Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Primary Stanmore total hip arthroplasty with increased cup loosening in rheumatoid patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied all Stanmore total hip arthroplasties (THA, n=325) implanted at our center between 1980 and 1990. Seven patients (seven hips), followed for less than 12 months, were excluded. Five hips were lost at follow-up. The mean follow-up was 117 (12–252) months. A total of 18 hips were revised, with median time between operation and revision 163 months. With revision as endpoint, a survival rate analysis was calculated. The mean survival for all hips was 82% at 18 years (95% confidence interval 64–101%). For hips with rheumatoid arthritis, the survival rate was 58%, whereas in osteoarthritic hips the rate was 95% after 18 years. A high proportion of acetabular loosening was seen in rheumatoid hips.

Résumé

Nous avons étudié toutes les Arthroplasties totales de la hanche de type Stanmore ( n=325) implantées à notre centre entre 1980 et 1990. Sept malades (7 hanches), suivis moins de 12 mois, ont été exclus. Cinq hanches ont été perdues de vue. Le suivi moyen était 117 (12–252) mois. Un total de 18 hanches a été révisé avec un temps médian de 163 mois entre l'opération et la révision. Avec la révision comme point final une analyse du taux de survie a été faite. La survie moyenne pour toutes les hanches était 82% à 18 années (95% intervalle de la confiance 64–101%). Pour les hanches avec une polyarthrite rhumatoïde le taux de la survie était 58%, alors que dans les hanches arthrosiques le taux était 95% après 18 années. Une grande proportion de descellements acétabulaires a été notée dans les hanches rhumatoïdes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akesson K, Onsten I, Obrant KJ (1994) Periarticular bone in rheumatoid arthritis versus arthrosis. Histomorphometry in 103 hip biopsies. Acta Orthop Scand 65: 135–138

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baxter K, Bevan G (1999) An economic model to estimate the relative costs over 20 years of different hip prostheses. J Epidemiol Community Health 53: 542–547

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Creighton MG, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Johnston RC (1998) Total hip arthroplasty with cement in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. A minimum ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 80: 1439–1446

    Google Scholar 

  4. Emery D, Britton A, Clarke H, Grover M (1997) The Stanmore total hip arthroplasty. A 15- to-20-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 12: 728–735

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Furnes O, Lie SA, Espehaug B et al (2001) Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987–99. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 83: 579–586

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gerritsma-Bleeker CL, Deutman R, Mulder TJ, Steinberg JD (2000) The Stanmore total hip replacement. A 22-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82: 97–102

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC (1979) "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop 17–27

  8. Hartofilakidis G (1997) Survival of the Charnley low-friction arthroplasty. A 12- to 24-year follow-up of 276 cases. Acta Orthop Scand [Suppl] 275: 27–29

    Google Scholar 

  9. Herberts P, Malchau H (2000) Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement: a review of the Swedish THR Register comparing 160,000 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 71: 111–121

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mossing N, Holm NJ (1979) [Total hip replacement using the Stanmore prosthesis]. Ugeskr Laeger 141: 495–499

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Onsten I, Akesson K, Obrant KJ (1995) Micromotion of the acetabular component and periacetabular bone morphology. Clin Orthop 103–110

  12. Scales JT, Wilson JN (1969) Some aspects of the development of the Stanmore total hip joint prosthesis. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 11: 20–39

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sochart DH (2000) The Stanmore total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 82: 1204–1205

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sorensen KH, Neumann L, Freund KG (1996) [Long-term results after Charnley hip replacement]. Ugeskr Laeger 158: 7228–7232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Unger AS, Inglis AE, Ranawat CS, Johanson NA (1987) Total hip arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. A long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2: 191–197

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. T. van der Lugt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Lugt, J.C.T., Onstenk, R. & Nelissen, R.G.H.H. Primary Stanmore total hip arthroplasty with increased cup loosening in rheumatoid patients. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 27, 291–293 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0473-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-003-0473-6

Keywords

Navigation