Abstract
Purpose
To define the pancreatic thickness on the transverse plane and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values at multiple anatomical locations in the normal pancreas of children and to evaluate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability.
Methods
Two reviewers measured the thickness and ADC values of the pancreas at four locations obtained from two different 1,5 Tesla MRI scanners [MAGNETOM Symphony (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany) and Signa HDxt(GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA)]. Measurements were made based on 190 retrospective MRI examinations. Patients were distributed among ten age groups for thickness measurements and three age groups for ADC measurements between 0 and 18 years.
Results
The thickness measurements from each segment of the pancreas were significantly correlated with patient age, height and weight (p < 0.01). Inter-rater agreement was excellent for pancreatic head (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.837) and good for pancreatic neck, body and tail (ICC: 0.646, 0.632 and 0.678, respectively). We also defined the mean ADC values for three age groups. There was significant difference in the mean ADC value of the head and body by both the vendor and age group (p < 0.05). The mean ADC values and mean ranks of the Signa HDxt were significantly higher and the frequencies were lower than those of the MAGNETOM Symphony at all locations (p < 0.001).
Conclusion
The thickness of the pancreatic head is more reliable than that at other locations. Pancreatic body and tail measurements are not as reliable as head or neck measurements due to discrepancies between published studies and low interobserver agreement. ADC values of the normal pancreas can be significantly different among vendors; therefore, ADC comparison on follow-up should be performed using same MRI machine.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ADC:
-
Apparent diffusion coefficient
- DWI:
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging
- GRE:
-
Gradient-recalled echo
- SMV:
-
Superior mesenteric vein
- ROI:
-
Region of interest
- PACS:
-
Picture archiving and communication systems
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- SD:
-
Standard deviation
- ICC:
-
Intraclass correlation coefficient
References
Trout AT, Preet-Singh K, Anton CG, Koberlein GC, DiPaolo C, Dillman JR, Zhang B, Abu-El-Haija M. (2018) Normal pancreatic parenchymal thickness by CT in healthy children. Pediatr Radiol 48:1600-1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-018-4190-0.
Raghuwanshi S, Gupta R, Vyas MM, Sharma R (2016) CT Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis and its Prognostic Correlation with CT Severity Index. J Clin Diagn Res. 10: TC06-TC11. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/19849.7934.
Balthazar EJ, Ranson JH, Naidich DP, Megibow AJ, Caccavale R, Cooper MM (1985) Acute pancreatitis: prognostic value of CT. Radiology 156:767–772. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.156.3.4023241.
Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2007) Radiologic assessment of acute and chronic pancreatitis. Surg Clin North Am 87:1341-1358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2007.08.005.
Siegel MJ, Martin KW, Worthington JL (1987) Normal and abnormal pancreas in children: US studies. Radiology 165: 15–18. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.165.1.3306783.
Ueda D (1989) Sonographic measurement of the pancreas in children. J Clin Ultrasound 17: 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870170607.
Aydin S, Fatihoglu E, Karavas E, Kantarci M. (2021) Normal pancreatic thickness values in healthy children: an MRI study. Pancreatology. 21:1017-1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pan.2021.04.012.
Thomas S, Kayhan A, Lakadamyali H, Oto A. (2012) Diffusion MRI of acute pancreatitis and comparison with normal individuals using ADC values. Emerg Radiol 19:5–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-011-0983-2.
Taniguchi T, Kobayashi H, Nishikawa K, Iida E, Michigami Y, Morimoto E, Yamashita R, Miyagi K, Okamoto M. (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in autoimmune pancreatitis. Jpn J Radiol 27:138–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-008-0311-2.
Hallgren KA. (2012) Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor QuantMethods Psychol 8:23–34. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023.
Poddar U, Yachha SK, Borkar V, Srivastava A, Kumar S. (2017) A report of 320 cases of childhood pancreatitis: increasing incidence, etiologic categorization, dynamics, severity assessment, and outcome. Pancreas 46: 110-115. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0000000000000733.
Kıvrak AS, Paksoy Y, Erol C, Koplay M, Özbek S, Kara F. (2013) Comparison of apparent diffusion coefficient values among different MRI platforms: a multicenter phantom study. Diagn Interv Radiol 19:433–437. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2013.13034.
Sasaki M, Yamada K, Watanabe Y, Matsui M, Ida M, Fujiwara S, Shibata E; Acute Stroke Imaging Standardization Group-Japan (ASIST-Japan) Investigators. (2008) Variability in absolute apparent diffusion coefficient values across different platforms may be substantial: a multivendor, multi-institutional comparison study. Radiology. 249:624-630. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2492071681.
Bonekamp D, Nagae LM, Degaonkar M, Matson M, Abdalla WM, Barker PB, Mori S, Horská A. (2007) Diffusion tensor imaging in children and adolescents: reproducibility, hemispheric, and age-related differences. Neuroimage. 34:733-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.020.
Huisman TA, Loenneker T, Barta G, Bellemann ME, Hennig J, Fischer JE, Il'yasov KA. (2006) Quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain: field strength related variance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) scalars. Eur Radiol. 16:1651-1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0175-8.
Schwartz LH, Litière S, de Vries E et al (2016) RECIST 1.1-Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. 62:132–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081.
Hussien N, Hussien RS, Saad DHA, El Kassas M, Elkhatib WF, Ezz El Din M. (2022) The Role of MRI Pancreatic Protocol in Assessing Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer. Front Oncol. 11:796317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2021.796317.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that there is no support or financial disclosure from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ayaz, E., Ozkale Yavuz, O., Ozcan, H.N. et al. Are the thickness and ADC values reliable to evaluate pancreas in children? A retrospective MRI study. Abdom Radiol 48, 925–935 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03769-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03769-x