Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic value of serum CA125 combined with 18F-FDG PET/CT in ovarian cancer (OC) and tuberculous peritonitis (TBP) in female patients and to establish a diagnostic scoring system.
Method
A total of 86 female patients (64 OC and 22 TBP) were included in this study. Serum CA125, PET/CT maximal intensity projection (MIP), maximal standardized uptake value, ovarian mass, ascites volume, and other indicators were analyzed and a diagnostic scoring system was established according to the weights of statistically significant indicators.
Results
Univariate analysis showed that serum CA125 in OC and TBP patients were 2079.9 ± 1651.3 U/mL and 448.3 ± 349.5 U/mL (P < 0.001). In MIP images, abdominal lesions were focal distribution in 92.2% (59/64) of OC patients and diffuse distribution in 95.5% (21/22) of TBP patients (P < 0.001). Ovarian masses could be observed in 82.8% (53/64) OC patients and 31.8% (7/22) TBP patients (P <0.001). The other indicators were not statistically significant. Logistic regression analysis showed that serum CA125 and MIP were independent risk factors for diagnosis. A diagnostic scoring system could be established based on serum CA125, MIP and ovarian mass, and the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 98.4% (63/64), 95.5% (21/22), 97.7% (84/86), 98.4% (63/64), and 95.5% (21/22), respectively.
Conclusion
Serum CA125 combined with PET/CT is of great value in the diagnosis of OC and TBP. A simple and efficient diagnostic scoring system can be established using serum CA125, MIP image feature, and ovarian mass.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer, 2019,144(8):1941-1953, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31937.
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin, 2021,71(1):7-33, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21654.
Dang YZ, Li X, Ma YX, Li XL, Yang T, Lu WL, Huang SG. 18F-FDG-PET/CT-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 42 FIGO III/IV ovarian cancer: A retrospective study. Oncol Lett, 2019,17(1):149-158, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2018.9601.
Dochez V, Caillon H, Vaucel E, Dimet J, Winer N, Ducarme G. Biomarkers and algorithms for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: CA125, HE4, RMI and ROMA, a review. J Ovarian Res, 2019,12(1):28, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-019-0503-7.
Heintz AP, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P, Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Creasman WT, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S, Beller U. Carcinoma of the ovary. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2006,95: S161-192, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(06)60033-7.
Zeppernick F, Meinhold-Heerlein I. The new FIGO staging system for ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal cancer. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2014,290(5):839-842, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3364-8.
Wu SG, Wang J, Sun JY, He ZY, Zhang WW, Zhou J. Real-World Impact of Survival by Period of Diagnosis in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Between 1990 and 2014. Front Oncol 2019; 9:639-648, https:// doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2019.00639.
Furin J, Cox H, Pai M. Tuberculosis. Lancet, 2019,393(10181):1642-1656, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30308-3.
Chakaya J, Khan M, Ntoumi F, Aklillu E, Fatima R, Mwaba P, Kapata N, Mfinanga S, Hasnain SE, Katoto P, Bulabula A, Sam-Agudu NA, Nachega JB, Tiberi S, McHugh TD, Abubakar I, Zumla A. Global Tuberculosis Report 2020 - Reflections on the Global TB burden, treatment and prevention efforts. Int J Infect Dis 2021;113 S7-12, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.107.
Luo Y, Xue Y, Mao L, Lin Q, Tang G, Song H, Wang F, Sun Z. Diagnostic Value of T-SPOT.TB Assay for Tuberculous Peritonitis: A Meta-Analysis. Front Med (Lausanne), 2020; 7:180-190,https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.585180.
Wang SB, Ji YH, Wu HB, Wang QS, Zhou WL, Lv L, Shou T, Hu J. PET/CT for differentiating between tuberculous peritonitis and peritoneal carcinomatosis: The parietal peritoneum. Medicine (Baltimore), 2017,96(2):e5867, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005867.
Shimamoto H, Hamada K, Higuchi I, Tsujihata M, Nonomura N, Tomita Y, Okuyama A, Aozasa K, Hatazawa J. Abdominal Tuberculosis: peritoneal involvement shown by F-18 FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med, 2007,32(9):716-718, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0b013e318123f813.
Oge T, Ozalp SS, Yalcin OT, Kabukcuoglu S, Kebapci M, Arik D, Isikci T. Peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking ovarian cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2012,162(1):105-108, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.02.010.
Imtiaz S, Siddiqui N, Ahmad M, Jahan A. Pelvic-peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking ovarian cancer. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2012,22(2):113-115, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2012/JCPSP.113115.
Lataifeh I, Matalka I, Hayajneh W, Obeidat B, Al Zou'bi H, Abdeen G. Disseminated peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking advanced ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2014,34(3):268-271, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/01443615.2013.870140.
Chien JC, Fang CL, Chan WP. Peritoneal tuberculosis with elevated CA-125 mimicking ovarian cancer with carcinomatosis peritonei: Crucial CT findings. EXCLI J, 2016,15:711-715, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17179/excli2016-625.
Moukit M, Fadel FA, Kouach J, Babahabib A, Dehayni M, Rahali DM. Pseudo-tumoral peritoneal tuberculosis mimicking ovarian cancer: an important differential diagnosis to consider. Pan Afr Med J, 2016,25:193-198, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2016.25.193.10929.
Wang H, Qu X, Liu X, Ding L, Yue Y. Female Peritoneal Tuberculosis with Ascites, Pelvic Mass, or Elevated CA 125 Mimicking Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 26 Cases. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak, 2019,29(6):588-589, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2019.06.588.
Panoskaltsis TA, Moore DA, Haidopoulos DA, McIndoe AG. Tuberculous peritonitis: part of the differential diagnosis in ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2000,182(3):740-742, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.103767.
Lee CM, Choi JS, Kim M, Kang BK, Bae J, Lee WM, Jung US, Eom JM, Kim YK, Kim JY. Pretreatment CT differential diagnosis of tuberculous peritonitis from peritoneal carcinomatosis of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Sci Rep, 2023, 13(1):1085, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27771-5.
Maheshwari A, Gupta S, Rai S, Rekhi B, Kelkar R, Shylasree TS, Menon S, Deodhar K, Thakur M, Das U, Gupta S, Tandon S. Clinical and Laboratory Characteristics of Patients with Peritoneal Tuberculosis Mimicking Advanced Ovarian Cancer. South Asian J Cancer, 2021, 10(2): 102-106, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1736030.
Li Y, Wang Q, Wang X, Li X, Wu H, Wang Q, Yao Z, Miao W, Zhu X, Hua F, Zhang X, Cheng C, Zhang W, Hou Q, Li Y, Li XF. Expert Consensus on the clinical application of FDG PET/CT in infection and inflammation. Ann Nucl Med, 2020,34(5):369-376, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-020-01449-8.
Kouijzer I, Mulders-Manders CM, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Oyen W. Fever of Unknown Origin: the Value of FDG-PET/CT. Semin Nucl Med, 2018,48(2):100-107, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2017.11.004.
Singnurkar A, Poon R, Metser U. Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/MR imaging in oncology: a systematic review. Ann Nucl Med, 2017,31(5):366-378, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s12149-017-1164-5.
Sanai FM, Bzeizi KI. Systematic review: tuberculous peritonitis--presenting features, diagnostic strategies and treatment. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2005,22(8):685-700, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036. 2005. 02645.x.
Sahin H, Isık H, Uygun Ilıkhan S, Tanrıverdi H, Bilici M. Disseminated tuberculosis in a non immun compromised patient with a complicated diagnosis. Respir Med Case Rep, 2015,14:1-3, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmcr.2014.11.001.
Su H, Li B, Ren W, Bao M, Wang P, Liu Q, Wang X, Zhou Z, Zhou H. Successful treatment of recurrent rectal implantation metastasis of ovarian cancer by natural orifice specimen extraction surgery: a case report. Onco Targets Ther, 2018,11:5925-5931, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S166535.
Guyon L, Ascencio M, Collinet P, Mordon S. Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy of peritoneal metastasis of ovarian cancer. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther, 2012,9(1):16-31, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2011.08.003.
Delgado Bolton RC, Aide N, Colletti PM, Ferrero A, Paez D, Skanjeti A, Giammarile F. EANM guideline on the role of 2-[18F]FDG PET/CT in diagnosis, staging, prognostic value, therapy assessment and restaging of ovarian cancer, endorsed by the American College of Nuclear Medicine (ACNM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021,48(10):3286-3302, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05450-9.
Meyers MA. Distribution of intra-abdominal malignant seeding: dependency on dynamics of flow of ascitic fluid. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med, 1973,119(1):198-206, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.119.1.198.
Bandiera E, Romani C, Specchia C, Zanotti L, Galli C, Ruggeri G, Tognon G, Bignotti E, Tassi RA, Odicino F, Caimi L, Sartori E, Santin AD, Pecorelli S, Ravaggi A. Serum human epididymis protein 4 and risk for ovarian malignancy algorithm as new diagnostic and prognostic tools for epithelial ovarian cancer management. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2011,20(12):2496-2506, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0635.
Holcomb K, Vucetic Z, Miller MC, Knapp RC. Human epididymis protein 4 offers superior specificity in the differentiation of benign and malignant adnexal masses in premenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2011,205(4):358.e1-6, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.05.017.
Henderson JT, Webber EM, Sawaya GF. Screening for Ovarian Cancer: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA, 2018,319(6):595-606, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.21421.
Charkhchi P, Cybulski C, Gronwald J, Wong FO, Narod SA, Akbari MR. CA125 and Ovarian Cancer: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel), 2020,12(12), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123730.
Zhang L, Chen Y, Liu W, Wang K. Evaluating the clinical significances of serum HE4 with CA125 in peritoneal tuberculosis and epithelial ovarian cancer. Biomarkers, 2016,21(2):168-172, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3109/1354750X.2015.1118552.
Chen R, Chen Y, Liu L, Zhou X, Liu J, Huang G. The Role of 1 8F-FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Peritoneal Thickening of Undetermined Origin. Medicine (Baltimore), 2016,95(15): e3023, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003023.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81641073) and the Yichang Medical and Health Research Project (No. A20-2-005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
According to the Declaration of Helsinki, the study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Yichang Central People’s Hospital (also known as the first Clinical Medical College of Three Gorges University) with approval number A20-2-005. And written informed consent for the publication of clinical data was obtained from the patient. The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Clinical Medical College of China Three Gorges University, No. Z.20210125.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, P., Feng, Y., Qi, H. et al. Diagnostic value of serum CA125 combined with PET/CT in ovarian cancer and tuberculous peritonitis in female patients. Abdom Radiol 48, 3449–3457 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03997-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03997-9