Skip to main content
Log in

Representation of women among leadership and honorees within the Society of Abdominal Radiology, past and present

  • Practice
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate gender diversity over time within the leadership and honorees of the Society of Abdominal Radiology with comparison to other radiologic societies.

Methods

This was a retrospective, observational study of the gender distribution of presidents and gold meal awardees within the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) compared to three national radiology organizations: the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS), and the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA). Data were collected from the inception of each society through 2020. Societies were directly contacted for president and Gold Medal awardee names when this information was not available on society websites. Differences in the proportion of female presidents and Gold Medal awardees before and after 2012, by society, were performed using χ2 test; 2012 was selected as a threshold year as this represented when SAR was created. Results: The proportion of female past presidents was 5%, 9%, and 33% for the SGR, SUR, and SAR, respectively, and 5%, 4%, and 7% for the ACR, ARRS, and RSNA, respectively. The proportion of female Gold Medal awardees was 5%, 4%, and 10% for the SGR, SUR, and SAR, respectively, and 5%, 7%, and 7%, respectively, for ACR, ARRS, and RSNA. There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of women presidents and honorees in all societies after 2012 compared to before 2012, but no significant difference between societies in either time period.

Conclusion

A higher proportion of female presidents and honorees were demonstrated across all societies after 2012.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen JJ, Gabriel BA, Terrell C. The case for diversity in the health care workforce. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21:90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallis CJ, Ravi B, Coburn N, Nam RK, Detsky AS, Satkunasivam R. Comparison of postoperative outcomes among patients treated by male and female surgeons: a population based matched cohort study. BMJ. 2017; 359.

  3. Tsugawa, Y et al. Comparison of Hospital Mortality and Readmission Rates for Medicare Patients Treated by Male vs Female Physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(2):206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marrast, L.M., Zallman, L., Woolhandler, S., Bor, D.H., McCormick, D. Minority physicians’ role in the care of underserved patients: diversifying the physician workforce may be key in addressing health disparities. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kruskal JB, Patel AK, Levine D, Cannon CL, Macura KJ, Allen BJ, Meltzer C. Fostering Diversity and Inclusion: A Summary of the 2017 Intersociety Summer Conference. JACR. 2018;15(5): 794.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lightfoote, Johnson B. et al. Diversity, Inclusion, and Representation: It Is Time to Act. Journal of the American College of Radiology, Volume 13, Issue 12, 1421 – 1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wallner, Paul E. et al. Gender Diversity Within the American Board of Radiology: History, Current Status, and Future Implications. Journal of the American College of Radiology, Volume 16, Issue 12, 1713 – 1715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bender, Claire E. et al. 2019 ACR Commission on Human Resources Workforce Survey. Journal of the American College of Radiology, Volume 17, Issue 5, 673 – 675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Grimm LJ, Ngo J, Pisano ED, Yoon S. Men (and Women) in Academic Radiology: How Can We Reduce the Gender Discrepancy? American Journal of Roentgenology 2016 206:4, 678-680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapoor N, Blumenthal DM, Smith SE, Ip IK, Khorasani R. Gender Differences in Academic Rank of Radiologists in U.S. Medical Schools. Radiology. 2017; 283(1):140‐147. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2016160950.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosenkrantz AB, Wang W, Hughes DR, Duszak R Jr. Generalist versus Subspecialist Characteristics of the U.S. Radiologist Workforce. Radiology. 2018; 286(3):929‐937. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017171684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Glastonbury CM, Wall SD, Arenson RL. Gender Issues Persist in Academic Radiology Promotions. Radiology. 2017;283(1):4‐6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162508.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lautenberger DM, Dandar VM. The State of Women in Academic Medicine 2018–2019. American Association of Medical Colleges 2020.

  14. Spalluto, Lucy B. et al. A Female Faculty Development Program for Radiology. Journal of the American College of Radiology, Volume 13, Issue 6, 716 – 718.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sepulveda KA, Paladin AM, Rawson JV. Gender Diversity in Academic Radiology Departments: Barriers and Best Practices to Optimizing Inclusion and Developing Women Leaders. Radiology, Vol 25, No 5, May 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Society of Abdominal Radiology. Retrieved May 22, 2020. https://www.abdominalradiology.org/

  17. Radiologic Society of North America- Past Leadership. Retrieved June 16, 2020. https://www.rsna.org/en/about/past-leadership

  18. American College of Radiology. https://www.acr.org/Member-Resources/Fellowship-Honors/Gold-Medal. Retrieved June 16, 2020.

  19. American Roentgen Ray Society. https://www.arrs.org/ARRSLIVE/AboutARRS/GoldMedalists/ARRSLIVE/AboutARRS/GoldMedals.aspx?hkey=435efaa1-bf7e-4e58-9a32-5ac5a11eb020. Retrieved June 16, 2020.

  20. Radiologic Society of North America. Retrieved June 16, 2020. https://www.rsna.org/en/about/distinguished-award-recipients/gold-medalists

  21. Rosenkrantz AB, Hughes, DR, Duszak Jr., R. Increasing Subspecialization of the National Radiologist Workforce. Journal of the American College of Radiology, June 2020; Volume 17, Issue 6, 812-817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge Lauren Attridge from the American College of Radiology (ACR) and Laura Mishler from the American Roentgen Ray Society (ARRS) for their assistance in providing the names of the past presidents of their respective societies for this manuscript. The authors would also like to acknowledge Natarajan Raghunand, Natarajan, PhD, for his assistance with statistical analysis

Funding

There was no funding support for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by KT, PP, HZ, and ES. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KT and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kerry L. Thomas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Kerry Thomas: No relevant conflict of interest related to this manuscript; holds stock equity in Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Novartis, United Health Group, Thermo Fisher, and Danahaer Cheri Canon; and serves on SAR Board.

Ethical approval

This is an observational study. The Institution Scientific Review Committee confirmed that no ethical approval is required.

Consent to participate

Not applicable for this observational study.

Consent to publish

Not applicable for this observational study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thomas, K.L., Zafar, H., Parikh, P. et al. Representation of women among leadership and honorees within the Society of Abdominal Radiology, past and present. Abdom Radiol 46, 5758–5762 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02922-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02922-8

Keywords

Navigation