Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MRI defecography revisited. At-rest pelvic floor measurements with and without rectal gel. Is there a difference?

  • Pelvis
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

  • 5 Altmetric

Abstract

Purpose

The authors sought to test if there was a difference in key pelvic floor measurements obtained during MR defecography at-rest, i.e., H-line, M-line and anorectal angle (ARA), before and after rectal gel administration. The authors also sought to determine if any observed differences would affect the interpretation of the defecography studies.

Methods

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained. An abdominal fellow retrospectively reviewed the images of all patients who underwent MRI defecography at our institution from January 2018 through June 2021. The H-line, M-line and ARA values were remeasured on T2-weighted sagittal images, with and without rectal gel for each patient.

Results

One hundred and eleven (111) studies were included in the analysis. 18% (N = 20) of patients satisfied the criterion for pelvic floor widening before gel administration based on H-line measurement. This increased to 27% (N = 30) after rectal gel (p = 0.08). 14.4% (N = 16) met the M-line measurement criterion for pelvic floor descent before gel administration. This increased to 38.7% after rectal gel (N = 43) (p < 0.001). 67.6% (N = 75) demonstrated an abnormal ARA prior to administration of rectal gel. This decreased to 58.6% (N = 65) after rectal gel administration (p = 0.07). The overall reporting discrepancies incurred by the presence or absence of rectal gel were 16.2%, 29.7% and 23.4% for H-line, M-line and ARA, respectively.

Conclusion

The instillation of gel during MR defecography can cause significant changes to the observed pelvic floor measurements at-rest. This in turn can influence the interpretation of defecography studies.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sung, V. W., & Hampton, B. S. (2009). Epidemiology of pelvic floor dysfunction. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America, 36(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2009.08.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Colaiacomo, M. C., Masselli, G., Polettini, E., Lanciotti, S., Casciani, E., Bertini, L., & Gualdi, G. (2009). Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor: a pictorial review. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 29(3), e35. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.e35.

  3. BURHENNE HJ. INTESTINAL EVACUATION STUDY: A NEW ROENTGENOLOGIC TECHNIQUE. Radiol Clin. 1964;33:79–84. PMID: 14129127.

  4. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB, Zerhouni EA. Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology. 1991;179(1):25-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lalwani, N., Khatri, G., EL Sayed, R.F. et al. MR defecography technique: recommendations of the society of abdominal radiology’s disease-focused panel on pelvic floor imaging. Abdom Radiol 46, 1351–1361 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02160-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Flusberg M, Sahni VA, Erturk SM, Mortele KJ. Dynamic MR defecography: assessment of the usefulness of the defecation phase. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Apr;196(4):W394-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4445. PMID: 21427302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schoenenberger AW, Debatin JF, Guldenschuh I, Hany TF, Steiner P, Krestin GP. Dynamic MR defecography with a superconducting, open-configuration MR system. Radiology. 1998 Mar;206(3):641-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.206.3.9494480. PMID: 9494480.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelsang RE, Rao SS, Welcher K. FECOM: a new artificial stool for evaluating defecation. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Jan;94(1):183-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00793.x. PMID: 9934752.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gurland BH, Khatri G, Ram R, Hull TL, Kocjancic E, Quiroz LH, Sayed RFE, Jambhekar KR, Chernyak V, Paspulati RM, Sheth VR, Steiner AM, Kamath A, Shobeiri SA, Weinstein MM, Bordeianou L; Members of the Expert Workgroup on Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Pelvic Floor Disorders. Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Oct;217(4):800–812. doi: https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.26488. Epub 2021 Sep 10. PMID: 34505543.

  10. Barbaric ZL, Marumoto AK, Raz S. Magnetic resonance imaging of the perineum and pelvic floor. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;12(2):83-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00002142-200104000-00002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Comiter CV, Vasavada SP, Barbaric ZL, Gousse AE, Raz S. Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology. 1999 Sep;54(3):454-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00165-x. PMID: 10475353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle J. The syndrome of the descending perineum. Proc R Soc Med. 1966 Jun;59(6):477–82. PMID: 5937925; PMCID: PMC1900931

  13. Ma S, Leu SY, Fang RH. Reconstruction of anorectal angle after abdominoperineal resection of rectum and anus--an animal model. Ann Plast Surg. 1989 Dec;23(6):519-22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198912000-00008. PMID: 2624395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hajivassiliou, C. A., Carter, K. B., & Finlay, I. G. (1996). Anorectal angle enhances faecal continence. Journal of British Surgery, 83(1), 53-56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahieu, P., Pringot, J. & Bodart, P. Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients. Gastrointest Radiol 9, 247–251 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887845

  16. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S, Stevenson GW. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications. Gut. 1989 Dec;30(12):1737-49. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.30.12.1737. PMID: 2612988; PMCID: PMC1434461.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zutshi M, Varma MG, Gurland BH, Steele SR. Consensus Statement of Definitions for Anorectal Physiology Testing and Pelvic Floor Terminology (Revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2018 Apr;61(4):421-427. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001070. PMID: 29521821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. García del Salto L, de Miguel Criado J, Aguilera del Hoyo LF et al (2014) MR imaging-based assessment of the female pelvic floor. Radiographics 34: 1417–1439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, 800 Rose Street, Lexington, KY, 40536-0293, USA

    Adrian Dawkins, Ahmed Sobieh, Charles Myers & Rashmi Nair

  2. Wheeling, USA

    Brian Schambach

Authors
  1. Adrian Dawkins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmed Sobieh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Charles Myers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Brian Schambach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rashmi Nair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Dawkins.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no financial or non-financial interests that are directly or indirectly related to the work submitted for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawkins, A., Sobieh, A., Myers, C. et al. MRI defecography revisited. At-rest pelvic floor measurements with and without rectal gel. Is there a difference?. Abdom Radiol 48, 1237–1245 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03849-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03849-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation