Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated pericardial disease: a systematic review of case reports

  • Research Report
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can be complicated by cardiovascular toxicity, including pericardial disease. To date, no prospective studies specifically investigated the optimal treatment of ICI-associated pericardial disease, and the available evidence is based on case reports and series only. We performed a systematic review of case reports and series including 20 publications for a total of 28 cases of ICI-associated pericardial disease. In this review, pericardial disease was reversible in the majority of cases (75%), although 2 deaths were reported. The majority of cases were life-threatening (G4, 53.6%) or severe (G3, 21.4%), requiring pericardiocentesis. Higher rates of improvement were associated with administration of corticosteroids (86.7% vs 61.5%), presence of other immune-related adverse events (90.9% vs. 64.7%), and non-malignant effusions (86.7% vs 42.8%). ICIs were discontinued in the majority of cases and then restarted in 7 patients with no recurrence of pericardial disease. Based on these results, ICI-associated G3–G4 pericardial disease as well as G2 pericardial disease with moderate–severe effusion should be treated with ICIs discontinuation and high-dose steroids, also performing pericardiocentesis, pericardial drainage or pericardial window in case of cardiac tamponade. For G2 with small effusion or G1 pericardial disease, ICIs might be continued and colchicine or NSAIDs could be considered. For patients requiring ICIs discontinuation, a rechallenge with ICIs seems to be feasible after resolution or meaningful improvement of pericardial disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data and materials are included in the present publication.

References

  1. Ribas A, Wolchok JD (2018) Cancer immunotherapy using checkpoint blockade. Science 359(6382):1350–1355. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4060

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ribas A (2012) Tumor immunotherapy directed at PD-1. N Engl J Med 366(26):2517–2519. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMe1205943

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Inno A, Metro G, Bironzo P et al (2017) Pathogenesis, clinical manifestations and management of immune checkpoint inhibitors toxicity. Tumori 103(5):405–421. https://doi.org/10.5301/tj.5000625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyon AR, Yousaf N, Battisti NML, Moslehi J, Larkin J (2018) Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiovascular toxicity. Lancet Oncol 19(9):e447–e458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30457-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hu JR, Florido R, Lipson EJ, et al. Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors [published correction appears in Cardiovasc Res. 2019 Apr 15;115(5):868]. Cardiovasc Res 2019;115(5):854–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz026

  6. Salem JE, Manouchehri A, Moey M et al (2018) Cardiovascular toxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: an observational, retrospective, pharmacovigilance study. Lancet Oncol 19(12):1579–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30608-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chahine J, Collier P, Maroo A, Tang WW, Klein AL (2020) Myocardial and pericardial toxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients. J Am Coll Cardiol Case Rep 2(2):191–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccas.2019.11.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Canale ML, Camerini A, Casolo G et al (2020) Incidence of pericardial effusion in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy. Adv Ther 37(7):3178–3184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-020-01386-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Brahmer JR, Lacchetti C, Schneider BJ et al (2018) Management of immune-related adverse events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 36(17):1714–1768. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.77.6385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Haanen JBAG, Carbonnel F, Robert C et al (2017) Management of toxicities from immunotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 28(suppl_4):iv119–iv142. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx225. Erratum in: Ann Oncol 2018; 29(Suppl 4):iv264–iv266. Erratum in: Ann Oncol 2018;29 Suppl 4:iv264–iv266

  11. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/CTCAE_v5_Quick_Reference_5x7.pdf

  12. Altan M, Toki MI, Gettinger SN et al (2019) Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated pericarditis. J Thorac Oncol 14(6):1102–1108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2019.02.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Asai M, Kato Y, Kawai S et al (2019) Management of cardiac tamponade during nivolumab of lung cancer with intrapericardial bleomycin: case report. Immunotherapy 11(6):467–472. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2019-0003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Atallah-Yunes SA, Kadado AJ, Soe MH (2019) Pericardial effusion due to pembrolizumab-induced immunotoxicity: a case report and literature review. Curr Probl Cancer 43(5):504–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2019.01.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chu YC, Fang KC, Chen HC et al (2017) Pericardial tamponade caused by a hypersensitivity response to tuberculosis reactivation after anti-PD-1 treatment in a patient with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 12(8):e111–e114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2017.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dasanu CA, Jen T, Skulski R (2017) Late-onset pericardial tamponade, bilateral pleural effusions and recurrent immune monoarthritis induced by ipilimumab use for metastatic melanoma. J Oncol Pharm Pract 23(3):231–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155216635853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. de Almeida DVP, Gomes JR, Haddad FJ, Buzaid AC (2018) Immune-mediated pericarditis with pericardial tamponade during nivolumab therapy. J Immunother 41(7):329–331. https://doi.org/10.1097/CJI.0000000000000217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dhenin A, Samartzi V, Lejeune S, Seront E (2019) Cascade of immunologic adverse events related to pembrolizumab treatment. BMJ Case Rep. 12(6):e229149. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-229149

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Khan AM, Munir A, Thalody V, Munshi MK, Mehdi S (2019) Cardiac tamponade in a patient with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma treated with pembrolizumab. Immunotherapy 11(18):1533–1540. https://doi.org/10.2217/imt-2019-0067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kolla BC, Patel MR (2016) Recurrent pleural effusions and cardiac tamponade as possible manifestations of pseudoprogression associated with nivolumab therapy—a report of two cases. J Immunother Cancer 4:80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-016-0185-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kushnir I, Wolf I (2017) Nivolumab-induced pericardial tamponade: a case report and discussion. Cardiology 136(1):49–51. https://doi.org/10.1159/000447053

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nesfeder J, Elsensohn AN, Thind M, Lennon J, Domsky S (2016) Pericardial effusion with tamponade physiology induced by nivolumab. Int J Cardiol 222:613–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oristrell G, Bañeras J, Ros J, Muñoz E (2018) Cardiac tamponade and adrenal insufficiency due to pembrolizumab: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2(2):tyt038. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/yty038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Saade A, Mansuet-Lupo A, Arrondeau J et al (2019) Pericardial effusion under nivolumab: case-reports and review of the literature [published correction appears in J Immunother Cancer 7(1):335 (2019)]. J Immunother Cancer 7(1):266. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40425-019-0760-4

  25. Shaheen S, Mirshahidi H, Nagaraj G, Hsueh CT (2018) Conservative management of nivolumab-induced pericardial effusion: a case report and review of literature. Exp Hematol Oncol 7:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-018-0104-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Tachihara M, Yamamoto M, Yumura M, Yoshizaki A, Kobayashi K, Nishimura Y (2019) Non-parallel anti-tumour effects of pembrolizumab: a case of cardial tamponade. Respirol Case Rep. 7(3):e00404. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcr2.404

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Vittorio A, Sharma R, Siejka D, Bhattarai K, Hardikar A (2018) Recurrent pericardial effusion while receiving nivolumab for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma: case report and review of the literature. Clin Lung Cancer 19(5):e717–e720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2018.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yamasaki M, Daido W, Saito N et al (2019) Pericardial effusion with tamponade in lung cancer patients during treatment with nivolumab: a report of two cases. Front Oncol 9:4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yun S, Vincelette ND, Mansour I, Hariri D, Motamed S (2015) Late onset ipilimumab-induced pericarditis and pericardial effusion: a rare but life threatening complication. Case Rep Oncol Med 2015:794842. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/794842

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zarogoulidis P, Chinelis P, Athanasiadou A et al (2017) Possible adverse effects of immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer; treatment and follow-up of three cases. Respir Med Case Rep 22:101–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2017.07.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Palaskas N, Morgan J, Daigle T et al (2019) Targeted cancer therapies with pericardial effusions requiring pericardiocentesis focusing on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Am J Cardiol 123(8):1351–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ala CK, Klein AL, Moslehi JJ (2019) Cancer treatment-associated pericardial disease: epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management. Curr Cardiol Rep 21(12):156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-019-1225-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Adler Y, Charron P (2015) The 2015 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J 36(42):2873–2874. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors did not receive funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Inno.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Inno, A., Maurea, N., Metro, G. et al. Immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated pericardial disease: a systematic review of case reports. Cancer Immunol Immunother 70, 3041–3053 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-02938-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-021-02938-z

Keywords

Navigation