Skip to main content
Log in

Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in oncology patients receiving gadoxetic acid and updated risk of estimate of NSF in patients receiving gadoxetic acid with moderate and severe renal impairment

  • Practice
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Gadoxetic acid (GA) is a half-biliary excreted gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administered at lower dose than gadobenic acid with similar ionic structure. Gadobenic acid is considered low-risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients with impaired renal function; however, safety of GA is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of NSF in oncology patients undergoing GA-enhanced MRI and to update the risk estimate of NSF in patients receiving GA with severe renal impairment.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively identified GA-enhanced MRI performed for treatment planning in confirmed cancer patients between March 2011 and December 2020. Serum creatinine values within 180 days of GA administration were retrieved and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated. The eGFR value nearest to each MRI examination was used. The search result was linked to a prospectively maintained registry of reported cases of NSF. An updated literature review was conducted to identify published cases of NSF related to GA administration in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or on dialysis) and the incidence of NSF with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was determined combining published data with our results.

Results

192 oncology patients underwent GA-enhanced MRI, mean age was 65.6 ± 11.8 years with 73 women. The mean eGFR was 89.6 ± 33.0 mL/min/1.73 m2. There were 33 patients with moderate (eGFR 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and 1 patient with severe (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal impairment. There were no reported cases of NSF. Updated literature review including our results identified 340 patients with severe renal impairment or on dialysis with zero cases of NSF (0/340; 95% confidence intervals 0% and 0.9%).

Conclusion

No cases of NSF were documented in this study related to gadoxetic acid use in oncology patients, including those with moderate and severe renal impairment. Recent data indicate use of gadoxetic acid in patients with renal impairment can be considered low-risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schieda N, Blaichman JI, Costa AF, et al. Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69(2):136–50.

  2. Mao Y, Chen B, Wang H, et al. Diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):1969.

  3. Elsayes KM, Kielar AZ, Agrons MM, et al. Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: an expert consensus statement. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2017;4:29–39.

  4. Nair VJ, Szanto J, Vandervoort E, et al. Feasibility, detectability and clinical experience with platinum fiducial seeds for MRI/CT fusion and real-time tumor tracking during CyberKnife((R)) stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. J Radiosurg SBRT. 2015;3(4):315–23.

  5. Boldrini L, Corradini S, Gani C, et al. MR-Guided Radiotherapy for Liver Malignancies. Frontiers in Oncology. 2021;11(1053).

  6. Schieda N, Blaichman JI, Costa AF, et al. Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists. Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2018;5:2054358118778573.

  7. Schieda N, Maralani PJ, Hurrell C, Tsampalieros AK, Hiremath S. Updated Clinical Practice Guideline on Use of Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019;70(3):226–32.

  8. Attari H, Cao Y, Elmholdt TR, Zhao Y, Prince MR. A Systematic Review of 639 Patients with Biopsy-confirmed Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis. Radiology. 2019;292(2):376–86.

  9. Pharmaceuticals B. Global use of Gadoxetic Acid 2019.

  10. Radiology ACo. Manual on Contrast Media v10.3; Chapter 15 Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis (NSF). 2017 [cited 2017 August 10]; Available from: https://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/Contrast-Manual/Contrast_Media.pdf/#page=88.

  11. Mathur M, Jones JR, Weinreb JC. Gadolinium Deposition and Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: A Radiologist's Primer. Radiographics. 2019:190110.

  12. Canada Go. Gadolinium-Containing Contrast Agents - Update on Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis/Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy (NSF/NFD) - Notice to Hospitals. Ottawa, Canada: Health Canada; 2013 [cited 2017 August 1]; Available from: http://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2013/36711a-eng.php.

  13. Schieda N, van der Pol CB, Walker D, et al. Adverse Events to the Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent Gadoxetic Acid: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology. 2020:200073.

  14. Starekova J, Bruce RJ, Sadowski EA, Reeder SB. No Cases of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis after Administration of Gadoxetic Acid. Radiology. 2020;297(3):556–62.

  15. Tseng TY, Tseng JH, Huang BS, et al. Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in patients with impaired renal function undergoing fixed-dose gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021;46(8):3995–4001.

  16. Malyszko J, Tesarova P, Capasso G, Capasso A. The link between kidney disease and cancer: complications and treatment. Lancet. 2020;396(10246):277–87.

  17. Floege J, Barbour SJ, Cattran DC, et al. Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 1): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. 2019;95(2):268–80.

  18. Girardi M, Kay J, Elston DM, Leboit PE, Abu-Alfa A, Cowper SE. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: clinicopathological definition and workup recommendations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011;65(6):1095–106 e7.

  19. Higgins JPT GS. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. 2011.

  20. Woolen SA, Shankar PR, Gagnier JJ, MacEachern MP, Singer L, Davenport MS. Risk of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis in Patients With Stage 4 or 5 Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving a Group II Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2019.

  21. Feng Z, Zhao H, Guan S, Wang W, Rong P. Diagnostic performance of MRI using extracellular contrast agents versus gadoxetic acid for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Liver Int. 2021;41(5):1117–28.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola Schieda.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gauthier, I.D., Macleod, C.A., Sathiadoss, P. et al. Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in oncology patients receiving gadoxetic acid and updated risk of estimate of NSF in patients receiving gadoxetic acid with moderate and severe renal impairment. Abdom Radiol 47, 1196–1201 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03367-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03367-3

Keywords

Navigation