Abstract
The authors followed up 20 patients with multiple diaphyseal fractures of the radius and ulna who were treated nonoperatively and who healed with axial deviation >5° in at least one plane 20.4±6.7 years after radiographic evidence of fracture union. Mean age at follow-up was 28.6±6.4 years. Radiographs were measured soon after reduction, at 10 days from reduction, at the end of treatment, and at follow-up (17/20). Both elbow and forearm range of motion (ROM) were compared with those of the contralateral side. At follow-up, ROM was normal and radiographs showed angular deviations <5°.
Résumé
A un recul moyen de 20.4±6.7 ans, les auteurs étudient 20 patients avec des fractures diaphysaires multiples du radius et du cubitus, traitées non-opérativement et qui avaient consolidé avec une déviation axiale de plus de 5° dans au moins un plan. L’âge moyen au recul était de 28.6±6.4 ans. Les radiographies étaient mesurées juste après la réduction,10 jours plus tard , à la fin du traitement et au dernier recul. La mobilité du coude et de l’avant-bras était comparée au côté opposé. Au recul les mobilités étaient normales et les radiographies montraient des déviations de moins de 5°.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blount WP (1955) Fractures in children. William & Wilkins, Baltimore
Creasman C, Zaleske DJ, Ehrlich MG (1984) Analyzing forearm fractures in children: the more subtle sign of impending problems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 188:40–53
Firl M, Wunsch L (2004) Measurement of bowing of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg B 86:1047–1049
Gustilo RB, Anderson JT (1976) Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg A 58:453–458
Hahn MP, Richter D, Muhr G, Ostermann PA (1997) Pediatric forearm fractures. Diagnosis, therapy and possible complications. Unfallchirurg 100:760–769
Johari AN, Sinha M (1999) Remodeling of forearm fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 8:84–87
Jones K, Weiner DS (1999) The management of forearm fractures in children: a plea for conservatism. J Pediatr Orthop 19:811–815
Ostermann PA, Richter D, Mecklenburg K, Ekkernkamp A, Muhr G, Hahn MP (1999) Pediatric forearm fractures: indications, technique, and limits of conservative management. Unfallchirurg 102:784–790
Qidwai SA (2001) Treatment of dyaphyseal forearm fractures in children by intramedullary Kirschner wires. J Trauma 50:303–307
Quairul IH, Kareem BA, Tan AB, Harwant S (2001) Early remodeling in children’s forearm fractures. Med J Malaysia 56[Suppl D]:34–37
Rodrìguez-Merchan EC (2005) Pediatric fractures of the forearm. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:65–72
Schlickewei W, Oberle M (2005) Forearm fractures in children. Unfalchirurg 108:223–234
Schmittenbecher PP (2005) State-of-the-art treatment of forearm shaft fractures. Injury. Int J Care Injured 36:SA25–SA34
Schmittenbecher PP, Dietz HG, Uhl S (1991) Late results of forearm fractures in childhood. Unfallchirurg 94:186–190
Smith VA, Goodman HJ, Strongwater A, Smith B (2005) Treatment of pediatric both-bone forearm fractures: a comparison of operative techniques. J Pediatr Orthop 25:309–313
Vittas D, Larsen E, Tomp-Pederson S (1991) Angular remodelling of midshaft forearm fractures in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 265:261–264
Acknowledgements
We thank Doctor P.M. Peters for his review of this work, Doctor A. Capurro for the translation and S. Panichi for his work with the archives.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boero, S., Michelis, M.B., Calevo, M.G. et al. Multiple forearm diaphyseal fracture: reduction and plaster cast control at the end of growth. International Orthopaedics (SICO 31, 807–810 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0255-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0255-z