Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic value of serum CA125 combined with PET/CT in ovarian cancer and tuberculous peritonitis in female patients

  • Special Section: Ovarian Cancer
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum CA125 combined with 18F-FDG PET/CT in ovarian cancer (OC) and tuberculous peritonitis (TBP) in female patients and to establish a diagnostic scoring system.

Method

A total of 86 female patients (64 OC and 22 TBP) were included in this study. Serum CA125, PET/CT maximal intensity projection (MIP), maximal standardized uptake value, ovarian mass, ascites volume, and other indicators were analyzed and a diagnostic scoring system was established according to the weights of statistically significant indicators.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that serum CA125 in OC and TBP patients were 2079.9 ± 1651.3 U/mL and 448.3 ± 349.5 U/mL (P < 0.001). In MIP images, abdominal lesions were focal distribution in 92.2% (59/64) of OC patients and diffuse distribution in 95.5% (21/22) of TBP patients (P < 0.001). Ovarian masses could be observed in 82.8% (53/64) OC patients and 31.8% (7/22) TBP patients (P <0.001). The other indicators were not statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that serum CA125 and MIP were independent risk factors for diagnosis. A diagnostic scoring system could be established based on serum CA125, MIP and ovarian mass, and the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.4% (63/64), 95.5% (21/22), 97.7% (84/86), 98.4% (63/64), and 95.5% (21/22), respectively.

Conclusion

Serum CA125 combined with PET/CT is of great value in the diagnosis of OC and TBP. A simple and efficient diagnostic scoring system can be established using serum CA125, MIP image feature, and ovarian mass.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer, 2019,144(8):1941-1953, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31937.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021,71(1):7-33, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dang YZ, Li X, Ma YX, Li XL, Yang T, Lu WL, Huang SG. 18F-FDG-PET/CT-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 42 FIGO III/IV ovarian cancer: A retrospective study. Oncol Lett, 2019,17(1):149-158, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dochez V, Caillon H, Vaucel E, Dimet J, Winer N, Ducarme G. Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review. J Ovarian Res, 2019,12(1):28, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0503-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S, Beller U. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2006,95: S161-192, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(06)60033-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeppernick F, Meinhold-Heerlein I. The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014,290(5):839-842, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3364-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu SG, Wang J, Sun JY, He ZY, Zhang WW, Zhou J. Real-World Impact of Survival by Period of Diagnosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Between 1990 and 2014. Front Oncol 2019; 9:639-648, https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00639.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Furin J, Cox H, Pai M. Tuberculosis. Lancet, 2019,393(10181):1642-1656, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30308-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chakaya J, Khan M, Ntoumi F, Aklillu E, Fatima R, Mwaba P, Kapata N, Mfinanga S, Hasnain SE, Katoto P, Bulabula A, Sam-Agudu NA, Nachega JB, Tiberi S, McHugh TD, Abubakar I, Zumla A. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020 - Reflections on the Global TB burden, treatment and prevention efforts. Int J Infect Dis 2021;113 S7-12, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.107.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Luo Y, Xue Y, Mao L, Lin Q, Tang G, Song H, Wang F, Sun Z. Diagnostic Value of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Peritonitis: A Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne), 2020; 7:180-190,https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang SB, Ji YH, Wu HB, Wang QS, Zhou WL, Lv L, Shou T, Hu J. PET/CT for differentiating between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis: The parietal peritoneum. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017,96(2):e5867, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shimamoto H, Hamada K, Higuchi I, Tsujihata M, Nonomura N, Tomita Y, Okuyama A, Aozasa K, Hatazawa J. Abdominal Tuberculosis: peritoneal involvement shown by F-18 FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med, 2007,32(9):716-718, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e318123f813.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Oge T, Ozalp SS, Yalcin OT, Kabukcuoglu S, Kebapci M, Arik D, Isikci T. Peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012,162(1):105-108, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Imtiaz S, Siddiqui N, Ahmad M, Jahan A. Pelvic-peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking ovarian cancer. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2012,22(2):113-115, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2012/JCPSP.113115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lataifeh I, Matalka I, Hayajneh W, Obeidat B, Al Zou'bi H, Abdeen G. Disseminated peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking advanced ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014,34(3):268-271, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2013.870140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chien JC, Fang CL, Chan WP. Peritoneal tuberculosis with elevated CA-125 mimicking ovarian cancer with carcinomatosis peritonei: Crucial CT findings. EXCLI J, 2016,15:711-715, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2016-625.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Moukit M, Fadel FA, Kouach J, Babahabib A, Dehayni M, Rahali DM. Pseudo-tumoral peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking ovarian cancer: an important differential diagnosis to consider. Pan Afr Med J, 2016,25:193-198, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.25.193.10929.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang H, Qu X, Liu X, Ding L, Yue Y. Female Peritoneal Tuberculosis with Ascites, Pelvic Mass, or Elevated CA 125 Mimicking Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2019,29(6):588-589, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.588.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Panoskaltsis TA, Moore DA, Haidopoulos DA, McIndoe AG. Tuberculous peritonitis: part of the differential diagnosis in ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000,182(3):740-742, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.103767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee CM, Choi JS, Kim M, Kang BK, Bae J, Lee WM, Jung US, Eom JM, Kim YK, Kim JY. Pretreatment CT differential diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis from peritoneal carcinomatosis of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1):1085, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27771-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Maheshwari A, Gupta S, Rai S, Rekhi B, Kelkar R, Shylasree TS, Menon S, Deodhar K, Thakur M, Das U, Gupta S, Tandon S. Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Patients with Peritoneal Tuberculosis Mimicking Advanced Ovarian Cancer. South Asian J Cancer, 2021, 10(2): 102-106, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Y, Wang Q, Wang X, Li X, Wu H, Wang Q, Yao Z, Miao W, Zhu X, Hua F, Zhang X, Cheng C, Zhang W, Hou Q, Li Y, Li XF. Expert Consensus on the clinical application of FDG PET/CT in infection and inflammation. Ann Nucl Med, 2020,34(5):369-376, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01449-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kouijzer I, Mulders-Manders CM, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Oyen W. Fever of Unknown Origin: the Value of FDG-PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med, 2018,48(2):100-107, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.11.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Singnurkar A, Poon R, Metser U. Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging in oncology: a systematic review. Ann Nucl Med, 2017,31(5):366-378, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1164-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanai FM, Bzeizi KI. Systematic review: tuberculous peritonitis--presenting features, diagnostic strategies and treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2005,22(8):685-700, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036. 2005. 02645.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sahin H, Isık H, Uygun Ilıkhan S, Tanrıverdi H, Bilici M. Disseminated tuberculosis in a non immun compromised patient with a complicated diagnosis. Respir Med Case Rep, 2015,14:1-3, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2014.11.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Su H, Li B, Ren W, Bao M, Wang P, Liu Q, Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhou H. Successful treatment of recurrent rectal implantation metastasis of ovarian cancer by natural orifice specimen extraction surgery: a case report. Onco Targets Ther, 2018,11:5925-5931, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S166535.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Guyon L, Ascencio M, Collinet P, Mordon S. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy of peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2012,9(1):16-31, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2011.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Delgado Bolton RC, Aide N, Colletti PM, Ferrero A, Paez D, Skanjeti A, Giammarile F. EANM guideline on the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, prognostic value, therapy assessment and restaging of ovarian cancer, endorsed by the American College of Nuclear Medicine (ACNM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021,48(10):3286-3302, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05450-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Meyers MA. Distribution of intra-abdominal malignant seeding: dependency on dynamics of flow of ascitic fluid. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med, 1973,119(1):198-206, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.119.1.198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bandiera E, Romani C, Specchia C, Zanotti L, Galli C, Ruggeri G, Tognon G, Bignotti E, Tassi RA, Odicino F, Caimi L, Sartori E, Santin AD, Pecorelli S, Ravaggi A. Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2011,20(12):2496-2506, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0635.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Holcomb K, Vucetic Z, Miller MC, Knapp RC. Human epididymis protein 4 offers superior specificity in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011,205(4):358.e1-6, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Henderson JT, Webber EM, Sawaya GF. Screening for Ovarian Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA, 2018,319(6):595-606, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.21421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Charkhchi P, Cybulski C, Gronwald J, Wong FO, Narod SA, Akbari MR. CA125 and Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel), 2020,12(12), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang L, Chen Y, Liu W, Wang K. Evaluating the clinical significances of serum HE4 with CA125 in peritoneal tuberculosis and epithelial ovarian cancer. Biomarkers, 2016,21(2):168-172, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/1354750X.2015.1118552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Chen R, Chen Y, Liu L, Zhou X, Liu J, Huang G. The Role of 1 8F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Peritoneal Thickening of Undetermined Origin. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016,95(15): e3023, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003023.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81641073) and the Yichang Medical and Health Research Project (No. A20-2-005)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guoliang Zeng or Wenli Dai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

According to the Declaration of Helsinki, the study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Yichang Central People’s Hospital (also known as the first Clinical Medical College of Three Gorges University) with approval number A20-2-005. And written informed consent for the publication of clinical data was obtained from the patient. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University, No. Z.20210125.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, P., Feng, Y., Qi, H. et al. Diagnostic value of serum CA125 combined with PET/CT in ovarian cancer and tuberculous peritonitis in female patients. Abdom Radiol 48, 3449–3457 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03997-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03997-9

Keywords

Navigation