Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integrating multiparametric MRI radiomics features and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for bladder cancer grading

  • Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Pathological grade is important for the treatment selection and outcome prediction in bladder cancer (BCa). We aimed to construct a radiomics-clinical nomogram to preoperatively differentiate high-grade BCa from low-grade BCa.

Methods

A total of 185 BCa patients who received multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) before surgery between August 2014 and April 2020 were enrolled in our study. Radiomics features were extracted from the largest tumor located on dynamic contrast-enhancement and T2WI images. After feature selection, the synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) was performed to balance the minority group (low-grade group). Radiomics signatures were constructed in the training set and assessed in the validation set. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were applied to build a nomogram.

Results

The radiomics signature generated by the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model achieved the optimal performance for BCa grading in both the SMOTE-balanced training [accuracy: 93.2%, area under the curve (AUC): 0.961] and validation sets (accuracy: 89.9%, AUC: 0.952). A radiomics-clinical nomogram incorporating the radiomics signature and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) score had novel calibration and discrimination both in the training (AUC: 0.956) and validation sets (AUC: 0.958). Decision curve analysis presented the clinical utility of the nomogram for decision-making.

Conclusions

The mpMRI-based radiomics signature had the potential to preoperatively predict the pathological grade of BCa. The proposed nomogram combining the radiomics signature with the VI-RADS score improved the diagnostic power, which may aid in clinical decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time as the data also forms part of an ongoing study.

Code availability

The analytic code is available on request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68 (6):394-424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

  2. Cumberbatch MGK, Jubber I, Black PC, Esperto F, Figueroa JD, Kamat AM, Kiemeney L, Lotan Y, Pang K, Silverman DT, Znaor A, Catto JWF (2018) Epidemiology of Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Contemporary Update of Risk Factors in 2018. Eur Urol 74 (6):784–795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.001

  3. Leo MC, McMullen CK, O'Keeffe-Rosetti M, Weinmann S, Garg T, Nielsen ME (2020) External validation of the EORTC and NCCN bladder cancer recurrence and progression risk calculators in a U.S. community-based health system. Urol Oncol 38 (2):39.e21–39.e27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.003

  4. Babjuk M, Burger M, Compérat EM, Gontero P, Mostafid AH, Palou J, van Rhijn BWG, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Sylvester R, Zigeuner R, Capoun O, Cohen D, Escrig JLD, Hernández V, Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Soukup V (2019) European Association of Urology Guidelines on Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) - 2019 Update. Eur Urol 76 (5):639-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.08.016

  5. Panebianco V, Narumi Y, Altun E, Bochner BH, Efstathiou JA, Hafeez S, Huddart R, Kennish S, Lerner S, Montironi R, Muglia VF, Salomon G, Thomas S, Vargas HA, Witjes JA, Takeuchi M, Barentsz J, Catto JWF (2018) Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Bladder Cancer: Development of VI-RADS (Vesical Imaging-Reporting And Data System). Eur Urol 74 (3):294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.04.029

  6. Shariat SF, Palapattu GS, Karakiewicz PI, Rogers CG, Vazina A, Bastian PJ, Schoenberg MP, Lerner SP, Sagalowsky AI, Lotan Y (2007) Discrepancy between clinical and pathologic stage: impact on prognosis after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol 51 (1):137–149; discussion 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.021

  7. Svatek RS, Shariat SF, Novara G, Skinner EC, Fradet Y, Bastian PJ, Kamat AM, Kassouf W, Karakiewicz PI, Fritsche HM, Izawa JI, Tilki D, Ficarra V, Volkmer BG, Isbarn H, Dinney CP (2011) Discrepancy between clinical and pathological stage: external validation of the impact on prognosis in an international radical cystectomy cohort. BJU Int 107 (6):898–904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09628.x

  8. Turker P, Bostrom PJ, Wroclawski ML, van Rhijn B, Kortekangas H, Kuk C, Mirtti T, Fleshner NE, Jewett MA, Finelli A, Kwast TV, Evans A, Sweet J, Laato M, Zlotta AR (2012) Upstaging of urothelial cancer at the time of radical cystectomy: factors associated with upstaging and its effect on outcome. BJU Int 110 (6):804–811. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10939.x

  9. Mariappan P, Zachou A, Grigor KM (2010) Detrusor muscle in the first, apparently complete transurethral resection of bladder tumour specimen is a surrogate marker of resection quality, predicts risk of early recurrence, and is dependent on operator experience. Eur Urol 57 (5):843–849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.05.047

  10. Marchioni M, Primiceri G, Delli Pizzi A, Basilico R, Berardinelli F, Mincuzzi E, Castellucci R, Sessa B, Di Nicola M, Schips L (2020) Could Bladder Multiparametric MRI Be Introduced in Routine Clinical Practice? Role of the New VI-RADS Score: Results From a Prospective Study. Clinical genitourinary cancer 18 (5):409–415.e401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2020.03.002

  11. Park KJ, Lee JL, Yoon SK, Heo C, Park BW, Kim JK (2020) Radiomics-based prediction model for outcomes of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Eur Radiol 30 (10):5392–5403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06847-0

  12. Xu X, Wang H, Du P, Zhang F, Li S, Zhang Z, Yuan J, Liang Z, Zhang X, Guo Y, Liu Y, Lu H (2019) A predictive nomogram for individualized recurrence stratification of bladder cancer using multiparametric MRI and clinical risk factors. J Magn Reson Imaging 50 (6):1893–1904. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.26749

  13. Wu S, Zheng J, Li Y, Wu Z, Shi S, Huang M, Yu H, Dong W, Huang J, Lin T (2018) Development and Validation of an MRI-Based Radiomics Signature for the Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Bladder Cancer. EBioMedicine 34:76–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.029

  14. Wu S, Zheng J, Li Y, Yu H, Shi S, Xie W, Liu H, Su Y, Huang J, Lin T (2017) A Radiomics Nomogram for the Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Bladder Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23 (22):6904–6911. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1510

  15. Wang H, Hu D, Yao H, Chen M, Li S, Chen H, Luo J, Feng Y, Guo Y (2019) Radiomics analysis of multiparametric MRI for the preoperative evaluation of pathological grade in bladder cancer tumors. Eur Radiol 29 (11):6182–6190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06222-8

  16. Zhang X, Xu X, Tian Q, Li B, Wu Y, Yang Z, Liang Z, Liu Y, Cui G, Lu H (2017) Radiomics assessment of bladder cancer grade using texture features from diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 46 (5):1281–1288. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25669

  17. Chawla N, Bowyer K, Hall L, Kegelmeyer W (2002) SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. J Art Intell Res 6:321–357

  18. Wu Y, Fang Y (2020) Stroke Prediction with Machine Learning Methods among Older Chinese. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17 (6). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17061828

  19. Liu S, Xu F, Xu T, Yan Y, Yao X, Tang G (2020) Evaluation of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) scoring system in predicting muscle invasion of bladder cancer. Translational andrology and urology 9 (2):445–451. https://doi.org/10.21037/tau.2020.02.16

  20. van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, Beets-Tan RGH, Fillion-Robin JC, Pieper S, Aerts H (2017) Computational Radiomics System to Decode the Radiographic Phenotype. Cancer research 77 (21):e104-e107. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-17-0339

  21. Peng H, Long F, Ding C (2005) Feature selection based on mutual information: criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 27 (8):1226–1238. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2005.159

  22. Guyon I, Weston J, Barnhill S, Vapnik V (2002) Gene selection for cancer classification using support sector machines. Machine Learning 46:389–422. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.824819

  23. Hughes G (2015) Youden's index and the weight of evidence. Methods of information in medicine 54 (2):198–199. https://doi.org/10.3414/me14-04-0003

  24. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB, Sr., D'Agostino RB, Jr., Vasan RS (2008) Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Statistics in medicine 27 (2):157–172; discussion 207–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2929

  25. Wang Z, Shang Y, Luan T, Duan Y, Wang J, Wang H, Hao J (2020) Evaluation of the value of the VI-RADS scoring system in assessing muscle infiltration by bladder cancer. Cancer Imaging 20 (1):26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00304-3

  26. Wang HJ, Pui MH, Guo Y, Li SR, Guan J, Zhang XL, Cai HS (2015) Multiparametric 3-T MRI for differentiating low-versus high-grade and category T1 versus T2 bladder urothelial carcinoma. AJR American journal of roentgenology 204 (2):330–334. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.14.13147

  27. Pecoraro M, Takeuchi M, Vargas HA, Muglia VF, Cipollari S, Catalano C, Panebianco V (2020) Overview of VI-RADS in Bladder Cancer. American Journal of Roentgenology 214 (6):1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.20.22763

  28. Del Giudice F, Pecoraro M, Vargas HA, Cipollari S, De Berardinis E, Bicchetti M, Chung BI, Catalano C, Narumi Y, Catto JWF, Panebianco V (2020) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) Inter-Observer Reliability: An Added Value for Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Detection. Cancers 12 (10). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12102994

  29. Daneshmand S, Ahmadi H, Huynh LN, Dobos N (2012) Preoperative staging of invasive bladder cancer with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: results from a prospective study. Urology 80 (6):1313–1318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.056

  30. Wu LM, Chen XX, Xu JR, Zhang XF, Suo ST, Yao QY, Fan Y, Hu J (2013) Clinical value of T2-weighted imaging combined with diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative T staging of urinary bladder cancer: a large-scale, multiobserver prospective study on 3.0-T MRI. Academic radiology 20 (8):939–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2013.02.012

  31. Zhang G, Xu L, Zhao L, Mao L, Li X, Jin Z, Sun H (2020) CT-based radiomics to predict the pathological grade of bladder cancer. Eur Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-06893-8

  32. Li Q, Liu YJ, Dong D, Bai X, Huang QB, Guo AT, Ye HY, Tian J, Wang HY (2020) Multiparametric MRI Radiomic Model for Preoperative Predicting WHO/ISUP Nuclear Grade of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27182

  33. Liu M, Mao N, Ma H, Dong J, Zhang K, Che K, Duan S, Zhang X, Shi Y, Xie H (2020) Pharmacokinetic parameters and radiomics model based on dynamic contrast enhanced MRI for the preoperative prediction of sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Cancer Imaging 20 (1):65. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40644-020-00342-x

  34. Li ZY, Wang XD, Li M, Liu XJ, Ye Z, Song B, Yuan F, Yuan Y, Xia CC, Zhang X, Li Q (2020) Multi-modal radiomics model to predict treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. World journal of gastroenterology 26 (19):2388–2402. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v26.i19.2388

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Outstanding Talent of Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital (20215YPDRC048), the Natural Science Foundation of China (81472389), the Shanghai Science Committee Foundation (19411967700), and the Shanghai Youth Science and Technology Talents Sailing Program (20YF1437200).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.Y, S.L and Z.Z contributed to the study design. Z.Z, S.L, F.X and Z.G contributed to data collection. Z.Z, F.X, Y.Y and T.X performed the statistical analyses. Z.Z and F.X wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shenghua Liu or Xudong Yao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and approved the content and agree to submit for consideration for publication in the journal.

Ethical approval

The study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital (approval number SHSY-IEC-4.1/19–120/01) and conducted in accordance with the ethical standards.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was waived due to its retrospective nature.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 701 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Z., Xu, F., Gu, Z. et al. Integrating multiparametric MRI radiomics features and the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for bladder cancer grading. Abdom Radiol 46, 4311–4323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03108-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-03108-6

Keywords

Navigation