Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

MRI is the most commonly used imaging modality for HCC screening at a tertiary care transplant center

  • Hepatobiliary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

In this study, we describe the patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening with imaging and factors associated with imaging modality selection in a tertiary care transplant center.

Methods

This was a retrospective study where all adult patients with cirrhosis and/or chronic hepatitis B virus infection referred for HCC screening with ultrasound (US), CT or MRI were identified during 2017. The association between imaging methods, demographic/clinical data were analyzed by uni- and multivariate analysis.

Results

A total of 1437 patients were included (median age 61y, 59% male, median BMI 27.5 kg/m2, median AFP 3.4 ng/mL, 37% with HCV and 87% with cirrhosis). Index screening imaging method utilization included MRI (51%), US (33%) and CT (16%). Use of US as the index imaging modality for screening was significantly associated with race/ethnicity [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.71–2.01, all p < 0.05] in multivariate analysis. Presence of cirrhosis (OR 0.29, p < 0.001) and referral by a hepatologist (OR 0.23, p < 0.001) were associated with screening with MRI in the multivariate analysis; while gender, age, BMI, etiology and income at ZIP code of residence were not significantly associated with imaging modality selection. HCC was observed in 62 patients (prevalence 4.3%). Rate of HCC detection was significantly higher with MRI vs US (5.9% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.001).

Conclusion

MRI was the most frequently used modality (> 50%) for HCC screening in our tertiary care center, in contrast with the current practice guidelines. Race/ethnicity, cirrhosis and referral by a hepatologist were associated with the imaging method used for HCC screening.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data is available for review.

Change history

  • 06 December 2021

    The co-author “Naik Vietti Violi” family name has been incorrectly tagged in the xml. However it is now corrected.

Abbreviations

AASLD:

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

AFP:

Alpha fetoprotein

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CT:

Computed Tomography

EASL:

European Association for the study of the Liver

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

IQR:

Interquartile range

LI-RADS:

Liver Reporting and Data System

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OR:

Odds Ratio

UNOS:

United Network for Organ Sharing

US:

Ultrasound

USA:

United States of America

ZIP:

Zone Improvement Plan

References

  1. Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, Altekruse SF, Ward JW, Jemal A, Sherman RL, Henley SJ, Holtzman D, Lake A, Noone AM, Anderson RN, Ma J, Ly KN, Cronin KA, Penberthy L, Kohler BA (2016) Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2012, featuring the increasing incidence of liver cancer. Cancer 122 (9):1312-1337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29936

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu J (2018) Trends in Liver Cancer Mortality Among Adults Aged 25 and Over in the United States, 2000-2016. NCHS Data Brief (314):1-8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ, Cronin KA, Ma J, Ryerson B, Mariotto A, Lake AJ, Wilson R, Sherman RL, Anderson RN, Henley SJ, Kohler BA, Penberthy L, Feuer EJ, Weir HK (2017) Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2014, Featuring Survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 109 (9). doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx030

  4. Zhang BH, Yang BH, Tang ZY (2004) Randomized controlled trial of screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 130 (7):417-422. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-004-0552-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McGlynn KA, Petrick JL, London WT (2015) Global epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: an emphasis on demographic and regional variability. Clin Liver Dis 19 (2):223-238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cld.2015.01.001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, Roberts LR, Heimbach JK (2018) Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 68 (2):723-750. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address eee, European Association for the Study of the L (2018) EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 69 (1):182-236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodgers SK, Fetzer DT, Gabriel H, Seow JH, Choi HH, Maturen KE, Wasnik AP, Morgan TA, Dahiya N, O'Boyle MK, Kono Y, Sirlin CB, Kamaya A (2019) Role of US LI-RADS in the LI-RADS Algorithm. Radiographics 39 (3):690-708. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kono Y, Joshi K, K R, M OB (2015) Ultrasound In HCC Surveillance: What is the Quality of Ultrasound and What Factors Affect Quality? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Institute for Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), Orlando, Florida,

  10. Wang Y, Mi J, Shan XY, Wang QJ, Ge KY (2007) Is China facing an obesity epidemic and the consequences? The trends in obesity and chronic disease in China. Int J Obes (Lond) 31 (1):177-188. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803354

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM (2014) Prevalence of Childhood and Adult Obesity in the United States, 2011-2012. JAMA 311 (8):806-814

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Simmons O, Fetzer DT, Yokoo T, Marrero JA, Yopp A, Kono Y, Parikh ND, Browning T, Singal AG (2017) Predictors of adequate ultrasound quality for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 45 (1):169-177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.13841

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzartzeva K, Obi J, Rich NE, Parikh ND, Marrero JA, Yopp A, Waljee AK, Singal AG (2018) Surveillance Imaging and Alpha Fetoprotein for Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Cirrhosis: A Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 154 (6):1706–1718 e1701. doi:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.064

  14. Kim SY, An J, Lim YS, Han S, Lee JY, Byun JH, Won HJ, Lee SJ, Lee HC, Lee YS (2017) MRI With Liver-Specific Contrast for Surveillance of Patients With Cirrhosis at High Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. JAMA oncology 3 (4):456-463. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Joshi K, Mendler M, Gish R, Loomba R, Kuo A, Patton H, Kono Y (2014) Hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: a national survey of current practices in the USA. Dig Dis Sci 59 (12):3073-3077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-014-3256-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Colli A, Fraquelli M, Casazza G, Massironi S, Colucci A, Conte D, Duca P (2006) Accuracy of ultrasonography, spiral CT, magnetic resonance, and alpha-fetoprotein in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (3):513-523

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Arguedas MR, Chen VK, Eloubeidi MA, Fallon MB (2003) Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis: a cost-utility analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 98 (3):679-690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Kamaya A, Kielar AZ, Elsayes KM, Bashir MR, Kono Y, Do RK, Mitchell DG, Singal AG, Tang A, Sirlin CB (2018) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Version 2018: Imaging of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in At-Risk Patients. Radiology 289 (3):816-830. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2018181494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Clinical-Resources/LIRADS/Chapter-10--Staging.pdf?la=en.

  20. Glickman ME, Rao SR, Schultz MR (2014) False discovery rate control is a recommended alternative to Bonferroni-type adjustments in health studies. J Clin Epidemiol 67 (8):850-857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/technical-documentation/table-and-geography-changes/2018/1-year.html.

  22. Kudo M, Izumi N, Kokudo N, Matsui O, Sakamoto M, Nakashima O, Kojiro M, Makuuchi M, Hepatology HCCEPoJSo (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: Consensus-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) 2010 updated version. Dig Dis 29 (3):339-364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000327577

  23. Omata M, Lesmana LA, Tateishi R, Chen PJ, Lin SM, Yoshida H, Kudo M, Lee JM, Choi BI, Poon RT, Shiina S, Cheng AL, Jia JD, Obi S, Han KH, Jafri W, Chow P, Lim SG, Chawla YK, Budihusodo U, Gani RA, Lesmana CR, Putranto TA, Liaw YF, Sarin SK (2010) Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver consensus recommendations on hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Int 4 (2):439-474. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-010-9165-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hernaez R, Kanwal F, El-Serag HB (2018) Hepatocellular carcinoma screening is associated with survival benefit in silico but needs confirmation in an in vivo analysis. Hepatology 68 (1):7-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29776

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moon AM, Weiss NS, Beste LA, Su F, Ho SB, Jin GY, Lowy E, Berry K, Ioannou GN (2018) No Association Between Screening for Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Reduced Cancer-Related Mortality in Patients With Cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 155 (4):1128–1139 e1126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.06.079

  26. Singal AG, Conjeevaram HS, Volk ML, Fu S, Fontana RJ, Askari F, Su GL, Lok AS, Marrero JA (2012) Effectiveness of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance in patients with cirrhosis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21 (5):793-799. doi:https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-1005

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang W, Wei C (2020) Advances in the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Dis 7 (3):308-319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gendis.2020.01.014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Singal AG, Mittal S, Yerokun OA, Ahn C, Marrero JA, Yopp AC, Parikh ND, Scaglione SJ (2017) Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Associated with Early Tumor Detection and Improved Survival Among Patients with Cirrhosis in the US. Am J Med 130 (9):1099–1106 e1091. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.021

  29. Mittal S, Kanwal F, Ying J, Chung R, Sada YH, Temple S, Davila JA, El-Serag HB (2016) Effectiveness of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice: A United States cohort. J Hepatol 65 (6):1148-1154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.07.025

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Lima PH, Fan B, Berube J, Cerny M, Olivie D, Giard JM, Beauchemin C, Tang A (2019) Cost-Utility Analysis of Imaging for Surveillance and Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol:1–9. doi:https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18.20341

  31. Pocha C, Dieperink E, McMaken KA, Knott A, Thuras P, Ho SB (2013) Surveillance for hepatocellular cancer with ultrasonography vs. computed tomography -- a randomised study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 38 (3):303–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.12370

  32. Andersson KL, Salomon JA, Goldie SJ, Chung RT (2008) Cost effectiveness of alternative surveillance strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6 (12):1418-1424

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Goossens N, Bian CB, Hoshida Y (2017) Tailored algorithms for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: Is one-size-fits-all strategy outdated? Curr Hepatol Rep 16 (1):64-71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11901-017-0336-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Goossens N, Singal AG, King LY, Andersson KL, Fuchs BC, Besa C, Taouli B, Chung RT, Hoshida Y (2017) Cost-Effectiveness of Risk Score-Stratified Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening in Patients with Cirrhosis. Clinical and translational gastroenterology 8 (6):e101. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.26

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19 (3):329-338. doi:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1007122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sharing UNfO (2000) Policy 3.6. Allocation of livers. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Health Resources and Services.

  37. Singal AG, Yopp A, C SS, Packer M, Lee WM, Tiro JA (2012) Utilization of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance among American patients: a systematic review. Journal of general internal medicine 27 (7):861-867. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1952-x

  38. Singal AG, Li X, Tiro J, Kandunoori P, Adams-Huet B, Nehra MS, Yopp A (2015) Racial, social, and clinical determinants of hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. Am J Med 128 (1):90 e91–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.07.027

  39. Ku E, Lee BK, McCulloch CE, Roll GR, Grimes B, Adey D, Johansen KL (2019) Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Kidney Transplant Access within a Theoretical Context of Medical Eligibility. Transplantation. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002962

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mathur AK, Schaubel DE, Gong Q, Guidinger MK, Merion RM (2010) Racial and ethnic disparities in access to liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 16 (9):1033-1040. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.22108

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Vietti Violi N, Lewis S, Liao J, Hulkower M, Hernandez-Meza G, Smith K, Babb JS, Chin X, Song J, Said D, Kihira S, Sirlin CB, Reeder SB, Bashir MR, Fowler KJ, Ferket BS, Sigel K, Taouli B (2020) Gadoxetate-enhanced abbreviated MRI is highly accurate for hepatocellular carcinoma screening. Eur Radiol 30 (11):6003-6013. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07014-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Vietti Violi N, Fowler KJ, Sirlin CB, Taouli B (2021) Abbreviated Magnetic Resonance Imaging for HCC Surveillance. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken) 17 (3):133-138. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cld.1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Marks RM, Ryan A, Heba ER, Tang A, Wolfson TJ, Gamst AC, Sirlin CB, Bashir MR (2015) Diagnostic per-patient accuracy of an abbreviated hepatobiliary phase gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204 (3):527-535. doi:https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.14.12986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Besa C, Lewis S, Pandharipande PV, Chhatwal J, Kamath A, Cooper N, Knight-Greenfield A, Babb JS, Boffetta P, Padron N, Sirlin CB, Taouli B (2017) Hepatocellular carcinoma detection: diagnostic performance of a simulated abbreviated MRI protocol combining diffusion-weighted and T1-weighted imaging at the delayed phase post gadoxetic acid. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42 (1):179-190. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0841-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Xu RH, Wei W, Krawczyk M, Wang W, Luo H, Flagg K, Yi S, Shi W, Quan Q, Li K, Zheng L, Zhang H, Caughey BA, Zhao Q, Hou J, Zhang R, Xu Y, Cai H, Li G, Hou R, Zhong Z, Lin D, Fu X, Zhu J, Duan Y, Yu M, Ying B, Zhang W, Wang J, Zhang E, Zhang C, Li O, Guo R, Carter H, Zhu JK, Hao X, Zhang K (2017) Circulating tumour DNA methylation markers for diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Mater 16 (11):1155-1161. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GHM, NVV and BT—study concept and design, data analysis, writing. EN, DV, SZM, JF—data collection and proofing. TDS, PB, SF, AB—writing and proofing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bachir Taouli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

BT: consultancy and/or advisory roles for Bayer, Helio Health; Research funding/support: Bayer, Takeda, Regeneron, Echosens.

Ethical approval

IRB waiver.

Consent for publication

This manuscript has been approved by all co-authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez-Meza, G., Vietti Violi, N., Said, D. et al. MRI is the most commonly used imaging modality for HCC screening at a tertiary care transplant center. Abdom Radiol 46, 5142–5151 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03212-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03212-7

Keywords

Navigation