Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The experience of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective case series

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Melanomas in Chinese patients show relatively higher rates of acral and mucosal types than in other populations. However, the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor therapies against these melanoma subtypes is not well defined. We analyzed 52 patients treated with ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, or a combination of both to evaluate the efficacy and safety of checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with advanced melanoma, particularly those with acral and mucosal types. The objective response rates (ORRs) were 0, 25, and 20% for ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, and pembrolizumab plus ipilimumab, respectively. Pembrolizumab contained therapy was as effective in acral and mucosal melanoma patients (ORR 26.7 and 20%, respectively) as in non-acral cutaneous melanoma patients (ORR 26.7%). Baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels and relative lymphocyte counts were independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. The incidences of grade 3–4 adverse events were 14% in the two monotherapy groups and 30% in the combined therapy group. The most frequent adverse events were elevation of aminotransferase, skin toxicity, thyroid dysfunction, pyrexia, and fatigue. Treatment-related rash or vitiligo was associated with a better prognosis. In summary, pembrolizumab-based therapy resulted in meaningful efficacy and good tolerability in Chinese patients with melanoma, including those with acral and mucosal types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ASTA:

Spartate aminotransferase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

CSD:

Chronic sun-derived

CR:

Completeremission

CTCAE:

National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

DCR:

Disease control rate

ECOG:

Eastern Cooperative Group

Ipi:

Ipilimumab

NR:

Not reached

OS:

Overall survival

ORR:

Objective response rate

Pem:

Pembrolizumab

PR:

Partial remission

PFS:

Progression-free survival

RECIST:

Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors

RLC:

Relative lymphocyte count

REC:

Relative eosinophil count

SD:

Stable disease

ULN:

Upper limit of normal

References

  1. Garbe C, Eigentler TK, Keilholz U, Hauschild A, Kirkwood JM (2011) Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects. Oncologist 16:5–24

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Schadendorf D, Hodi FS, Robert C, Weber JS, Margolin K, Hamid O, Patt D, Chen TT, Berman DM, Wolchok JD (2015) Pooled analysis of long-term survival data from phase II and phase III trials of ipilimumabin unresectable or metastatic melanoma. J ClinOncol 33:1889–1894

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hamid O, Robert C, Daud A et al (2013) Safety and tumor responses with lambrolizumab (anti-PD-1) in melanoma. N Engl J Med 369:134–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Topalian SL, Sznol M, McDermott DF et al (2014) Survival, durable tumor remission, and long-term safety in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab. J ClinOncol 32:1020–1030

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolchok JD, Kluger H, Callahan MK et al (2013) Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 369:122–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Larkin J, Chiarion-Sileni V, Gonzalez R et al (2015) Combined nivolumaband ipilimumabor monotherapy in untreated melanoma. N Engl J Med 373:23–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Long GV, Atkinson V, Cebon JS et al (2016) Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus ipilimumab (ipi) for advanced melanoma: Results of the KEYNOTE-029 expansion cohort. J ClinOncol 34(suppl 15):9506 (ASCO Annual Meeting abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chi Z, Li S, Sheng X, Si L, Cui C, Han M, Guo J (2011) Clinical presentation, histology, and prognoses of malignant melanoma in ethnic Chinese: a study of 522 consecutive cases. BMC Cancer 11:85

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Curtin JA, Fridlyand J, Kageshita T et al (2005) Distinct sets of genetic alterations in melanoma. N Engl J Med 353:2135–2147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Furney SJ, Turajlic S, Stamp G et al (2013) Genome sequencing of mucosal melanomas reveals that they are driven by distinct mechanisms from cutaneous melanoma. J Pathol 230:261–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Furney SJ, Turajlic S, Stamp G et al (2014) The mutational burden of acral melanoma revealed by whole-genome sequencing and comparative analysis. Pigment Cell. Melanoma Res 27:835–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shoushtari AN, Munhoz RR, Kuk D et al (2016) The efficacy of anti-PD-1 agents in acral and mucosal melanoma. Cancer 22:3354–3362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wu P, Wu D, Li L, Chai Y, Huang J (2015) PD-L1 and survival in solid tumors: a meta-analysis. PLoS One 10:e0131403. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0131403

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Ribas A, Puzanov I, Dummer R et al (2015) Pembrolizumab versus investigator-choice chemotherapy for ipilimumab-refractory melanoma (KEYNOTE-002): a randomised, controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 16:908–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robert C, Ribas A, Wolchok JD et al (2014) Anti-programmed-death-receptor-1 treatment with pembrolizumab in ipilimumab-refractory advanced melanoma: a randomised dose-comparison cohort of a phase 1 trial. Lancet 384:1109–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Daud AI, Wolchok JD, Robert C et al (2016) Programmed death-ligand 1 expression and response to the anti-programmed death 1 antibody pembrolizumab in melanoma. J Clin Oncol 34:4102–4109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Festino L, Botti G, Lorigan P, Masucci GV, Hipp JD, Horak CE, Melero I, Ascierto PA (2016) Cancer treatment with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents: Is PD-L1 expression a biomarker for patient selection? Drugs 76:925–945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Madore J, Vilain RE, Menzies AM et al (2015) PD-L1 expression in melanoma shows marked heterogeneity within and between patients: implications for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 clinical trials. Pigment Cell. Melanoma Res 28:245–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Diem S, Kasenda B, Spain L, Martin-Liberal J, Marconcini R, Gore M, Larkin J (2016) Serum lactate dehydrogenase as an early marker for outcome in patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma. Br J Cancer 114:256–261

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Weide B, Martens A, Hassel JC et al (2016) Baseline biomarkers for outcome of melanoma patients treated with pembrolizumab. Clin Cancer Res. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0127

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hua C, Boussemart L, Mateus C et al (2016) Association of vitiligo with tumor response in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with pembrolizumab. JAMA Dermatol 152:45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sanlorenzo M, Vujic I, Daud A, Algazi A, Gubens M, Luna SA, Lin K, Quaglino P, Rappersberger K, Ortiz-Urda S (2015) Pembrolizumabcutaneous adverse events and their association with disease progression. JAMA Dermatol 151:1206–1212

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrucci PF, Ascierto PA, Pigozzo J et al (2016) Baseline neutrophils and derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: prognostic relevance in metastatic melanoma patients receiving ipilimumab. Ann Oncol 27:732–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Boutros C, Tarhini A, Routier E et al (2016) Safety profiles of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies alone and in combination. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13:473–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wen X, Wang Y, Ding Y, Li D, Li J, Guo Y, Peng R, Zhao J, Zhang X, Zhang XS (2016) Safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with melanoma. Melanoma Res 26:284–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoshi Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This study received support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81272341).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The institutional review board at our hospital approved this study.

Informed consent

All patients provided written informed consent for this study.

Additional information

X. Wen and Y. Ding contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 729 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, X., Ding, Y., Li, J. et al. The experience of immune checkpoint inhibitors in Chinese patients with metastatic melanoma: a retrospective case series. Cancer Immunol Immunother 66, 1153–1162 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-017-1989-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-017-1989-8

Keywords

Navigation