References
Audigé L, Hanson B, Swiontkowski MF (2003) Implant-related complications in the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: Meta-analysis of dynamic screw-plate versus dynamic screw-intramedullary nail devices. Int Orthop 27:197–203
Benum P, Grontvedt T, Broten M, Walloe A, Ekeland A, Raugstad S, Fasting O (1992) Gamma nail versus CHS in intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric femoral fractures—a preliminary report of a prospective randomized study. Acta Orthop Scand 63:7–8
Fornander P, Thorngren K-G, Törnqvist H, Ahrengart L, Lindgren U (1994) Swedish experience with the Gamma nail versus sliding hip screw in 209 randomised cases . Int J Orthop Trauma 4:118–122
Madsen JE, Naess L, Aune AK, Alho A, Ekeland A, Stromsoe K (1998) Dynamic hip screw with trochanteric stabilizing plate in the treatment of unstable proximal femoral fractures: a comparative study with the Gamma nail and compression hip screw. J Orthop Trauma 12:241–248
Parker MJ, Handoll HH (2003) Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures. In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, Wiley, Chichester
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Audigé, L., Hanson, B. & Swiontkowski, M.F. Answer to Handoll and Parker. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 28, 62–63 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0529-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0529-7