Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Complications of Ilizarov leg lengthening: a comparative study between patients with leg length discrepancy and short stature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Ilizarov technique has been used to treat severe limb length discrepancy and short stature. However, complications of this treatment are frequent. Between 1984 and 2001, 57 patients (94 tibias) had an Ilizarov procedure for limb lengthening. Twenty patients had limb discrepancy and 37 had short stature. Their mean age was 20.2 years (range 15–34). The average limb lengthening was 8.37 cm (range 3.2–14.7), which was equivalent to 26% (range 9.2–60%) average tibial lengthening. A total of 90 complications were observed. Thirty-three unplanned procedures were required during the lengthening programme. Two patients stopped the lengthening programme. There was no difference in the complications in leg lengthening using Ilizarov technique between the group of patients with leg length discrepancy and the group with short stature. A good knowledge of the Ilizarov technique is necessary to perform a lengthening programme with a low rate of complications.

Résumé

La technique d’Ilizarov a été utilisée pour traiter d’importantes inégalités de longueur et pour allonger des sujets de petites tailles. Les complications de ce traitement sont fréquentes. De 1984 à 2001, 57 patients (94 tibias) ont bénéficié d’un allongement des membres inférieurs au niveau de la jambe par la technique d’Ilizarov. Vingt patients avaient une inégalité de longueur et 37 une petite taille. L’âge moyen était de 20.2 ans (de 15 à 34). L’allongement moyen a été de 8.37 cm (3.2 à 14.7), c’est-à-dire de 26% de la longueur de l’os (9.2 à 60%). Quatre-vingts dix complications ont été observées. Trente-trois interventions non prévues dans le plan de traitement ont dû être réalisées, pendant le programme d’allongement. Deux patients ont arrêté leur programme d’allongement. Les auteurs n’ont pas observé de différence dans le taux de complication entre le groupe des patients qui ont bénéficié d’un allongement selon la technique d’Ilizarov pour inégalités de longueur ou pour petites tailles. Il est nécessaire, pour tous les auteurs, de bien connaître la technique d’Ilizarov si l’on veut réaliser un programme d’allongement avec un taux de complications relativement bas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aldegheri R (1999) Distraction osteogenesis for lengthening of the tibia in patients who have length discrepancy or short stature. J Bone Joint Surg 81-A(5):624–634

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bail HJ, Kolbeck S, Krummrey G, Weiler A, Windhagen H, Hennies K, Raun K, Raschke M (2002) Ultrasound can predict regenerate stiffness in distraction osteogenesis. Clin Orthop Rel Res (404):362–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bidwell JP, Bennet GC, Bell M, Witherow P (2000) Leg lengthening for short stature in Turner’s syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg. 82-B(8):1174–1176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnard C, Favard L, Sollogoub I, Glorion B (1993) Limb lengthening in children using the Ilizarov method. Clin Orthop Rel Res 293:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  5. Catagni MA, Lovisetti L, Guerreschi F, Combi A, Ottaviani G (2005) Cosmetic bilateral leg lengthening: experience of 54 cases. J Bone Joint Surg 87-B(10):1402–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caton J (1991) Traitement des inégalités de longueur des membres inférieures et des sujets de petite taille chez l’enfant et l’adolescent. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 77 [Suppl 1]:31–80

    Google Scholar 

  7. Codivilla A (1905) On the means of lengthening, in the lower limbs, the muscles and tissues which are shortened through deformity. Am J Orthop Surg 2:353–369

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman SS, Stevens PM (1978) Tibial lengthening. Clin Orthop Rel Res 136:92–104

    Google Scholar 

  9. Danziger MB, Kumar A, De Weeze J (1995) Fractures after femoral lengthening using the Ilizarov method. J Pediatr Orthop 15(2):220–223

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghoneem HF, Wright JG, Cole WG, Rang M (1996) The Ilizarov method for correction of complex deformities. Psychological and functional outcomes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78(10):1480–1485

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones DC, Moseley CF (1985) Subluxation of the knee as a complication of femoral lengthening by the Wagner technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67(1):33–35

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paley D (1990) Problems, obstacles and complications of limb lengthening by the Ilizarov technique. Clin Orthop Rel Res 250:81–104

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shevtsov V, Popkov A, Popkov D, Prevot J (2001) Réduction de la durée de traitement dans les allongements osseux progressifs. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87(3):248–256

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stanitski DF, Shahcheraghi H, Nicker DA, Armstrong PF (1996) Results of tibial lengthening with the Ilizarov technique. J Pediatr Orthop 16(2):168–172

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner H (1977) Surgical lengthening or shortening of femur and tibia. Technique and indications. In: Hungerford DS (ed) Progress in orthopaedic surgery. Leg length discrepancy. The injured knee, vol 1. Springer, New York Berlin Heidelberg, pp 71–94

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yun AG, Severino R, Reinker K (2000) Attempted limb lengthenings beyond twenty percent of the initial bone length: results and complications. J Pediatr Orthop 20(2):151–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Caton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vargas Barreto, B., Caton, J., Merabet, Z. et al. Complications of Ilizarov leg lengthening: a comparative study between patients with leg length discrepancy and short stature. International Orthopaedics (SICO 31, 587–591 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0236-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0236-2

Keywords

Navigation