Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Prediction of bowel obstruction caused by obturator hernia using risk factor categories on clinical characteristics and multidetector computed tomographic findings

  • Special Section: The pelvic floor
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To detect risk factors on clinical characteristics and multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) findings for predicting bowel obstruction in patients with obturator hernia.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients who had an obturator hernia diagnosed by MDCT and/or surgery. The patients were divided into obstruction and non-obstruction group based on the presence or absence of bowel obstruction on MDCT images. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for predicting bowel obstruction.

Results

There were 26 patients (55.32%) in the obstruction group and 21 patients (44.68%) in the non-obstruction group. Patients in the obstruction group were older (P = 0.002) and had more women (P = 0.033) and lower body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.0001) than patients in the non-obstruction group. The non-obstruction group suffered fewer bowel obstruction symptoms (P = 0.0001), Howship-Romberg (HR) sign (P = 0.012), deaths (P = 0.008) and major postoperative complications (P = 0.047). The hernia sac in the obstruction group had greater mean major diameter (P = 0.0001) and volume (P = 0.001) than those in the non-obstruction group. Multivariate analysis showed that age [odds ratio (OR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00–1.39, P = 0.046] and major diameter of hernia sac (OR 68.17, 95% CI 4.52–1027.70, P = 0.002) were independent risk factors associated with bowel obstruction in patients with obturator hernia.

Conclusions

Patient’s age and major diameter of hernia sac are independent risk factors resulting in bowel obstruction in patients with obturator hernia. Obturator hernia repair before bowel obstruction development may result in better outcomes and fewer postoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

MDCT:

Multidetector computed tomography

CT:

Computed tomography

BMI:

Body mass index

HR:

Howship–Romberg

PPMVG:

Pneumatosis and/or portomesenteric venous gas

OR:

Odds ratio

CI:

Confidence interval

PFDs:

Pelvic floor disorders

References

  1. Ziegler DW, Rhoads Jr JE. Obturator hernia needs a laparotomy, not a diagnosis. Am J Surg 1995;170:67–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lo CY, Lorentz TG, Lau PW. Obturator hernia presenting as small bowel obstruction. Am J Surg 1994;167:396–398.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Burt BM, Cevasco M, Smink DS. Clinical images. Classic presentation of a type II obturator hernia. Am J Surg 2010;199:e75–76.

  4. Chang SS, Shan YS, Lin YJ, Tai YS, Lin PW. A review of obturator hernia and a proposed algorithm for its diagnosis and treatment. World J Surg 2005;29:450–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yokoyama Y, Yamaguchi A, Isogai M, Hori A, Kaneoka Y. Thirty-six cases of obturator hernia: does computed tomography contribute to postoperative outcome? World J Surg 1999;23:214–217.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cubillo E. Obturator hernia diagnosed by computed tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;140:735–736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva AC, Pimenta M, Guimarães LS. Small bowel obstruction: what to look for. Radiographics 2009;29:423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Suri S, Gupta S, Sudhakar PJ, Venkataramu NK, Sood B, Wig JD. Comparative evaluation of plain films, ultrasound and CT in the diagnosis of intestinal obstruction. Acta Radiol 1999;40:422–428.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mantoo SK, Mak K, Tan TJ. Obturator hernia: diagnosis and treatment in the modern era. Singapore Med J 2009;50:866–870.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray SW, Skandalakis JE, Soria RE, Rowe Jr JS. Strangulated obturator hernia. Surgery 1974;75:20–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Losanoff JE, Richman BW, Jones JW. Obturator hernia. J Am Coll Surg 2002;194:657–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Skandalakis PN, Zoras O, Skandalakis JE, Mirilas P. Richter hernia: surgical anatomy and technique of repair. Am Surg 2006;72:180–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Light D, Razi K, Horgan L. Computed tomography in the investigation and management of obturator hernia. Scott Med J 2016;61:103–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. De Clercq L, Coenegrachts K, Feryn T, et al. An elderly woman with obstructed obturator hernia: a less common variety of external abdominal hernia. JBR-BTR 2010;93:302–304.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hodgins N, Cieplucha K, Conneally P, Ghareeb E. Obturator hernia: a case peport and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2013;4:889–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gianetta E, de Cian F, Cuneo S, et al. Hernia repair in elderly patients. Br J Surg 1997;84:983–985.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Steinke W, Zellweger R. Richter’s hernia and Sir Frederick Treves: an original clinical experience, review, and historical overview. Ann Surg 2000;232:710–718.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kammori M, Mafune K, Hirashima T, et al. Forty-three cases of obturator hernia. Am J Surg 2004;187:549–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petrie A, Tubbs RS, Matusz P, Shaffer K, Loukas M. Obturator hernia: anatomy, embryology, diagnosis, and treatment. Clin Anat 2011;24:562–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Grigoriadis T, Athanasiou S. Investigation of pelvic floor disorders. Climacteric 2019;22:223–228.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Arouca MAF, Duarte TB, Lott DAM, et al. Validation and cultural translation for Brazilian Portuguese version of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7) and Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory (PFDI-20). Int Urogynecol J 2019;27:1097–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Good MM, Solomon ER. Pelvic floor disorders. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2019;46:527–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Liu J, Tan SQ, Han HC. Knowledge of pelvic floor disorder in pregnancy. Int Urogynecol J 2019;30:991–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jelovsek JE, Chagin K, Gyhagen M, et al. Predicting risk of pelvic floor disorders 12 and 20 years after delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:222.e1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Altom LK, Snyder CW, Gray SH, Graham LA, Vick CC, Hawn MT. Outcomes of emergent incisional hernia repair. Am Surg 2011;77:971–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank pathology staff Hua-liang Xiao, computed tomography technician Qi-sheng Ran and Guang-kuo Guo for their help.

Funding

This study was supported by Grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81671943).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the ethics board of our institution and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived because of the retrospective design.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Zhang, Cl., Kuang, Lq. et al. Prediction of bowel obstruction caused by obturator hernia using risk factor categories on clinical characteristics and multidetector computed tomographic findings. Abdom Radiol 46, 4069–4078 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02838-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02838-3

Keywords

Navigation