Skip to main content
Log in

Wide excision and ulno-carpal arthrodesis for primary aggressive and recurrent giant cell tumours

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Twenty-five patients underwent wide resection of the distal radial giant cell tumours (GCTs) followed by ulno-carpal arthrodesis. There were 15 male and ten female patients, with an average age of 21.5 years. Tumours included ten primary aggressive and 15 recurrent GCTs. Mean follow up was 2.4 years. Pain, swelling and reduced range of movement (ROM) were noted. Average time to fusion was 7.6 months. Five patients had persistent pain in the proximal forearm. Grip strength was 65% compared to the uninvolved side. Two patients had superficial wound infection, two underwent additional bone grafting and three implant removals due to hardware prominence were carried out. There was no evidence of carpal instability or arthritis on clinical or radiological examination at the time of final follow up. Fusion of the carpus to the ulna is a simple method of producing a painless stable wrist, though at the expense of mobility. The procedure allows wide resection with a lower rate of recurrence. Pain in the proximal forearm seems to persist for 3 to 4 months only to improve at subsequent follow up. The procedure provides a valid option for the management of primary aggressive and recurrent GCTs of distal radius.

Résumé

25 patients ont bénéficié d’une large résection pour tumeurs à cellules géantes agressives de l’extrémité distale du radius. A ce traitement a été associé une arthrodèse cubito carpienne. Il s’agissait de 15 sujets de sexe masculin et de 10 sujets de sexe féminin. 10 tumeurs étaient primitives et 15 étaient des récidives. L’âge moyen des patients était de 21.5 ans, le suivi moyen de 2.4 ans. Les douleurs et la mobilité du poignet ont été évaluées. Le temps moyen pour la fusion osseuse a été de 7.6 mois. 5 patients présentaient des douleurs résiduelles au niveau de l’extrémité distale de l’avant bras, la force de serrage était de 65% en comparaison au côté sain. Deux patients ont présenté une infection superficielle, deux ont nécessité une greffe secondaire et trois une ablation de matériel nécessaire du fait de la gêne qu’il entraînait. Le suivi n’a pas mis en évidence d’instabilité du carpe ou d’arthrose. Seuls 4 patients ont dû changer de travail. L’arthrodèse du cubitus au carpe est une technique simple, peu douloureuse et permettant d’obtenir un poignet stable. Cette technique permet de larges résections avec un taux faible de récidive de la tumeur. La douleur semble persister au niveau de l’avant bras pendant 3 ou 4 mois puis paraît s’améliorer par la suite. Cette technique nous semble tout à fait valable pour le traitement des tumeurs primitives à cellules géantes agressives ainsi que pour les récidives de tumeurs à cellules géantes de l’extrémité distale du radius.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blackley HR, Wunder JS, Davis AM, White LM, Kandel R, Bell RS (1999) Treatment of giant-cell tumors of long bones with curettage and bone-grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(6):811–820 (June)

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Castle ME (1974) One-bone forearm. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:1223–1227

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chase SW, Herndon CH (1955) The fate of autogenous and homogenous bone grafts: a historical review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 37:809–841

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cheng CY, Shih HN, Hsu KY, Hsu RW (2001 Feb) Treatment of giant cell tumor of the distal radius. Clin Orthop Relat Res 383:221–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Enneking WF, Eady JL, Burchardt H (1980) Autogenous cortical bone grafts in the reconstruction of segmental skeletal defects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1039–1058

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldenberg RR, Campbell CJ, Bonfiglio M (1970) Giant cell tumor of bone: an analysis of two hundred and eighteen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 52:619–664

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris WR, Lehmann ECH (1983) Recurrent giant-cell tumour after en bloc excision of the distal radius and fibular autograft replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 65:618–620

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kocher MS, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ (1998) Reconstruction of the distal aspect of the radius with use of an osteoarticular allograft after excision of a skeletal tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80(3):407–419

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mankin HJ, Fogelson FS, Thrasher AZ, Jaffer F (1976) Massive resection and allograft transplantation in the treatment of malignant bone tumor. N Eng J Med 294:1247–1255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Minami A, Kato H, Iwasaki N (2002) Vascularized fibular graft after excision of giant-cell tumor of the distal radius: wrist arthroplasty versus partial wrist arthrodesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 110(1):112–117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Murray JA, Schafly B (1986) Giant-cell tumors in the distal end of the radius. Treatment by resection and fibular autograft interpositional arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:687–694

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Noellert RC, Louis DS (1985) Long-term follow-up of nonvascularized fibular autografts for distal radial reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 10:335–340

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. O’Donnell RJ, Springfield DS, Motwani HK, Ready JE, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ (1994) Recurrence of giant-cell tumors of the long bones after curettage and packing with cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:1827–1833

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Parker SM, Hastings DE, Fornasier VL (1974) Giant cell tumour of distal radius replaced by massive fibular autograft: a case report. Can J Surg 17:266–268

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pho RWH (1979) Free vascularised fibular transplant for replacement of the lower radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br 61:362–365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sakellarides HT (1965) Extensive giant-cell tumor of the lower end radius. A report of 1 case treated by resection and replacement with the fibula. Clin Orthop 42:151–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Salenius P, Santavirta S, Kiviluoto O, Koskinen EVS (1981) Application of free autogenous fibular graft in the treatment of aggressive bone tumours of the distal end of the radius. Arch Orthop Traumat Surg 98:285–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Seradge H (1982) Distal ulnar translocation in the treatment of giant-cell tumors of the distal end of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:67–73

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith RJ, Mankin HJ (1977) Allograft replacement of distal radius for giant cell tumor. J Hand Surg Am 4:299–308

    Google Scholar 

  20. Starr DE (1945) Congenital absence of the radius. A method of surgical correction. J Bone Joint Surg 27:572–577

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stewart MJ, Richardson TR (1952) Giant cell tumor of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am 34:372–386

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Denmark RE Jr, Van Denmark RE Sr (1988) Nonvascularized fibular autograft to treat recurrent giant cell tumor of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 13:671–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Aithal VK, Bhaskaranand K (2003) Reconstruction of the distal radius by fibula following excision of giant cell tumor. Int Orthop 27(2):110–113

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Oda Y, Miura H, Tsuneyoshi M, Iwamoto Y (1998) Giant cell tumor of bone: oncological and functional results of long-term follow-up. Jpn J Clin Oncol 28(5):323–328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bhagat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bhagat, S., Bansal, M., Jandhyala, R. et al. Wide excision and ulno-carpal arthrodesis for primary aggressive and recurrent giant cell tumours. International Orthopaedics (SICO 32, 741–745 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0416-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-007-0416-8

Keywords

Navigation