Skip to main content
Log in

Intra- inter-observer repeatability in liver computed tomography volumetry in patients undergoing radioembolization simulation

  • Interventional Radiology
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The careful evaluation of MDCT is an essential step for the treatment planning in pre-treatment imaging work-up for Trans-Arterial Radio Embolization (TARE). It may provide unique volumetric data (CTVs), which are information useful for an effective and safe TARE. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the radiographer is able to calculate CTVs of TARE simulation with the same precision as the interventional radiologist.

Methods

This study retrospectively considers 17 consecutive patients (8 males, 9 females; mean age 66.3 ± 13.2 years) who underwent pre-treatment work-up for TARE, between May 2019 and February 2020 (trial ID:2234 - protocol). For each patient, four specific parameters are evaluated from MDCT achieved during treatment simulation: healthy liver volume (HLV), the whole hepatic parenchyma (THV = healthy liver and TTV = tumour) involved by TARE, and whole liver volume (WLV). Four independent observers—R1 (expert interventional radiologist), T1, T2, and T3 (radiographers, with different experiences in the field of interventional radiology)—are involved in the imaging analysed.

Results

All the 4 observers detected the same number of hepatic lesion(s) per patient. Regarding the three radiographers, the intra-observer reliability for CTVs is very high 0.997 to 1.000 (95%CI). Also inter-observer reproducibility between radiographers is excellent regarding CTVs, 0.965 to 0.999 (95%CI). The accuracy of radiographer evaluation is very high 0.964 to 0.999 (95%CI).

Conclusions and implications for practice

The high intra- and inter-observer reproducibility shows that a properly trained radiographers might have the same accuracy as interventional radiologists, in assessing liver CTV data for planning TARE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S.P. Kim, C. Cohalan, N. Kopek, S.A. Enger, A guide to 90Y radioembolization and its dosimetry, Phys. Medica. 68 (2019) 132–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.236.

  2. Y. Ha, J.H. Shim, G.W. Song, S.O. Kim, T.Y. Ha, D.H. Jung, K.M. Kim, Y.S. Lim, H.C. Lee, S.G. Lee, Role of computed tomography volumetry in estimating liver weights in surgical patients with hepatic steatosis, Exp. Clin. Transplant. 15 (2017). https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2016.0065.

  3. E.J. Lee, H.W. Chung, J.H. Jo, Y. So, Radioembolization for the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Liver Cancers, Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging (2010). 53 (2019) 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-019-00615-9.

  4. M.C. Lim, C.H. Tan, J. Cai, J. Zheng, A.W.C. Kow, CT volumetry of the liver: Where does it stand in clinical practice?, Clin. Radiol. 69 (2014) 887–895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.12.021.

  5. N. Mussin, M. Sumo, K.W. Lee, Y.R. Choi, J.Y. Choi, S.W. Ahn, K.C. Yoon, H.S. Kim, S.K. Hong, N.J. Yi, K.S. Suh, The correlation between preoperative volumetry and real graft weight: Comparison of two volumetry programs, Ann. Surg. Treat. Res. 92 (2017) 214–220. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.4.214.

  6. R. Salem, K.G. Thurston, Radioembolization with 90yttrium microspheres: A state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies: Part 2: Special topics, J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. (2006). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.RVI.0000235779.88652.53.

  7. S. Ho, W.Y. Lau, T.W.T. Leung, M. Chan, Y.K. Ngar, P.J. Johnson, A.K.C. Li, Partition model for estimating radiation doses from yttrium-90 microspheres in treating hepatic tumours, Eur. J. Nucl. Med. (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01084369.

  8. S.A. Gulec, G. Mesoloras, M. Stabin, Dosimetric techniques in 90Y-microsphere therapy of liver cancer: The MIRD equations for dose calculations, J. Nucl. Med. 47 (2006) 1209–1211.

  9. J.R. Van Der Vorst, R.M. Van Dam, R.S.A. Van Stiphout, M.A. Van Den Broek, I.H. Hollander, A.G.H. Kessels, C.H.C. Dejong, Virtual Liver Resection and Volumetric Analysis of the Future Liver Remnant using Open Source Image Processing Software, World J. Surg. 34 (2010) 2426–2433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0663-5.

  10. T.M. Lodewick, C.W.K.P. Arnoldussen, M.J. Lahaye, K.M.C. van Mierlo, U.P. Neumann, R.G. Beets-Tan, C.H.C. Dejong, R.M. van Dam, Fast and accurate liver volumetry prior to hepatectomy, Hpb. 18 (2016) 764–772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2016.06.009.

  11. Y. Lu, Z. Wu, C. Liu, H.H. Wang, Hepatic volumetry with PhotoShop in personal computer, Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Dis. Int. (2004).

  12. S.A.W.G. Dello, R.M. Van Dam, J.J.G. Slangen, M.C.G. Van De Poll, M.H.A. Bemelmans, J.W.W.M. Greve, R.G.H. Beets-Tan, S.J. Wigmore, C.H.C. Dejong, Liver volumetry plug and play: Do it yourself with ImageJ, World J. Surg. 31 (2007) 2215–2221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9197-x.

  13. A. Radtke, G.C. Sotiropoulos, S. Nadalin, E.P. Molmenti, T. Schroeder, H. Lang, F. Saner, C. Valentin-Gamazo, A. Frilling, A. Schenk, C.E. Broelsch, M. Malagó, Preoperative volume prediction in adult living donor liver transplantation: How much can we rely on it? Essen experience based on virtual three-dimensional computed tomography-volume assessment, Am. J. Transplant. 7 (2007) 672–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01656.x.

  14. A. Gotra, G. Chartrand, K. Massicotte-Tisluck, F. Morin-Roy, F. Vandenbroucke-Menu, J.A. de Guise, A. Tang, Validation of a Semiautomated Liver Segmentation Method Using CT for Accurate Volumetry, Acad. Radiol. 22 (2015) 1088–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.03.010.

  15. K.O. McGraw, S.P. Wong, “Forming inferences about some intraclass coMcGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996). “Forming inferences about some intraclass correlations coefficients”: Correction. Psychological Methods, 1(4), 390–390. http://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.390rrelations coe, Psychol. Methods. (1996). https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.1.4.390.

  16. G. Mauri, G.M. Varano, P. Della Vigna, G. Bonomo, L. Monfardini, M.G. Zampino, P.S. Ravenda, F. Orsi, Transarterial Embolization with Small-Size Particles Loaded with Irinotecan for the Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Results of the MIRACLE III Study, Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 41 (2018) 1708–1715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-2017-x.

Download references

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Ricerca Corrente and 5x1000 founds and by Fondazione IEO-CCM.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: AM, FO, VB, Methodology: AM, VC, LB, GB, Formal analysis and investigation: CIF, RL, VB, EP, Writing—original draft preparation: AM, LB, Writing—review and editing: AM, LB, FO, Supervision: CIF, RL, FO

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Masperi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Masperi, A., Cubadda, V., Bombelli, L. et al. Intra- inter-observer repeatability in liver computed tomography volumetry in patients undergoing radioembolization simulation. Abdom Radiol 46, 3448–3455 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-02980-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-02980-6

Keywords

Navigation