Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic ileal pouch emptying studies

  • Special Section: Ileal Pouch
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Although much radiologic literature has focused on the short-term post-operative complications associated with ileal pouches, as the number of patients with long-term pouches has grown, there is increasing realization of the functional deficits that may occur long after pouch creation. Dynamic pouch imaging using fluoroscopy and MRI can provide assessment of the underlying causes of symptomatic pouch dysfunction and can provide critical insight to the management of this complex patient population. In this paper, we provide an overview of the unique problems encountered in patients with long-term ileal pouches, and provide an overview of the techniques, interpretation, and reporting for fluoroscopic and MR pouch defecography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lorenzo G, Maurizio C, Maria LP, et al (2016) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis 20 years later: is it still a good surgical option for patients with ulcerative colitis? Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1835–1843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-016-2657-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee GC, Cavallaro PM, Savitt LR, et al (2020) Bowel Function After J-Pouch May Be More Complex Than Previously Appreciated: A Comprehensive Analysis to Highlight Existing Knowledge Gaps. Dis Colon Rectum 63:207–216. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001543

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Quinn KP, Tse CS, Lightner AL, et al (2017) Nonrelaxing Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Is an Underestimated Complication of Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 15:1242–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.02.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khanna R, Li Y, Schroeder T, et al (2013) Manometric evaluation of evacuatory difficulty (dyschezia) in ileal pouch patients. Inflamm Bowel Dis 19:569–575. https://doi.org/10.1097/MIB.0b013e31827e78d6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Church J (2019) The Implications of Pouch Physiology. Dis Colon Rectum 62:510–512. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ho Y-H, Seow-Choen F, Tan M (2001) Colonic J-pouch function at six months versus straight coloanal anastomosis at two years: Randomized controlled trial. World J Surg 25:876–881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-001-0044-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ide S, Araki T, Okita Y, et al (2017) Outcome and functional prognosis of pelvic sepsis after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis. Surg Today 47:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-016-1430-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stellingwerf ME, Maeda Y, Patel U, et al (2016) The role of the defaecating pouchogram in the assessment of evacuation difficulty after restorative proctocolectomy and pouch-anal anastomosis. Colorectal Dis 18:O292-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.13431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Quinn KP, Busciglio IA, Burton DD, et al (2022) Defining normal pouch function in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a pilot study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 55:1560–1568. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurland BH, Khatri G, Ram R, et al (2021) Consensus Definitions and Interpretation Templates for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Defecatory Pelvic Floor Disorders: Proceedings of the Consensus Meeting of the Pelvic Floor Disorders Consortium of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Society of Abdominal Radiology, the International Continence Society, the American Urogynecologic Society, the International Urogynecological Association, and the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons. AJR Am J Roentgenol 217:800–812. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.26488

  11. Flusberg M, Xi Y, Jambhekar K, et al (2021) Variability in utilization and techniques of pelvic floor imaging: findings of the SAR pelvic floor dysfunction disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:1294–1301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-02957-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prasad R, Gelder K, Wiles R (2019) The patient’s experience of defaecating proctography: Comparing magnetic resonance with conventional fluoroscopy techniques. Radiography (Lond) 25:24–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2018.07.002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Barakat B, Afzal A, Schweda D, Laali A (2020) Comparison of magnetic resonance defecography with pelvic floor ultrasound and vaginal inspection in the urogynecological diagnosis of pelvic floor dysfunction. Urol Ann 12:150–155. https://doi.org/10.4103/UA.UA_78_19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kjaer MD, Simonsen JA, Hvidsten S, et al (2015) Scintigraphic Small Intestinal Transit Time and Defaecography in Patients with J-Pouch. Diagnostics (Basel) 5:399–412. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics5040399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Reiner CS, Tutuian R, Solopova AE, et al (2011) MR defecography in patients with dyssynergic defecation: spectrum of imaging findings and diagnostic value. Br J Radiol 84:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/28989463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ng K-S, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM (2019) Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 25:4320–4342. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4320

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kiely JM, Fazio VW, Remzi FH, et al (2012) Pelvic sepsis after IPAA adversely affects function of the pouch and quality of life. Dis Colon Rectum 55:387–392. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0b013e318246418e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Kiran RP, Fazio VW (2009) Comparison of outcomes after hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in 3,109 patients. Surgery 146:723–729; discussion 729-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.06.041

  19. Fazio VW, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, et al (2013) Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis: Analysis of Outcome and Quality of Life in 3707 Patients. Annals of Surgery 257:679–685. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31827d99a2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Holder-Murray J, Fichera A (2009) Anal transition zone in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 15:769–773. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.769

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Annibali R, Oresland T, Hultén L (1994) Does the level of stapled ileoanal anastomosis influence physiologic and functional outcome? Dis Colon Rectum 37:321–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02053591

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khan F, Hull TL, Shen B (2018) Diagnosis and management of floppy pouch complex. Gastroenterology Report 6:246–256. https://doi.org/10.1093/gastro/goy021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kirat HT, Kiran RP, Remzi FH, et al (2011) Diagnosis and management of afferent limb syndrome in patients with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 17:1287–1290. https://doi.org/10.1002/ibd.21503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rao SSC, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, et al (2016) Anorectal Disorders. Gastroenterology 150:1430-1442.e4. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Segal JP, Chan H, Collins B, et al (2018) Biofeedback in patients with ileoanal pouch dysfunction: a specialist centre experience. Scand J Gastroenterol 53:665–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2018.1454508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. El Sayed RF, Alt CD, Maccioni F, et al (2017) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor dysfunction - joint recommendations of the ESUR and ESGAR Pelvic Floor Working Group. Eur Radiol 27:2067–2085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4471-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Freeha K, Bo S (2018) Complications Related to J-Pouch Surgery. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) 14:571–576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Joyce MR, Fazio VW, Hull TT, et al (2010) Ileal pouch prolapse: prevalence, management, and outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 14:993–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-010-1194-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shen B (2012) Acute and chronic pouchitis—pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 9:323–333. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2012.58

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin M. Ream.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ream, J.M., Luk, L., Sheedy, S. et al. Dynamic ileal pouch emptying studies. Abdom Radiol 48, 2956–2968 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03811-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-023-03811-6

Keywords

Navigation