Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the effect of NPO status on mucosal coating during double contrast barium esophagrams

  • Hollow Organ GI
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Current guidelines for double contrast barium esophagography studies (BAS) suggest that patients should be nil per os (NPO) prior to completing BAS for optimal esophageal coating, although the time required varies between practices and institutions. It is believed that consumption of food or water disrupts the ability for thick barium contrast to properly coat the esophageal mucosa. Exams that are rescheduled for this reason can lead to delays in care, without substantial evidence that NPO status truly affects esophageal mucosal coating for these exams with current barium mixtures.

Objective

The study aims to identify the necessity, or lack thereof, of standard NPO protocol in patients undergoing BAS, in effort to prevent unnecessary procedural delay.

Materials and methods

This study is an IRB-approved HIPAA-compliant study of 370 consecutive adult patients (115 male/255 female, mean age 55) who underwent BAS at our institution from January to June of 2022. Patients were divided into two groups: < 4 h NPO (n = 334), and ≥ 4 h NPO (n = 36). Four abdominal radiologists blinded to NPO interval independently reviewed a random sample of approximately 92 patients (91–94) and graded esophageal coating on a 4-point-scale with 1 being insufficient coating and 4 being optimal coating.

Results

No significant statistical difference in mean esophageal coating score was found between the ≥ 4 h NPO cohort (3.04 ± SD 0.78) and the < 4 h NPO cohort (2.97 ± SD 0.70; P = 0.54). Subset analysis of patients who were NPO for < 2 h (n = 9) also showed no significant difference in mean esophageal coating score (3.11 ± SD 0.6; P = 0.92), compared to the standard ≥ 4 NPO status.

Conclusion

Non-adherence to standard NPO protocol prior to BAS studies did not result in a significant difference in esophageal coating when compared to traditional preprocedural fasting of 4 or more hours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Debi, U., et al., Barium esophagogram in various esophageal diseases: A pictorial essay. Indian J Radiol Imaging, 2019. 29(2): p. 141-154.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Gyawali, C.P., et al., ACG Clinical Guidelines: Clinical Use of Esophageal Physiologic Testing. Am J Gastroenterol, 2020. 115(9): p. 1412-1428.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DiSantis, D.J., et al., Imaging Tips for Performing a Perfect Barium Swallow. Radiographics, 2019. 39(5): p. 1325-1326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colvin, S.D., et al., Same day barium esophagography and high-resolution manometry during the COVID-19 pandemic. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2022. 47(1): p. 76-84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rubin EB, M.T., L; Torres, WE., ACR Practice Parameter for the Performance of Esophagrams and Upper Gastrointestinal Examinations in Adults American College of Radiology.

  6. Levine, M.S. and S.E. Rubesin, History and Evolution of the Barium Swallow for Evaluation of the Pharynx and Esophagus. Dysphagia, 2017. 32(1): p. 55-72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anumandla, A., et al., Dysphagia and Reflux: Manometry versus Barium Swallow: 32. Official journal of the American College of Gastroenterology | ACG, 2010. 105: p. S12.

  8. Anderson, W., et al., Barium sulphate preparations for use in double contrast examination of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Br J Radiol, 1980. 53(636): p. 1150-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O'Connor, S.D., et al., Oral Contrast Adherence to Polyps on CT Colonography. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2006. 30(1): p. 51-57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA

    Hamad M. Muhammad

  2. Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA

    Ahmed M. Amer, Elainea N. Smith, Jessica G. Zarzour, David Summerlin, Desiree E. Morgan & Samuel J. Galgano

Authors
  1. Hamad M. Muhammad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed M. Amer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elainea N. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jessica G. Zarzour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. David Summerlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Desiree E. Morgan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Samuel J. Galgano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel J. Galgano.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 25 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muhammad, H.M., Amer, A.M., Smith, E.N. et al. Evaluating the effect of NPO status on mucosal coating during double contrast barium esophagrams. Abdom Radiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04304-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-024-04304-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation