Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Revision of the Sheehan total knee arthroplasty

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of the Sheehan knee prosthesis extended from 1971 to 2002. It incorporated a semi-constrained hinge with intra-medullary stems cemented into the femur and tibia. While some authors have reported excellent short-term results, others have reported revision rates of up to 31% at 5–10 years. The aim of this study was to review the senior author’s experience in revising these arthroplasties. We review 54 Sheehan total knee replacements and discuss the difficulties encountered during first and subsequent revisions and the often-complex reconstruction techniques used to overcome these.

Résumé

L’utilisation de la prothèse de genou de type Sheehan s’est étendue de 1971 à 2002. Elle comportait une charnière semi-contrainte avec des tiges intra-médullaires cimentées dans le fémur et le tibia. Tandis que d’excellents résultats à court terme ont été rapportés par quelques auteurs, un taux de révision jusqu’à 31% à 5–10 ans a été rapporté par d’autres. Le but de cette étude était examiner l’expérience de l’auteur senior dans la révision des prothèses de Sheehan. Nous avons examiné 54 prothèses et discutons les difficultés rencontrées pendant l’arthroplastie initiale et les révisions ultérieures ainsi que les techniques souvent complexes de reconstruction utilisées pour les mener à bien.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Callihan SM, Halley DK (1985) Prospective analysis of Sheehan total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 192:124–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen C, Helal B (1980) Preliminary results of the Sheehan total knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 4:67–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jakim I, Barlin C, Sweet MB (1988) A 5–9 year follow-up study of the Sheehan total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 3(Suppl):S21–S30

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krugluger J, Zenz P, Parzer R, Jantsch S, Hackel H (1991) Longterm analysis of Sheehan total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 15:149–154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McCoy GF, McLeod NM, Nixon JR (1983) Experience with the Sheehan knee replacement. Ulster Med J 52:35–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Porter M, Hirst P (1988) The Sheehan total knee arthroplasty. A retrospective review. Clin Orthop 236:227–232

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rickhuss PK, Gray AJ, Rowley DI (1994) A 5–10 year follow-up of the Sheehan total knee endoprosthesis in Tayside. J R Coll Surg Edinb 39:326–328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Saleh KJ, Macaulay A, Radosevich DM et al (2001) The knee society index of severity for failed total knee arthroplasty: practical application. Clin Orthop 392:153–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheehan JM (1978) Arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 60:333–338

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheehan JM (1979) Arthroplasty of the knee. Clin Orthop 145:101–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Hurson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hurson, C., Boran, S., Synnott, K. et al. Revision of the Sheehan total knee arthroplasty. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 29, 241–244 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0637-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-005-0637-7

Keywords

Navigation