Skip to main content
Log in

Financial and medicolegal implications of focused/fast abdominopelvic MRI exams

  • Perspective
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Abbreviated MRI offers significant advantages in terms of MRI throughput, patient tolerance and expediency, and is being utilized for a variety of abdominopelvic imaging applications. However questions abound with respect to financial and medicolegal treatment of these relatively new protocols.

Methods

A review of the relevant literature was performed.

Results

There is no Current Procedural Terminology code for a “limited” MRI study, but it may not be appropriate to bill an abbreviated study the same as a more comprehensive study. With respect to medicolegal concerns, the risk of liability when missing or misinterpreting medically significant findings due to use of an abbreviated scan will turn on whether abbreviated MRI has become the standard of care.

Conclusion

In light of these ambiguities, it would behoove abdominopelvic imagers to advocate for their professional and subspecialty organizations to issue practice parameters/guidelines with respect to the utilization of abbreviated MRI protocols, and for the subspecialty to bill these abbreviated scans at objectively reasonable rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Granata V, Grassi R, Fusco R, Setola SV, Belli A, Piccirillo M, Pradella S, Giordano M, Cappabianca S, Brunese L, Grassi R, Petrillo A, Izzo F, Abbreviated MRI Protocol for the Assessment of Ablated Area in HCC Patients, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 3598, https://mdpi.com/journal/ijerph (2021)

  2. Olson MC, Violi NV, Taouli B, Venkatesh SK, Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols in the Abdomen and Pelvis, Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin N. Am. 28 (2020) 381-394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Granata V, Fusco R, Avallone A, Cassata A, Palaia R, Delrio P, Grassi R, Tatangelo F, Grazzini G, Izzo F, Petrillo A, Abbreviated MRI protocol for colorectal liver metastases: How the radiologist could work in pre surgical setting, PLoS One 15(11): e0241431 (Nov. 19 2020).

  4. Torkzad MR, Riddell AM, Chau I, Cunningham D, Koh DM, Clinical Performance of Abbreviated Liver MRI for the Follow-Up of Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases, Am. J. Roentg. 2021; 216:669-676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Canellas R, Rosenkranz AB, Taouli B, Sala E, Saini S, Pedrosa I, Wang ZJ, Sahani DV, Abbreviated MRI Protocols for the Abdomen, Radiographics 39;3, 744–758 (May-June 2019)

  6. Cicero G, Mondello S, Wichmann JL, Albrecht MH, Vogl TJ, Cavallaro M, Frosina L, D'Angelo T, Mazziotti S. Fast Magnetic Resonance Enterography Protocol for the Evaluation of Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Pilot Study. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2020 May 2;10:25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jhaveri KS, Sagheb S, Guimaraes L, Krishna S, Ahari AF, Espin-Garcia O. Evaluation of Crohn Disease Activity Using a Potential Abbreviated MRE Protocol Consisting of Balanced Steady-State Free Precession MRI Only Versus Full-Protocol MRE. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Feb;216(2):384-392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Islam, G.M.N., Yadav, T., Khera, P.S. et al, Abbreviated MRI in patients with suspected acute appendicitis in emergency: a prospective study. Abdom Radiol (2021).

  9. Oh KY, Gilfeather M, Kennedy A, Glastonbury C, Green D, Brant W, Yoon HC, Limited Abdominal MRI in the Evaluation of Acute Right Upper Quadrant Pain, Abdom Imaging 28:643-651 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Frequently Asked Questions Update 2021, quoting AMA/ACR Clinical Examples in Radiology, Fall 2018, https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Advocacy/2021-Breast-Imaging-Frequently-Asked-Questions-(1).pdf. Accessed 5 Dec 2021.

  11. Marshall H, Pham R, Sieck L, Plecha D, Implementing Abbreviated MRI Screening Into a Breast Imaging Practice, Am. J. Roentg. 2019; 213 234–7 at 235.

  12. Eisenberg RL, Radiology and the Law: Malpractice and Other Issues, Springer-Verlag, New York (2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Mezrich J, Legal Perspective: Surgeons and Imaging – are Self-Reads a Mistake? Am. J. of Surg. (2012) 204, 545-547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. See e.g. Mezrich J, Sometimes Less is More – Data Acquisition and its Impact on Liability, Clin. Imaging. Jan-Feb 2019; 53:v-vi. Epub 2018 Jun 9.

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Each author substantially contributed to the conception and design of this work, the writing and revision of this manuscript, approved the final version of the manuscript and is accountable for the manuscript’s contents.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan L. Mezrich.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no disclosures with respect to this manuscript. The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mezrich, J.L., Weinreb, J.C. Financial and medicolegal implications of focused/fast abdominopelvic MRI exams. Abdom Radiol 47, 471–474 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03328-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03328-w

Keywords

Navigation