Skip to main content
Log in

Patient satisfaction following carpal-tunnel decompression: a comparison of patients with and without osteoarthritis of the wrist

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess whether surgical decompression for carpal-tunnel syndrome (CTS) in the presence of primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the wrist is associated with poorer patient satisfaction. We did a retrospective matched cohort study. Twenty-four patients who underwent surgical decompression for CTS secondary to osteoarthritis were identified by reviewing the notes and the radiographs. A control group consisted of 24 patients without osteoarthritis of the wrist who underwent carpal-tunnel decompression. The control group was matched for age, sex, side, and neuro-physiological severity of the nerve compression. In the group with osteoarthritis of the wrist, 17 (71%) patients reported their symptom relief as satisfactory, and 7 (29%) reported the results as unsatisfactory. In the control group, 23 (96%) patients reported their symptom relief as satisfactory, and 1 (4%) reported the results as unsatisfactory (P=0.0325). In conclusion, patient satisfaction following surgical decompression in patients with secondary CTS due to osteoarthritis was significantly lower compared to patients without osteoarthritis of the wrist.

Résumé

Le but de ce travail, à partir d’une étude rétrospective de 2 groupes appariés est de savoir si la décompression chirurgicale pour syndrome du canal carpien (SCC) en cas d’arthrose du poignet est associée à de mauvais résultats. 24 patients ayant eu cette intervention étaient identifiés sur dossiers et radiographies et comparés avec un groupe de 24 patients, sans arthrose du poignet, ayant eu la même intervention. Ce groupe de contrôle était apparié pour l’age, le sexe, le côté, et la sévérité neurologique de la compression. Dans le groupe avec arthrose 17 (71%) patients trouvent le résultat satisfaisant et les 7 autres (29%) le trouve insatisfaisant. Dans le groupe de contrôle 23 (96%) patients sont satisfaits et 1 (4%) est insatisfait (P=0.0325). En conclusion la satisfaction des patients opérés pour syndrome du canal carpien secondaire à une arthrose est nettement inférieure à celle ressentie chez les patients sans arthrose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clarke AM, Stanley D (1993) Prediction of outcome 24 hours after carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg [Br] 18(2):180–181

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eskandari MM, Ozge A, Oztuna V, Colak M, Kanik A, Kuyurtar F (2005) Effect of patient age and symptom duration on subjective and objective outcomes of carpal tunnel surgery. Orthopaedics 28(6):600–602

    Google Scholar 

  3. Geogheghan JM, Clark DI, Bainbridge LC, Smith C, Hubbard R (2004) Risk factors in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 29(4):315–320

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herczeg E, Otto A, Vass A, Piza-Katzer H (1997) Significance of double crush syndrome in carpal tunnel syndrome. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 29(3):144–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hobby JL, Venkatesh R, Motkur P (2005) The effect of age and gender upon symptoms and surgical outcomes in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 30(6):599–604

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hurst LC, Weissberg D, Caroll RE (1985) The significance of double crush to carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg [Br] 10(2):202–204

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Katz JN, Losina E, Amick BC 3rd, Fossel AH, Bessette L, Keller RB (2001) Predictors of outcomes of carpal tunnel release. Arthritis Rheum 44(5):1184–1193

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kellegren JH, Lawrence JS (1957) Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 16:494–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Leit ME, Weiser RW, Tomaino MM (2004) Patient-reported outcome after carpal tunnel release for advanced disease: a prospective and longitudinal assessment in patients older than age 70. J Hand Surg [Am] 29(3):379–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Michelson H, Posner MA (2002) Medical history of carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clin 18(2):257–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mondelli M, Padua L, Reale F (2004) Carpal tunnel syndrome in elderly patients: results of surgical decompression. J Peripher Nerv Syst 9(3):168–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozkul Y, Sabuncu T, Kocabey Y, Nazligul Y (2002) Outcomes of carpal tunnel release in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Acta Neurol Scand 106(3):168–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Porter P, Venkateswaran B, Stephenson H, Wray CC (2002) The influence of age on outcome after operation for carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(5):688–691

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Prick JJ, Blaauw G, Vredeveld JW, Oosterioo SJ (2003) Results of carpal tunnel release. Eur J Neurol 10(6):733–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Schuh A, Schuh R (2002) Experience with 925 outpatient operations of carpal tunnel syndrome. Zentralbl Chir 127(3):224–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schwartz DA (2005) Clinical outcomes of carpal tunnel release in patients 65 and older. J Hand Ther 18(3):386–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Joshy.

Additional information

We as authors are responsible for this paper. No benefits in any form have been received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshy, S., Thomas, B., Ghosh, S. et al. Patient satisfaction following carpal-tunnel decompression: a comparison of patients with and without osteoarthritis of the wrist. International Orthopaedics (SICO 31, 1–3 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0094-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-006-0094-y

Keywords

Navigation