Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT texture analysis for the differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes

  • Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this study was to investigate whether computed tomography texture analysis can be used to differentiate papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) subtypes.

Method

Sixty-two PRCC tumors were retrospectively evaluated, with 30 type 1 tumors and 32 type 2 tumors. Texture parameters quantified from three-phase contrast-enhanced CT images were compared with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed, and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated for each parameter. The selected texture parameters of each phase were used to generate support vector machine (SVM) classifiers. Decision curve analysis (DCA) of the classification was performed.

Results

The two texture parameters with the top two AUC values were – 333–7 Correlation (AUC = 0.772) and 45–7 Entropy (AUC = 0.753) in the corticomedullary phase, 333–4 Correlation (AUC = 0.832) and 45–7 Entropy (AUC = 0.841) in the nephrographic phase, and 135–7 Entropy (AUC = 0.858) and – 333–1 InformationMeasureCorr2 (AUC = 0.849) in the excretory phase. Entropy and Correlation have a high correlation with the two types of PRCC and are increased in type 2 PRCC. A model incorporating the texture parameters with the top two AUC values in each phase produced an AUC of 0.922 with an accuracy of 84% (sensitivity = 89% and specificity = 80%). The nephrographic-phase model and the model combining the texture parameters of the three phases can differentiate the two types with the largest net benefit.

Conclusions

Computed tomography texture analysis can be used to distinguish type 2 PRCC from type 1 with high accuracy, which may be clinically important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under curve

CT:

Computed tomography

DCA:

Decision curve analysis

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

LASSO:

Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PRCC:

Papillary renal cell carcinoma

RCC:

Renal cell carcinoma

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

ROI:

Region of interest

SVM:

Support vector machine

TA:

Texture analysis

References

  1. Moch H, Cubilla AL, Humphrey PA, Reuter VE, Ulbright TM (2016) The 2016 WHO classification of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs-part a: renal, penile, and testicular tumours. Eur Urol 70:93–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Sasaguri, N. Takahashi, CT and MR imaging for solid renal mass characterization, Eur. J. Radiol. 99 (2018) 40–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Doshi AM, Ream JM, Kierans AS, et al. Use of MRI in differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes: qualitative and quantitative analysis. AJR 2016; 206:566–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Egbert ND, Caoili EM, Cohan RH, et al. Differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes on CT and MRI. AJR 2013; 201:347–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenkrantz AB, Sekhar A, Genega EM, et al. Prognostic implications of the magnetic resonance imaging appearance in papillary renal cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2013; 23:579–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurel S, Narra V, Elsayes KM, Siegel CL, Chen ZE, Brown JJ. Subtypes of renal cell carcinoma:MRI and pathological features. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013; 19:304–311

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vikram R, Ng CS, Tamboli P, et al. Papillary renal cell carcinoma: radiologic-pathologic correlation and spectrum of disease. Radio Graphics 2009; 29:741–754; discussion, 755–747

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yoshimitsu K, Kakihara D, Irie H, et al. Papillary renal carcinoma: diagnostic approach by chemical shift gradient-echo and echo-planar MR imaging.J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 23:339–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck SD, Patel MI, Snyder ME, et al. Effect of papillary and chromophobe cell type on disease free survival after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11:71–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamashita S, Ioritani N, Oikawa K, Aizawa M, Endoh M, Arai Y. Morphological subtyping of papillary renal cell carcinoma: clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis. Int J Urol 2007;14:679–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Waldert M, Haitel A, Marberger M, et al. Comparison of type I and II papillary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and clear cell RCC. BJU Int 2008;102:1381–1384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada T, Endo M, Tsuboi M, et al. Differentiation of pathologic subtypes of papillary renal cell carcinoma on CT. AJR 2008; 191:1559–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ng F, Kozarski R, Ganeshan B, Goh V. Assessment of tumor heterogeneity by CT texture analysis: can the largest cross-sectional area be used as an alternative to whole tumor analysis? Eur J Radiol 2013; 82:342–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Miles KA, Ganeshan B, Hayball MP (2013) CT texture analysis using the filtration-histogram method: what do the measurements mean? Cancer Imaging 13:400–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganeshan B,GohV, MandevilleHC,NgQS, HoskinPJ, Miles KA (2013) Non-small cell lung cancer: histopathologic correlates for texture parameters at CT. Radiology 266:326–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goh V, Ganeshan B, Nathan P, Juttla JK, Vinayan A, Miles KA (2011) Assessment of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell cancer: CT texture as a predictive biomarker. Radiology 261:165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu H, Scalera J, Khalid M et al (2017) Texture analysis as a radiomic marker for differentiating renal tumors. Abdom Radiol (NY)

  18. Raman SP,Chen Y, Schroeder JL, Huang P, Fishman EK(2014)CT texture analysis of renal masses: pilot study using random forest classification for prediction of pathology. Acad Radiol 21:1587–1596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang GM, Shi B, Xue HD,et al. Can quantitative CT texture analysis be used to differentiate subtypes of renal cell carcinoma? Clin Radiol. 2019 Apr;74(4):287-294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deng Y, Soule E , Samuel A,et al. CT texture analysis in the differentiation of major renal cell carcinoma subtypes and correlation with Fuhrman grade. Eur Radiol. 2019 Dec;29(12):6922-6929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vendrami CL, Velichko YS, Miller FH, et al. Differentiation of Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes on MRI: Qualitative and Texture Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Dec;211(6):1234-1245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kocak B, Yardimci AH, Bektas CT, et al. Textural differences between renal cell carcinoma subtypes: Machine learning-based quantitative computed tomography texture analysis with independent external validation. Eur J Radiol. 2018 Oct;107:149-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Low G, Huang G, Fu W, Moloo Z, Girgis S. Review of renal cell carcinoma and its common subtypes in radiology. World J Radiol 2016; 8:484–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yip C, Davnall F, Kozarski R,et al(2015)Assessment of changes in tumor heterogeneity following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary esophageal cancer. Dis Esophagus 28:172–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leng S, Takahashi N, Gomez Cardona D et al (2017) Subjective and objective heterogeneity scores for differentiating small renal masses using contrast-enhanced CT. Abdom Radiol (NY) 42: 1485–1492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen F, Huhdanpaa H, Desai B et al (2015) Whole lesion quantitative CT evaluation of renal cell carcinoma: differentiation of clear cell from papillary renal cell carcinoma. Springer plus 4:66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lubner MG, Stabo N, Abel EJ, Del Rio AM, Pickhardt PJ (2016) CT textural analysis of large primary renal cell carcinomas: pretreatment tumor heterogeneity correlates with histologic findings and clinical outcomes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Vickers A, Elkin E: Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making 2006, 26(6):565-574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rousson V, Zumbrunn T. Decision curve analysis revisited: overall net benefit, relationships to ROC curve analysis, and application to case-control studies. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 Jun 22; 11:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-11-45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiaoming Zhou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duan, C., Li, N., Niu, L. et al. CT texture analysis for the differentiation of papillary renal cell carcinoma subtypes. Abdom Radiol 45, 3860–3868 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02588-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02588-2

Keywords

Navigation