Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation of tumor response on CT with pathologically proven necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma treated by conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: threshold value of intratumoral Lipiodol accumulation predicting tumor necrosis

  • Interventional Radiology
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate associations between pathology and CT assessments made according to the mRECIST in HCC treated by conventional TACE (cTACE), and to identify predictors of complete tumor necrosis.

Methods

From March 2016 to July 2018, 83 patients with a total of 100 masses were retrospectively included. Patients underwent sequential cTACE and portal vein embolization, and later hepatic surgery. Evaluation of treatment response and measurement of baseline lipiodol accumulation as mean HU was performed on CT at the time point closest to the time of operation (mean, 54.5 days after cTACE). Significant predictors associated with complete necrosis were identified by multivariate analysis. The optimal cut-off HU value of lipiodol accumulation for prediction of complete necrosis was determined using a ROC analysis.

Results

According to mRECIST, complete response (CR, n = 70) and partial response (n = 30) were classified. 34.3% (24/70) masses classified as CR according to mRECIST were found to have viable lesions on pathology. On multivariate analysis, mean HU of lipiodol accumulation was the only significant predictor of complete necrosis (p = .003, odds ratio 1.746, 95% CI 1.201–2.539). On ROC analysis, 460 HU as a cut-off value was significantly associated with complete necrosis (67.4% sensitivity, 75.0% specificity).

Conclusions

A threshold value for lipiodol accumulation > 460 HU was highly sensitive and specific for complete necrosis, even in complete response according to mRECIST. Therefore, if lipiodol accumulation is insufficient in post-TACE CT, recurrence should be monitored more sensitively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Due to ethical restrictions, the raw data underlying this paper are available upon request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

PVE:

Portal vein embolization

AVP:

Amplatzer vascular plug

NBCA:

n-Butyl cyanoacrylate

CR:

Complete response

PR:

Partial response

FLR:

Future liver remnant

BCLC:

Barcelona clinic liver cancer

AFP:

Serum alpha-fetoprotein

PIVKA-II:

Protein induced by vitamin K absence-II

LC:

Liver cirrhosis

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

HCV:

Hepatitis C virus

NBNC:

Non-B, non-C liver cirrhosis

PVT:

Portal vein thrombus

SD:

Standard deviation

IQR:

Interquartile range

FU:

Follow up

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Takayasu K (2013) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progression and perspective. Oncology 84(Suppl 1):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000345886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lencioni R, Petruzzi P, Crocetti L (2013) Chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Intervent Radiol 30:3–11. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1333648

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lo CM, Ngan H, Tso WK, et al. (2002) Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35:1164–1171. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2002.33156

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Haywood N, Gennaro K, Obert J, et al. (2016) Does the Degree of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumor Necrosis following Transarterial Chemoembolization Impact Patient Survival? J Oncol 2016:4692139. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4692139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Takayasu K, Arii S, Matsuo N, et al. (2000) Comparison of CT findings with resected specimens after chemoembolization with iodized oil for hepatocellular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:699–704. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Forner A, Llovet JM, Bruix J (2012) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 379:1245–1255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61347-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lencioni R (2010) Loco-regional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 52:762–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.23725

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Forner A, Ayuso C, Varela M, et al. (2009) Evaluation of tumor response after locoregional therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: are response evaluation criteria in solid tumors reliable? Cancer 115:616–623. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yaghmai V, Besa C, Kim E, et al. (2013) Imaging assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma response to locoregional and systemic therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 201:80–96. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.10706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Murakami T, Nakamura H, Hori S, et al. (1993) Detection of viable tumor cells in hepatocellular carcinoma following transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with iodized oil: pathologic correlation with dynamic turbo-FLASH MR imaging with Gd-DTPA. Acta Radiol 34:399–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sato Y, Watanabe H, Sone M, et al. (2013) Tumor response evaluation criteria for HCC (hepatocellular carcinoma) treated using TACE (transcatheter arterial chemoembolization): RECIST (response evaluation criteria in solid tumors) version 1.1 and mRECIST (modified RECIST): JIVROSG-0602. Ups J Med Sci 118:16–22. https://doi.org/10.3109/03009734.2012.729104

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bargellini I, Bozzi E, Campani D, et al. (2013) Modified RECIST to assess tumor response after transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: CT-pathologic correlation in 178 liver explants. Eur J Radiol 82:e212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dioguardi Burgio M, Ronot M, Bruno O, et al. (2016) Correlation of tumor response on computed tomography with pathological necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma treated by chemoembolization before liver transplantation. Liver Transpl 22:1491–1500. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.24615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Imaeda T, Yamawaki Y, Seki M, et al. (1993) Lipiodol retention and massive necrosis after lipiodol-chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between computed tomography and histopathology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 16:209–213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kwan SW, Fidelman N, Ma E, Kerlan RK Jr, Yao FY (2012) Imaging predictors of the response to transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a radiological-pathological correlation. Liver Transpl 18:727–736. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.23413

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Choi BI, Kim HC, Han JK, et al. (1992) Therapeutic effect of transcatheter oily chemoembolization therapy for encapsulated nodular hepatocellular carcinoma: CT and pathologic findings. Radiology 182:709–713. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.182.3.1311116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsui Y, Horikawa M, Jahangiri Y, et al. (2016) Degree of baseline lipiodol accumulation after transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: identification of a threshold value predicting tumor response [abstract 183]. J Vasc Interv Radiol 27(3 suppl):S85–S86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2015.12.227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choi JH, Hwang S, Lee YJ, Kim KH, Ko GY, Gwon DI, et al. (2015) Prognostic effect of preoperative sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for right hepatectomy in patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 19:59-65. https://doi.org/10.14701/kjhbps.2015.19.2.59

  20. Ogata S, Belghiti J, Farges O, et al. (2006) Sequential arterial and portal vein embolizations before right hepatectomy in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Br J Surg 93:1091–1098. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5341

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ko GY, Sung KB, Yoon HK, et al. (2003) Preoperative portal vein embolization with a new liquid embolic agent. Radiology 227:407–413. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2272011702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yoo H, Ko GY, Gwon DI, et al. (2009) Preoperative portal vein embolization using an amplatzer vascular plug. Eur Radiol 19:1054–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1240-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim SH, Lee WJ, Lim HK, Lim JH (2007) Prediction of viable tumor in hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: usefulness of attenuation value measurement at quadruple-phase helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rct.0000236424.20514.2e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kubota K, Hisa N, Nishikawa T, et al. (2001) Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: comparison of Lipiodol-CT, power Doppler sonography, and dynamic MRI. Abdom Imaging 26:184–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. El Bacha H, Salihoun M, Kabbaj N, Benkabbou A (2017) Complete necrosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after preoperative portal vein embolization: a case report. J Med Case Rep 11:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-016-1160-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. de Graaf W, van den Esschert JW, van Lienden KP, van Gulik TM (2009) Induction of tumor growth after preoperative portal vein embolization: is it a real problem? Ann Surg Oncol 16:423–430. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-008-0222-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There were no funding sources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dong Il Gwon.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, C., Gwon, D.I., Chu, H.H. et al. Correlation of tumor response on CT with pathologically proven necrosis in hepatocellular carcinoma treated by conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization: threshold value of intratumoral Lipiodol accumulation predicting tumor necrosis. Abdom Radiol 46, 3729–3737 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02845-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02845-4

Keywords

Navigation