Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anterior corpectomy and fusion for severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Between May 2002 and October 2006, 19 patients (17 men and 2 women; average age 57.2; range 47–71 years) received anterior corpectomy and fusion for severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in our department. Preoperative radiological evaluation showed the narrowing by the OPLL exceeded 50% in all cases, and OPLL extended from one to three vertebrae. We followed-up all patients for 12–36 months (mean 18 months). The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score before surgery was 9.3 ± 1.8 (range 5–12) which significantly increased to 14.2 ± 1.3 (range 11–16) points at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). The improvement rate (IR) of neurological function ranged from 22.2–87.5%, with a mean of 63.2% ± 15.2%. The operation also provided a significant increase in the cervical lordosis and the cord flatting rate (P < 0.01). No severe neurological complication developed. We therefore concluded that anterior decompression and fusion was effective and safe in the treatment of the selected patients, although OPLL exceeded 50% diameter of the spinal canal.

Résumé

Entre mai 2002 et octobre 2006, 19 patients (17 hommes et 2 femmes) âgés en moyenne de 57,2 ans (47 à 71 ans) ont bénéficié d’une corporectomie antérieure avec arthrodèse pour une ossification sévère postérieure du ligament (OPLL). L’évaluation radiologique préopératoire a montré que l’importance de l’ossification était supérieure à 50% dans tous les cas et cette ossification (OPLL) s’étendait sur 1 à 3 niveaux vertébraux. Tous les patients ont été suivis en moyenne de 12 à 36 mois (18 mois en moyenne). Le score de la JOA a été de 1,8 en préopératoire (5 à 12) et a progressé jusqu’à 9,3 à 14,2 (11 à 16) au dernier suivi (P < 0,01). Le pourcentage d’amélioration neurologique a été de 22,2% à 87,5% avec une moyenne de 63,2%. L’intervention entraîne également une amélioration significative de la lordose cervicale et du taux d’applatissement de la moelle (P < 0,01). Aucune complication neurologique sévère n’a été observée. Nous pouvons conclure que la décompression antérieure associée à une greffe est une technique efficace et sûre du traitement des OPLL chez les patients sélectionnés dont le diamètre du canal rachidien doit être supérieur à 50%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choi S, Lee SH, Lee JY et al (2005) Factors affecting prognosis of patients who underwent corpectomy and fusion for treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: analysis of 47 patients. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:309–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiang HS, Kondo S, Mizuno J et al (2004) Airway obstruction caused by cerebrospinal fluid leakage after anterior cervical spine surgery. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 86:370–372

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dorai Z, Morgan H, Coimbra C (2003) Titanium cage reconstruction after cervical corpectomy. J Neurosurg 24:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  4. Epstein N (2001) Anterior approaches to cervical spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: review of operative technique and assessment of 65 multilevel circumferential procedures. Surg Neurol 55:313–324

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Epstein N (1993) The surgical management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in 51 patients. J Spinal Disord 6:432–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Epstein N (2001) Identification of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament extending through the dura on preoperative computed tomographic examinations of the cervical spine. Spine 26:182–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hee HT, Majd ME, Holt RT et al (2003) Complications of multilevel cervical corpectomies and reconstruction with titanium cages and anterior plating. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hida K, Iwasaki Y, Koyanagi I et al (1997) Bone window computed tomography for detection of dural defect associated with cervical ossification posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 37:173–175

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A et al (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine 32:647–653

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A et al (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine 32:654–660

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kojima T, Waga S, Kudo Y et al (1989) Anterior cervical vertebrectomy and interbody fusion for multilevel spondylosis and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Neurosurgery 24:864–871

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kanayama M, Hashimoto T, Shigenobu K et al (2003) Pitfalls of anterior cervical fusion using titanium mesh and local autograft. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:513–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mizuno J, Nakagawa H (2006) Ossified posterior longitudinal ligament: management strategies and outcomes. Spine J 6:282–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Masaki Y, Yamazaki M, Okawa A et al (2007) An analysis of factors causing poor surgical outcome in patients with cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: anterior decompression with spinal fusion versus laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 20:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuoka T, Yamaura I, Kurosa Y et al (2001) Long-term results of the anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 26:241–248

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Narotam PK, Pauley SM, McGinn GJ (2003) Titanium mesh cages for cervical spine stabilization after corpectomy: a clinical and radiological study. J Neurosurg 24:172–180

    Google Scholar 

  17. Onari K, Akiyama N, Kondo S et al (2001) Long-term follow-up results of anterior interbody fusion applied for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 26:488–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith MD, Bolesta MJ, Leventhal M et al (1992) Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid fistula associated with erosion of the dura. Findings after anterior resection of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. J Bone Joint Surg 74:270–277

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tani T, Ushida T, Ishida K et al (2002) Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine 27:2491–2498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yamaura I, Kurosa Y, Matuoka T et al (1999) Anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359:27–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yonenobu K, Hosono N, Iwasaki M et al (1991) Neurologic complications of surgery for cervical compression myelopathy. Spine 16:1277–1282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deyu Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, Y., Chen, D., Wang, X. et al. Anterior corpectomy and fusion for severe ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 33, 477–482 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0542-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-008-0542-y

Keywords

Navigation