Skip to main content
Log in

Safety of percutaneous, image-guided biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma with and without concurrent ablation

  • Special Section: Cross sectional interventions
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the prevalence of adverse events after image-guided biopsy of histologically proven hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) using a standardized, indirect access, coaxial biopsy technique.

Methods

In this IRB-approved, HIPAA compliant, and retrospective study, we evaluated all consecutive adult patients from 2011 to 2016 who underwent image-guided biopsy of HCC with and without concurrent ablation. Tumor seeding was defined as any new lesion along the needle tract on subsequent imaging. Adverse events were graded using both the Clavien–Dindo Complication Classification system and the most recently proposed Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Adverse Event Classification System.

Results

A total of 383 patients underwent 398 biopsies (64 ± 11 years; 112 women, 271 men). Most patients (282; 71%) underwent concurrent ablation. Adverse events occurred after 18 biopsies (4.5%): 13 were Grade I (Clavien–Dindo) or minor (SIR) and included hematoma (7), hepatic vein thrombus (2), portal vein thrombus (2), moderate pleural effusion (1), and small pneumothorax (1). The remaining 5 (1.3%) adverse events were classified as Grade II–IIIa (Clavien–Dindo) or moderate (SIR) and included hematoma requiring blood products (n = 1), arrhythmia (n = 1), and symptomatic pleural effusions requiring treatment (n = 3). Baseline age, sex, cause of liver disease, HCC diameter, and HCC grade were not associated with adverse events. There were no tumor seeding events after a median follow-up of 611 days (interquartile range of 211–1104).

Conclusion

Percutaneous image-guided tissue sampling using a standardized, indirect access, coaxial technique can be performed safely with and without concurrent ablation by trained cross-sectional interventional radiologists at a tertiary liver transplant center.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brar G, Greten TF, Graubard BI et al. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Survival by Etiology: A SEER-Medicare Database Analysis. Hepatology Communications. 2020; 4(10): 1541-1551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cunha GM, Hosseini M, Furlan A, Fowler K. Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging: Differences Between Radiologic and Pathologic Systems and Relevance to Patient Selection and Outcomes in Liver Transplantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.21.26436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A et al. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients. Radiology. 2018; 289(3): 816-83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kamath A, Roudenko A, Hecht E et al. CT/MR LI-RADS 2018: clinical implications and management recommendations. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2019; 44(4): 1306-1322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Heimbach JK, Kulik LM, Finn RS et al. AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2018; 67(1): 358-380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rebouissou S, Nault JC. Advances in molecular classification and precision oncology in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2020; 72(2): 215-229.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Di Tommaso L, Spadaccini M, Donadon M, et al. Role of liver biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2019; 25(40): 6041-6052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rastogi A. Changing role of histopathology in the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2018; 24(35): 4000-4013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Finn RS. The role of liver biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol. 2016; 14(10): 759-761.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stigliano R, Marelli L, Yu D, Davies N, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Seeding following percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma. What is the risk and the outcome? Seeding risk for percutaneous approach of HCC. Cancer Treat Rev 2007; 33: 437–447.

  11. Silva MA, Hegab B, Hyde C, Guo B, Buckels JA, Mirza DF. Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2008; 57(11): 1592-1596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee WJ, et al. Needle-tract implantation in hepatocellular carcinoma: frequency and CT findings after biopsy with a 19.5-gauge automated biopsy gun. Abdom Imaging 2000; 25: 246–250.

  13. Chang S, Kim SH, Lim HK, Lee WJ, Choi D, Lim JH. Needle tract implantation after sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation of doubling time, frequency, and features on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 185(2): 400-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stigliano R, Marelli L, Yu D, Davies N, Patch D, Burroughs AK. Seeding following percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma. What is the risk and the outcome? Seeding risk for percutaneous approach of HCC. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007; 33(5): 437–447.

  15. Llovet JM, Vilana R, Brú C et al. Increased risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for single hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 2001; 33(5): 1124-1129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Imamura J, Tateishi R, Shiina S et al. Neoplastic seeding after radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103(12): 3057-3062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ishii H, Okada S, Okusaka T et al. Needle tract implantation of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous ethanol injection. Cancer. 1998; 82(9): 1638-1642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240(2): 205-213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Khalilzadeh O, Baerlocher MO, Shyn PB et al. Proposal of a New Adverse Event Classification by the Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017; 28(10): 1432-1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoon SH, Lee JM, So YH, Hong SH, Kim SJ, Han JK, Choi BI. Multiphasic MDCT enhancement pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma smaller than 3 cm in diameter: tumor size and cellular differentiation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193(6): 482-489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boyum JH, Atwell TD, Wall DJ et al. Incidence of major hemorrhage after aggressive image-guided liver mass biopsy in the era of individualized medicine. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018; 44: 2067-2073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boyum JH, Atwell TD, Schmit GD et al. Incidence and risk factors for adverse events related to image-guided liver biopsy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016; 91(3): 329-335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson EG, Baxter G. Tumour seeding following percutaneous needle biopsy: the real story! Clin Radiol. 2011; 66(11): 1007-1014.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maturen KE, Nghiem HV, Marrero JA, et al. Lack of tumor seeding of hepatocellular carcinoma after percutaneous needle biopsy using coaxial cutting needle technique. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006; 187(5): 1184-1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mueller C, Waldburger N, Stampfl U et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma revisited. Gut. 2018; 67(5): 991-993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Caturelli E, Solmi L, Anti M et al. Ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy of early hepatocellular carcinoma complicating liver cirrhosis: a multicentre study. Gut. 2004; 53(9): 1356-62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahn DW, Shim JH, Yoon JH et al. Treatment and clinical outcome of needle-track seeding from hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatol. 2011; 17(2): 106-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu J, Liang P, Yu XL, Cheng ZG, Han ZY, Dong BW. Needle track seeding after percutaneous microwave ablation of malignant liver tumors under ultrasound guidance: analysis of 14-year experience with 1462 patients at a single center. Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81(10): 2495-2499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fuks D, Cauchy F, Fusco G, Paradis V, Durand F, Belghiti J. Preoperative tumour biopsy does not affect the oncologic course of patients with transplantable HCC. J Hepatol. 2014; 61(3): 589-593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justin R. Tse.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tse, J.R., Terashima, K., Shen, L. et al. Safety of percutaneous, image-guided biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma with and without concurrent ablation. Abdom Radiol 47, 2640–2646 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03494-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03494-5

Keywords

Navigation