Abstract
This is a pictorial review on the radiological approach to patients with amenorrhea using a level-based framework. The prevalence of amenorrhea is 3 to 4% with wide-ranging causes involving multiple clinical disciplines. Normal menstruation depends on complex coordinated hormonal functions of the hypothalamic–pituitary–ovarian axis exerting its effect on an intact uterine end-organ and outflow tract. A disruption of any of these factors may result in amenorrhea. Categorizing the causes of primary and secondary amenorrhea into uterine, ovarian/gonadal, and intracranial levels provides a logical framework for its evaluation. A systematic level-based approach by targeted ultrasound of the pelvic structures is suggested, with different aims in primary versus secondary amenorrhea. Pelvic sonographic findings of various conditions within the uterine and ovarian/gonadal levels are illustrated. Conditions due to an intracranial cause result in downstream effects on the uterus and ovaries and can often be suspected based on a combination of clinical assessment, ultrasound findings, and laboratory investigations. By correlating pelvic ultrasound findings with underlying pathology, the clinical radiologist is able to provide useful diagnostic information in the management of these patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
The practice committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2006) Current evaluation of amenorrhea. Fertil Steril 86 (5 Suppl 1):S148-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.013
Speroff L, Fritz MA (2005) Amenorrhea. In: Speroff L, Fritz MA (ed) Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility, 7th edn. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, pp 401-464
Garel L, Dubois J, Grignon A, Filiatrault D, Van Vliet G (2001) US of the pediatric female pelvis: a clinical perspective. Radiographics 21(6):1393-407. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.6.g01nv041393
Siegel MJ (1991) Pediatric gynecologic sonography. Radiology 179(3):593-600. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.3.2027956
Langer JE, Oliver ER, Lev-Toaff AS, Coleman BG (2012) Imaging of the female pelvis through the life cycle. Radiographics 32(6):1575-97. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125513
The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal obstruction, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions (1988) Fertil Steril 49(6):944–955. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59942-7
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 728 (2018) Müllerian Agenesis: Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment. Obstet Gynecol 131(1):e35-e42. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002458
Ahmed SF, Cheng A, Dovey L, Hawkins JR, Marin H, Rowland J, Shimura N, Tait AD, Hughes IA (2000) Phenotypic features, androgen receptor binding, and mutational analysis in 278 clinical cases reported as androgen insensitivity syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(2):658–65. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.2.6337
Blask AR, Sanders RC, Rock JA (1991) Obstructed uterovaginal anomalies: demonostration with sonography. Part II. Teenagers. Radiology 179(1):84-88. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.179.1.2006308
Management of acute obstructive uterovaginal anomalies: ACOG committee opinion (2019) Obstetrics and Gynecology 133(6): e363-e371. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003281
Troiano RM, McCarthy SM (2004) Müllerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 233(1):19-34. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2331020777
Reinhold C, Hricak H, Forstner R, Ascher SM, Bret PM, Meyer WR, Semelka RC (1997) Primary amenorrhea: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology 203(2):383-90. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.203.2.9114092
Viner RM, Teoh Y, Williams DM, Patterson MN, Hughes IA (1997) Androgen insensitivity syndrome: a survey of diagnostic procedures and management in the UK. Arch Dis Child 77(4):305-309. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.77.4.305
Master-Hunter T, Heiman DL (2006) Amenorrhea: evaluation and treatment. Am Fam Physician 73(8):1374-82
Kesler SR (2007) Turner syndrome. Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am 16(3):709-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2007.02.004
Mazzanti L, Cacciari E, Bergamaschi R, Tassinari D, Magnani C, Perri A, Scarano E, Pluchinotta V (1997) Pelvic sonography in patients with Turner syndrome: age-related findings in different karyotypes. J Pediatr 131(1 Pt 1):135-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70137-9
Zieliñska D, Zajączek S, Rzepka-Górska I (2007) Tumors of dysgenetic gonads in Swyer syndrome. J Pediatr Surg 42(10):1721-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.05.029
Ebert KM, Hewitt GD, Indyk JA, McCracken KA, Nahata L, Jayanthi VR (2018) Normal pelvic ultrasound or MRI does not rule out neoplasm in patients with gonadal dysgenesis and Y chromosome material. J Pediatr Urol; 14(2): 154 e1–154 e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.11.009
Emans SJ (1998) Delayed puberty and menstrual irregularities. In: Emans SJ, Lauffer MR, Goldstein DP (ed) Pediatric and adolescent gynecology, 4th edn. Philadelphia, USA: Lippincott-Raven, pp 163-262
Wallace WH, Shalet SM, Crowne EC, Morris-Jones PH, Gattamaneni HR (1989) Ovarian failure following abdominal irradiation in childhood: natural history and prognosis. Clin Oncol 1(2):75-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0936-6555(89)80039-1
Pletcher JR, Slap GB (1999) Menstrual disorders. Amenorrhea. Pediatr Clin North Am 46(3):505-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70134-6
Hoek A, Schoemaker J, Drexhage HA (1997) Premature ovarian failure and ovarian autoimmunity. Endocr Rev 18(1):107-34. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv.18.1.0291
E Merz E, Miric-Tesanic D, Bahlmann F, Weber G, Wellek (1996) Sonographic size of uterus and ovaries in pre- and post-menopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 7(1):38-42. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.07010038.x
Roach MK, Andreotti RF (2017) The normal female pelvis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 60(1):3-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000259
Pavlik EJ, DePriest PD, Gallion HH, Ueland FR, Reedy MB, Kryscio RJ, van Nagell Jr JR (2000) Ovarian volume related to age. Gynecol Oncol 77(3):410-2. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.2000.5783
Yu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC (2008) Asherman syndrome – one century later. Fertil Steril 89(4):759-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096
Lo ST, Ramsay P, Pierson R, Manconi F, Munro MG, Fraser IS (2008) Endometrial thickness measured by ultrasound scan in women with uterine outlet obstruction due to intrauterine or upper cervical adhesions. Hum Reprod 23(2):306-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dem393
Shalev J, Meizner I, Bar-Hava I, Dicker D, Mashiach R, Ben-Rafael Z (2000) Predictive value of transvaginal sonography performed before routine hysteroscopy for evaluation of infertility. Fertil Steril 73(2):412-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00533-6
Anasti JN (1998) Premature ovarian failure: an update. Fertil Steril 70(1):1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00099-5
Conway GS, Kaltsas G, Patel A, Davies MC, Jacobs HS (1996) Characterization of idiopathic premature ovarian failure. Fertil Steril 65(2):337-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58095-9
Mehta AE, Matwijiw I, Lyons EA, Faiman C (1992) Noninvasive diagnosis of resistant ovary syndrome by ultrasonography. Fertil Steril 57(1):56-61
Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D et al (2009) The androgen excess and PCOS society criteria for polycystic ovarian syndrome: the complete task force report. Fertil Steril 91(2):456-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.035
Lee TT, Arusch ME (2012) Polycystic ovarian syndrome: role of imaging in diagnosis. Radiographics 32(6):1643-57. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.326125503
Teede HJ, Misso ML, Costello MF, Dokras A, Laven J, Mora L, Piltonen T, Norman RJ, International PCOS Network (2018) Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 110(3):364-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004
Meek CL, Bravis V, Don A, Kaplan F (2013) Polycystic ovarian syndrome and the differential diagnosis of hyperandrogenism. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 15:171-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12030
Horta M, Cunha TM (2015) Sex cord-stromal tumors of the ovary: a comprehensive review and update for radiologists. Diagn Interv Radiol 21(4):277-286. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2015.34414
Outwater EK, Marchetto B, Wagner BJ (2000) Virilizing tumors of the ovary: imaging features. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15(5):365-71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00123.x
Boehm U, Bouloux PM, Dattani MT et al (2015) Expert consensus document: European Consensus Statement on congenital hypogonadotropic hypogonadism—pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment Nat Rev Endcocrinol 11(9):547–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.112
Shoupe D, Mishell DR Jr. (1997) Hyperprolactinemia: diagnosis and treatment. In: Lobo RA, Mishell DR Jr, Paulson RJ, Shoupe D (ed) Infertility, contraception and reproductive endocrinology, 4th edn. Massachusetts, USA. Blackwell Science, pp 323-41
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teo, S.Y., Ong, C.L. A systematic approach to imaging the pelvis in amenorrhea. Abdom Radiol 46, 3326–3341 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-02961-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-021-02961-9