Skip to main content

Predictive value of serum VEGF levels for elderly patients or for patients with poor performance status receiving anti-PD-1 antibody therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Abstract

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in elderly and poor performance status (PS) patients is controversial, because clinical evidence is limited. This study aimed to find a predictive biomarker for the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies in these patient populations. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who were ≥ 75 years of age or classified as PS 2 and received anti-PD-1 antibody treatment between December 2015 and May 2018. We evaluated the association between the efficacy of the anti-PD-1 antibody in these patients and the clinical variables thought to affect ICI efficacy. A total of 235 patients with advanced NSCLC were treated with anti-PD-1 antibodies, among whom 31 patients were ≥ 75 years of age and 22 were PS 2. A Cox proportional hazard model showed that only high levels of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly associated with a shorter progression-free survival in patients aged ≥ 75 years and those with PS 2. Among these cohorts, the overall response rate to anti-PD-1 treatment tended to be lower when serum VEGF was high compared to patients with low serum VEGF. Our results demonstrate that serum VEGF concentration may be a negative predictive biomarker in elderly and poor PS advanced NSCLC patients receiving anti-PD-1 antibody treatment. This finding may help identify patients who will not benefit from anti-PD-1 antibody therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

DCR:

Disease control rate

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group

HR:

Hazard ratio

ICI:

Immune checkpoint inhibitor

NR:

Not reached

NSCLC:

Non-small-cell lung cancer

ORR:

Overall response rate

OS:

Overall survival

PD-1:

Programmed cell death 1

PD-L1:

Programmed death-ligand 1

PFS:

Progression-free survival

PS:

Performance status

VEGF:

Vascular endothelial growth factor

References

  1. Brahmer J, Reckamp KL, Baas P et al (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373:123–135. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1504627

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Borghaei H, Paz-Ares L, Horn L et al (2015) Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373:1627–1639. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1507643

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Herbst RS, Baas P, Kim D-W et al (2016) Pembrolizumab versus docetaxel for previously treated, PD-L1-positive, advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (KEYNOTE-010): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 387:1540–1550. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01281-7

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reck M, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Robinson AG et al (2016) Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 375:1823–1833. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1606774

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A et al (2015) Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science. 348:124–128. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1348

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rittmeyer A, Barlesi F, Waterkamp D et al (2017) Atezolizumab versus docetaxel in patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (OAK): a phase 3, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial. The Lancet 389:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32517-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Spigel D, Schwartzberg L, Waterhouse D et al (2017) P3.02c-026 is nivolumab safe and effective in elderly and PS2 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? Results of CHECKMAte 153. J Thoracic Oncol 12:S1287–S1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2016.11.1821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gandara DR, Kowanetz M, Mok TSK et al (2017) 1295OBlood-based biomarkers for cancer immunotherapy: tumor mutational burden in blood (bTMB) is associated with improved atezolizumab (atezo) efficacy in 2L + NSCLC (POPLAR and OAK). Ann Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Taniguchi Y, Tamiya A, Isa SI et al (2017) Predictive factors for poor progression-free survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. Anticancer Res. 37:5857–5862. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12030

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Feng PH, Chen KY, Huang YC et al (2018) Bevacizumab reduces S100A9-positive MDSCs linked to intracranial control in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 13:958–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2018.03.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ziogas AC, Gavalas NG, Tsiatas M et al (2012) VEGF directly suppresses activation of T cells from ovarian cancer patients and healthy individuals via VEGF receptor Type 2. Int J Cancer 130:857–864. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.26094

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Voron T, Marcheteau E, Pernot S, Colussi O, Tartour E, Taieb J, Terme M (2014) Control of the immune response by pro-angiogenic factors. Front Oncol 4:70. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2014.00070

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Oyama T, Ran S, Ishida T, Nadaf S, Kerr L, Carbone DP, Gabrilovich DI (1998) Vascular endothelial growth factor affects dendritic cell maturation through the inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B activation in hemopoietic progenitor cells. J Immunol. 160:1224–1232

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gabrilovich DI, Chen HL, Girgis KR, Cunningham HT, Meny GM, Nadaf S, Kavanaugh D, Carbone DP (1996) Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells. Nat Med 2:1096–1103

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Nefedova Y, Huang M, Kusmartsev S, Bhattacharya R, Cheng P, Salup R, Jove R, Gabrilovich D (2003) Hyperactivation of STAT3 is involved in abnormal differentiation of dendritic cells in cancer. J Immunol 172:464–474. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.172.1.464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Makker V, Rasco D, Vogelzang NJ et al (2019) Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with advanced endometrial cancer: an interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 20:711–718. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30020-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Herbst RS, Arkenau H-T, Santana-Davila R et al (2019) Ramucirumab plus pembrolizumab in patients with previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, gastro-oesophageal cancer, or urothelial carcinomas (JVDF): a multicohort, non-randomised, open-label, phase 1a/b trial. Lancet Oncol 20:1109–1123. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30458-9

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tamiya M, Tamiya A, Inoue T et al (2018) Metastatic site as a predictor of nivolumab efficacy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicenter trial. PLoS ONE 13:e0192227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192227

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Shibaki R, Murakami S, Shinno Y et al (2019) Malignant pleural effusion as a predictor of the efficacy of anti-PD-1 antibody in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Thorac Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.13004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Wallis CJD, Butaney M, Satkunasivam R, Freedland SJ, Patel SP, Hamid O, Pal SK, Klaassen Z (2019) Association of patient sex with efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and overall survival in advanced cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5904

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Abdel-Rahman O (2018) Smoking and EGFR status may predict outcomes of advanced NSCLC treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors beyond first line: a meta-analysis. Clin Respir J. 12:1809–1819. https://doi.org/10.1111/crj.12742

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Buder-Bakhaya K, Hassel JC (2018) Biomarkers for clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment-a review from the melanoma perspective and beyond. Front Immunol 9:1474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.01474

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Garon EB, Rizvi NA, Hui R et al (2015) Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 372:2018–2028. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1501824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yuan J, Zhou J, Dong Z et al (2014) Pretreatment serum VEGF is associated with clinical response and overall survival in advanced melanoma patients treated with ipilimumab. Cancer Immunol Res 2:127–132. https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6066.cir-13-0163

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Inoue T, Tamiya M, Tamiya A et al (2018) Analysis of early death in Japanese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab. Clin Lung Cancer 19:e171–e176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2017.09.002

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shiroyama T, Suzuki H, Tamiya M et al (2018) Pretreatment advanced lung cancer inflammation index (ALI) for predicting early progression in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Med 7:13–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.1234

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gandhi L, Rodriguez-Abreu D, Gadgeel S et al (2018) Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 378:2078–2092. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1801005

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu Y, Wei J, Chen X, Qin Y, Mao R, Song J, Fan Y (2019) Comprehensive transcriptome profiling in elderly cancer patients reveals aging-altered immune cells and immune checkpoints. Int J Cancer 144:1657–1663. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31875

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Popat S, Ardizzoni A, Ciuleanu T et al (2017) Nivolumab in previously treated patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC: results of a European single-arm, phase 2 trial (CheckMate 171) including patients aged 70 years and with poor performance status. Ann Oncol 28:10

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lin Q, Guo L, Lin G, Chen Z, Chen T, Lin J, Zhang B, Gu X (2015) Clinical and prognostic significance of OPN and VEGF expression in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 39:539–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2015.05.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Naikoo NA, Rasool R, Shah S, Ahangar AG, Siddiqi MA, Shah ZA (2017) Upregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its role in progression and prognosis of non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Genet 216–217:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergen.2017.07.005

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Farhat FS, Tfayli A, Fakhruddin N, Mahfouz R, Otrock ZK, Alameddine RS, Awada AH, Shamseddine A (2012) Expression, prognostic and predictive impact of VEGF and bFGF in non-small cell lung cancer. Crit Rev Oncol 84:149–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2012.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RS contributed to the collection of clinical data, data quality control, statistical data analysis, interpretation of results, and writing of the manuscript. SM interpreted the results and participated in writing the manuscript. YS, YM, TY, YG, SK, HH, YF, Nobuyuki Y, Noboru Y, and YO contributed to manuscript writing and editing. All authors have approved the manuscript’s final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuji Murakami.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Shuji Murakami has served on speakers’ bureaus for Taiho Pharmaceutical and Ono Pharmaceutical. Yasushi Goto has held consulting/advisory roles for Taiho Pharmaceutical; served on speakers’ bureaus for Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD); and received research funding from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Ono Pharmaceutical. Shintaro Kanda has received research funding from Ono Pharmaceutical and honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb. Hidehito Horinouchi has received research funding from MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ono Pharmaceutical, and Taiho Pharmaceutical. Yutaka Fujiwara has received research funding from MSD and served on speakers’ bureaus for MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Ono Pharmaceutical. Nobuyuki Yamamoto has held consulting/advisory roles for Taiho Pharmaceutical; served on speakers’ bureaus for Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and MSD; and received honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical and MSD. Noboru Yamamoto has received research funding from Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Ono Pharmaceutical; and served on speakers’ bureaus for Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical. Yuichiro Ohe has received research funding from Taiho Pharmaceutical and MSD and honoraria from Taiho Pharmaceutical and MSD. All remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards described in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards (No. 2018–268).

Informed consent

Informed consent was not obtained from each patient, because this retrospective analysis of existing data did not require any interaction with patients and did not intervene in their treatment.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

262_2020_2539_MOESM1_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 1 Patient selection for (a) elderly and (b) ECOG PS 2 cohorts. ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD-1, programmed cell death 1 (TIFF 996 kb)

262_2020_2539_MOESM2_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 2 Receiver operating characteristic curves for serum VEGF based on progression for three months. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (TIFF 1794 kb)

262_2020_2539_MOESM3_ESM.tif

Supplementary Fig. 3 Kaplan–Meier curves of TTF for (a) elderly and (b) ECOG PS 2 patients. TTF, time to treatment failure; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor (TIFF 1794 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shibaki, R., Murakami, S., Shinno, Y. et al. Predictive value of serum VEGF levels for elderly patients or for patients with poor performance status receiving anti-PD-1 antibody therapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Immunother 69, 1229–1236 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02539-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-020-02539-2

Keywords

  • Anti-PD-1 antibody
  • Elderly
  • Non-small-cell lung cancer
  • Performance status
  • Vascular endothelial growth factor