Abstract
Purpose
To describe the MRI features of rudimentary horn pregnancy (RHP) with surgical correlations.
Methods
Nine women with a RHP underwent preoperative pelvic MRI. MRI protocol included T2- (n = 9), T1- (n = 7), and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences (n = 4). Two pelvic radiologists retrospectively analyzed MR images to assess the following MRI features: presence of a myometrium around the gestational sac (GS) and characteristics of its wall, GS surrounded by myometrium in contact with the round ligament, communication of the GS with the endometrial cavity of the main horn, continuity of the GS with the cervix, fibrous or muscular GS attachment to the main horn, lateral deviation, and endometrial thickness of the main horn. Ovaries and tubes were also assessed. MRI features were correlated with surgical findings.
Results
Seven of the nine women [29 ± 6 SD years (range 16–37 years)] underwent surgical management. The first US diagnosed RHP in only 1/9 patients. All pregnancies were diagnosed using MRI. RHP was all located in the rudimentary horn of a unicornuate uterus. All the GS was surrounded by myometrium in contact with the round ligament. None of the RHP displayed communication with the endometrial cavity of the main horn nor with the cervix. An attachment between the RHP and the main horn was seen in 3/9 patients. All the main horns were lateralized and empty.
Conclusion
MRI diagnosed RHP in all patients by identifying the GS surrounded by myometrium in contact with the round ligament and the absence of continuity between the GS and the cervix.
Level of evidence
IV—retrospective study.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Nahum GG (2002) Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. The 20th-century worldwide experience of 588 cases. J Reprod Med. 47(2):151‑63.
Grimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. (2016) The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 13:1‑16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-015-0909-1.
Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? (1998) J Reprod Med. 43(10):877‑87.
Jayasinghe Y, Rane A, Stalewski H, Grover S. The presentation and early diagnosis of the rudimentary uterine horn (2005) Obstet Gynecol. 105(6):1456‑67. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000161321.94364.56.
Chopra S, Keepanasseril A, Rohilla M, Bagga R, Kalra J, Jain V. Obstetric morbidity and the diagnostic dilemma in pregnancy in rudimentary horn: retrospective analysis (2009) Arch Gynecol Obstet. 280(6):907‑10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1013-4.
Marten K, Vosshenrich R, Funke M, Obenauer S, Baum F, Grabbe E. MRI in the evaluation of müllerian duct anomalies (2003) Clin Imaging. 27(5):346‑50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00587-9.
Behr SC, Courtier JL, Qayyum A. Imaging of Müllerian Duct Anomalies (2012) RadioGraphics. 32(6):E233‑50. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125515.
Smolders D, Deckers F, Pouillon M, Vanderheyden T, Vanderheyden J, De Schepper A. Ectopic pregnancy within a rudimentary horn in a case of unicornuate uterus (2002) Eur Radiol. 12(1):121‑4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003300100939.
Siwatch S, Mehra R, Pandher DK, Huria A. Rudimentary horn pregnancy: a 10year experience and review of literature (2013) Arch Gynecol Obstet. 287(4):687‑95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2625-7.
Thurber BW, Fleischer AC. Ultrasound features of rudimentary horn ectopic pregnancies (2019) J Ultrasound Med. 38(6):1643‑7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14847.
Tsafrir A, Rojansky N, Sela HY, Gomori JM, Nadjari M. Rudimentary horn pregnancy: first-trimester prerupture sonographic diagnosis and confirmation by magnetic resonance imaging (2005) J Ultrasound Med. 24(2):219‑23. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.2.219.
Li X, Peng P, Liu X, Chen W, Liu J, Yang J, et al. The pregnancy outcomes of patients with rudimentary uterine horn: A 30-year experience (2019) PloS One. 14(1):e0210788. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210788.
Saquib S, Mohammed Talha WE. Successful management of abdominal pregnancy: two case reports (2018) Oman Med J. 33(2):171‑5. https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2018.32.
Hajji A, Toumi D, Laakom O, Cherif O, Faleh R. Early primary abdominal pregnancy: Diagnosis and management. A case report (2020) Int J Surg Case Rep. 73:303‑6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.07.048.
Mavrelos D, Sawyer E, Helmy S, Holland TK, Ben‑Nagi J, Jurkovic D. Ultrasound diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy in the non-communicating horn of a unicornuate uterus (cornual pregnancy) (2007) Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 30(5):765‑70. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.5131.
Fedele L, Bianchi S, Zanconato G, Berlanda N, Bergamini V. Laparoscopic removal of the cavitated noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn: surgical aspects in 10 cases (2005) Fertil Steril. 83(2):432‑6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.07.966.
Babu K, De J. Rupture of Rudimentary Horn Pregnancy (2007) Med J Armed Forces India. 63(1):75‑6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-1237(07)80119-5.
Srisajjakul S, Prapaisilp P, Bangchokdee S. Magnetic resonance imaging in tubal and non-tubal ectopic pregnancy (2017) Eur J Radiol. 93:76‑89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.023.
Poncelet É, Leconte C, Fréart-Martinez É, Laurent N, Lernout M, Bigot J, et al. Aspect échographique et IRM de la grossesse extra-utérine (2009) Imag Femme. 19(3):171‑8.
Parker RA, Yano M, Tai AW, Friedman M, Narra VR, Menias CO. MR imaging findings of ectopic pregnancy: a pictorial review (2012) RadioGraphics. 32(5):1445‑60. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.325115153.
Tamai K, Koyama T, Togashi K. MR features of ectopic pregnancy (2007) Eur Radiol. 17(12):3236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-007-0751-6.
Ramanathan S, Raghu V, Ladumor SB, Nagadi AN, Palaniappan Y, Dogra V, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of common, uncommon, and rare implantation sites in ectopic pregnancy (2018) Abdom Radiol (NY). 43(12):3425‑35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1604-2.
Ozeren S, Caliskan E, Corakci A, Ozkan S, Demirci A. Magnetic resonance imaging and angiography for the prerupture diagnosis of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy (2004) Acta Radiol. 45(8):878‑81. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850410008252.
Ray JG, Vermeulen MJ, Bharatha A, Montanera WJ, Park AL. Association between MRI exposure during pregnancy and fetal and childhood outcomes (2016) JAMA. 316(9):952‑61. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.12126.
Leyendecker JR, Gorengaut V, Brown JJ. MR imaging of maternal diseases of the abdomen and pelvis during pregnancy and the immediate postpartum period (2004) RadioGraphics. 24(5):1301‑16. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.245045036.
Monacci F, Lanfredini N, Zandri S, Strigini F, Luchi C, Giannini A, et al. Diagnosis and laparoscopic management of a 5-week ectopic pregnancy in a rudimentary uterine horn: A case report (2019) Case Rep Womens Health. 21:e00088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2018.e00088.
Bruand M, Thubert T, Winer N, Gueudry P, Dochez V. Rupture of noncommunicating rudimentary horn of uterus at 12 weeks’ gestation (2020) Cureus. 12(3):7191. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7191.
Yassin A, Munaza S, Mohammed A. Tale of rudimentary horn pregnancy: case reports and literature review (2019) J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 32(4):671‑6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1387533.
Rodrigues Â, Neves AR, Castro MG, Branco M, Geraldes F, Águas F. Successful management of a rudimentary uterine horn ectopic pregnancy by combining methotrexate and surgery: a case report (2019) Case Rep Womens Health. 24(e00158). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2019.e00158.
Nadi M, Richard C, Filipuzzi L, Bergogne L, Douvier S, Sagot P. Grossesse interstitielle, angulaire et cornuale : diagnostic, traitement et futur obstétrical. [Interstitial, angular and cornual pregnancies: Diagnosis, treatment and subsequent fertility] (2017) Gynecol Obstet Fertil Senol. 45(6):340‑7. French. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2017.05.002.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr N. MAINARD for his precious advice in the elaboration of this work
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
BH involved in writing—original draft. CH involved in review & editing, supervision, and validation. VF, OG, EP, PR, MB, and J-PL involved in resources and review & editing. EP involved in writing—review & editing, supervision, and validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hamet, B., Hoeffel, C., Fague, V. et al. Pregnancy in a rudimentary horn: multicenter’s MRI features of a rare condition. Abdom Radiol 47, 4195–4204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03658-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03658-3