early failure of modern cemented stems. J Arthroplasty 15:1036–1050

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brodner W, Bitzan P, Meisinger V, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F, Kotz R (2003) Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:2168–2173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH Jr (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Buly Rl, Huo MH, Salvati E, Brien W, Bansal M (1992) Titanium wear debris in failed cemented total hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 71 cases. J Arthroplasty 7:315–323

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. DeLee JG, Charnley J (1976) Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 121:20–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dorr LD, Bloebaum R, Emmanual J, Meldrum R (1990) Histologic, biochemical, and ion analysis of tissue and fluids retrieved during total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 261:82–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ebramzadeh E, Normand PL, Sangiorgio SN, Llinas A, Gruen TA, McKellop HA, Sarmiento A (2003) Long-term radiographic changes in cemented total hip arthroplasty with six designs of femoral components. Biomaterials 24:3351–3363

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Estok DM 2nd, Orr TE, Harris WH (1997) Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component. J Arthroplasty 12:40–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) “Modes of failure” of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 141:17–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamadouche M, Boutin P, Daussange J, Bolander ME, Sedel L (2002) Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a minimum 18.5-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:69–77

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harris WH (1994) Osteolysis and particle disease in hip replacement. A review. Acta Orthop Scand 65:113–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Head WC, Bauk DJ, Emerson RH Jr (1995) Titanium as the material of choice for cementless femoral components in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 311:85–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Campbell PA, Hallab NJ, Urban RM, Amstutz HC (2004) Can metal levels be used to monitor metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties? J Arthroplasty 19(8 Suppl 3):59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jacobs JJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NJ, Paprosky WG, Black J, Galante JO (1998) Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1447–1458

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jergesen HE, Karlen JW (2002) Clinical outcome in total hip arthroplasty using a cemented titanium femoral prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 17:592–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kasai Y, Iida R, Uchida A (2003) Metal concentrations in the serum and hair of patients with titanium alloy spinal implants. Spine 28:1320–1326

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelley SS, Fitzgerald RH Jr, Rand JA, Ilstrup DM (1993) A prospective randomized study of a collar versus a collarless femoral prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 294:114–122

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Langlais F, Kerboull M, Sedel L, Ling RS (2003) The ‘French paradox’. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lappalainen R, Santavirta SS (2005) Potential of coatings in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 430:72–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Le Mouel S, Allain J, Goutallier D (1998) 10-year actuarial analysis of a cohort of 156 total hip prostheses of a cemented polished aluminum/polyethylene alloy (in French). Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 84:338–345

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leopold SS, Berger RA, Patterson L, Skipor AK, Urban RM, Jacobs JJ (2000) Serum titanium level for diagnosis of a failed, metal-backed patellar component. J Arthroplasty 15:938–943

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Malchau H, Herberts P, Eisler T, Garellick G, Soderman P (2002) The Swedish Total Hip Replacement Register. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A(Suppl 2):2–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mcgrath LR, Shardlow DL, Ingham E, Andrews M, Ivory J, Stone MH, Fisher J (2001) A retrieval study of capital hip prostheses with titanium alloy femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:1195–1201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Scholl E, Eggli S, Ganz R (2000) Osteolysis in cemented titanium alloy hip prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 15:570–575

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thomas SR, Shukla D, Latham PD (2004) Corrosion of cemented titanium femoral stems. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:974–978

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Willert HG, Brobäck LG, Buchhorn GH, Jensen PH, Köster G, Lang I, Ochsner P, Schenk R (1996) Crevice corrosion of cemented titanium alloy stems in total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 333:51–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Boyer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyer, P., Lazennec, JY., Poupon, J. et al. Clinical and biological assessment of cemented titanium femoral stems: an 11-year experience. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 1209–1215 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0678-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0678-9

Keywords

Navigation