Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of liver regeneration in recipients after living-donor liver transplantation in using preoperative CT texture analysis and clinical features

  • Hepatobiliary
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 06 July 2020

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 07 May 2020

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study is to predict the rate of liver regeneration in recipients after living-donor liver transplantation using preoperative CT texture and shape analysis of the future graft.

Methods

102 donor–recipient pairs who underwent living-donor liver transplantation using right lobe grafts were retrospectively included. We semi-automatically segmented the future graft from preoperative CT. The volume of the future graft (LVpre) was measured, and texture and shape analyses were performed. The graft liver was segmented from postoperative follow-up CT and the volume of the graft (LVpost) was measured. The regeneration index was defined by the following equation: [(LVpost−LVpre)/LVpre] × 100(%). We performed a stepwise, multivariate linear regression analysis to investigate the association between clinical, texture and shape parameters and the RI and to make the best-fit predictive model.

Results

The mean regeneration index was 47.5 ± 38.6%. In univariate analysis, the volume of the future graft, energy, effective diameter, surface area, sphericity, roundnessm, compactness1, and grey-level co-occurrence matrix contrast as well as several clinical parameters were significantly associated with the regeneration index (p < 0.05). The best-fit predictive model for the regeneration index made by multivariate analysis was as follows: Regeneration index (%) = 127.020–0.367 × effective diameter − 1.827 × roundnessm + 47.371 × recipient body surface area (m2) + 12.041 × log(recipient white blood cell count) (× 103/μL)+ 18.034 (if the donor was female).

Conclusion

The effective diameter and roundnessm of the future graft were associated with liver regeneration. Preoperative CT texture analysis of future grafts can be useful for predicting liver regeneration in recipients after living-donor liver transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

LDLT:

Living-donor liver transplantation

CTTA:

CT texture analysis

LC:

Liver cirrhosis

HBV:

Hepatitis B virus

LVpre :

Volume of the future graft

GLCM:

Gray-level co-occurrence matrix

LVpost :

Volume of the transplanted liver

RI:

Regeneration index

GRWR:

Graft-to-recipient weight ratio

rWBC:

White blood cell count of the recipient

rBSA:

Recipient body surface area

References

  1. Lee S, Moon D, Hwang S, Ahn C, Kim K, Song G, Jung D, Ha T, Park G, Jung B (2015) Liver transplantation in Korea: past, present, and future. Transplant Proc 47 (3):705–708

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim W, Lake J, Smith J, Schladt D, Skeans M, Harper A, Wainright J, Snyder J, Israni A, Kasiske B (2018) OPTN/SRTR 2016 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant 18:172–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hashikura Y, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, Matsunami H, Ikegami T, Nakazawa Y, Kiyosawa K, Ichida T (1994) Successful living-related partial liver transplantation to an adult patient. The Lancet 343 (8907):1233-1234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taner CB, Dayangac M, Akin B, Balci D, Uraz S, Duran C, Killi R, Ayanoglu O, Yuzer Y, Tokat Y (2008) Donor safety and remnant liver volume in living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 14 (8):1174-1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shi Z-R, Yan L-N, Du C-Y (2012) Donor safety and remnant liver volume in living donor liver transplantation. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG 18 (48):7327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ma KW, Wong KHC, Chan ACY, Cheung TT, Dai WC, Fung JYY, She WH, Lo CM, Chok KSH (2019) Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis. World journal of gastroenterology 25 (36):5559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Takahashi K, Nagai S, Collins KM, Safwan M, Rizzari MD, Schnickel GT, Yoshida A, Abouljoud MS (2019) Factors associated with low graft regeneration in the early phase after living donor liver transplantation. Clinical transplantation 33 (10):e13690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Singh AK, Cronin CG, Verma HA, Boland GW, Saini S, Mueller PR, Sahani DV (2011) Imaging of preoperative liver transplantation in adults: what radiologists should know. Radiographics 31 (4):1017-1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Davnall F, Yip CS, Ljungqvist G, Selmi M, Ng F, Sanghera B, Ganeshan B, Miles KA, Cook GJ, Goh V (2012) Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice? Insights into imaging 3 (6):573-589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lubner MG, Smith AD, Sandrasegaran K, Sahani DV, Pickhardt PJ (2017) CT texture analysis: definitions, applications, biologic correlates, and challenges. Radiographics 37 (5):1483-1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bayanati H, Thornhill RE, Souza CA, Sethi-Virmani V, Gupta A, Maziak D, Amjadi K, Dennie C (2015) Quantitative CT texture and shape analysis: can it differentiate benign and malignant mediastinal lymph nodes in patients with primary lung cancer? Eur Radiol 25 (2):480–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dhara AK, Mukhopadhyay S, Dutta A, Garg M, Khandelwal N (2016) A combination of shape and texture features for classification of pulmonary nodules in lung CT images. J Digit Imaging 29 (4):466–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daginawala N, Li B, Buch K, Yu H, Tischler B, Qureshi MM, Soto JA, Anderson S (2016) Using texture analyses of contrast enhanced CT to assess hepatic fibrosis. Eur J Radiol 85 (3):511–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lubner MG, Malecki K, Kloke J, Ganeshan B, Pickhardt PJ (2017) Texture analysis of the liver at MDCT for assessing hepatic fibrosis. Abdom Radiol 42 (8):2069–2078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Simpson AL, Adams LB, Allen PJ, D’Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Fong Y, Kingham TP, Leung U, Miga MI, Parada EP Jarnagin WR, Do RK (2015) Texture analysis of preoperative CT images for prediction of postoperative hepatic insufficiency: a preliminary study. J Am Coll Surg 220 (3):339–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim J-E, Kim JH, Park SJ, Choi S-Y, Yi N-J, Han JK (2019) Prediction of liver remnant regeneration after living donor liver transplantation using preoperative CT texture analysis. Abdom Radiol 44 (5):1785–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Olthoff KM (2003) Hepatic regeneration in living donor liver transplantation. Liver transplantation 9 (10C):S35-S41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Taki-Eldin A, Zhou L, Xie H-Y, Zheng S-S (2012) Liver regeneration after liver transplantation. European Surgical Research 48 (3):139-153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Abu Rmilah A, Zhou W, Nelson E, Lin L, Amiot B, Nyberg SL (2019) Understanding the marvels behind liver regeneration. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Developmental Biology 8 (3):e340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilgenkrantz H, de l'Hortet AC (2018) Understanding liver regeneration: from mechanisms to regenerative medicine. The American journal of pathology 188 (6):1316-1327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Boykov Y, Funka-Lea G (2006) Graph cuts and efficient ND image segmentation. International journal of computer vision 70 (2):109-131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Boykov YY, Jolly M-P (2001) Interactive graph cuts for optimal boundary & region segmentation of objects in ND images. In: Proceedings eighth IEEE international conference on computer vision, pp 105–112

  23. Kianmanesh R, Piardi T, Tamby E, Parvanescu A, Bruno O, Palladino E, Bouché O, Msika S, Sommacale D (2013) Liver angulometry: a simple method to estimate liver volume and ratios. HPB 15 (12):976-984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ozaki K, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Minami T, Kitao A, Gabata T (2016) Morphometric changes in liver cirrhosis: aetiological differences correlated with progression. The British journal of radiology 89 (1059):20150896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ozaki K, Matsui O, Kobayashi S, Sanada J, Koda W, Minami T, Kawai K, Gabata T (2010) Selective atrophy of the middle hepatic venous drainage area in hepatitis C-related cirrhotic liver: morphometric study by using multidetector CT. Radiology 257 (3):705–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nagasue N, Yukaya H, Ogawa Y, Kohno H, Nakamura T (1987) Human liver regeneration after major hepatic resection. A study of normal liver and livers with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Annals of surgery 206 (1):30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyazaki S, Takasaki K, Yamamoto M, Tsugita M, Otsubo T (1999) Liver regeneration and restoration of liver function after partial hepatectomy: the relation of fibrosis of the liver parenchyma. Hepato-gastroenterology 46 (29):2919-2924

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Iguchi T, Sato S, Kouno Y, Okumura Y, Akaki S, Tsuda T, Kobayashi K, Kanazawa S, Hiraki Y (2003) Comparison of Tc-99m-GSA scintigraphy with hepatic fibrosis and regeneration in patients with hepatectomy. Annals of nuclear medicine 17 (3):227-233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Tamura S, Imamura H, Kokudo N, Makuuchi M (2006) Regeneration and function of hemiliver graft: right versus left. Surgery 139 (6):765-772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nishizaki T, Ikegami T, Hiroshige S, Hashimoto K, Uchiyama H, Yoshizumi T, Kishikawa K, Shimada M, Sugimachi K (2001) Small graft for living donor liver transplantation. Annals of surgery 233 (4):575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kiuchi T, Kasahara M, Uryuhara K, Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, Egawa H, Fujita S, Hayashi M, Tanaka K (1999) Impact of graft size mismatching on graft prognosis in liver transplantation from living donors1, 2. Transplantation 67 (2):321-327

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Lo C-M, Fan S-T, Liu C-L, Chan JK, Lam BK, Lau GK, Wei WI, Wong J (1999) Minimum graft size for successful living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation 68 (8):1112-1116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Imamura H, Dowaki S, Mizuta K, Kawarasaki H, Hashizume K (2001) Small-for-size grafts in living-related liver transplantation. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 192 (4):510-513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Haga J, Shimazu M, Wakabayashi G, Tanabe M, Kawachi S, Fuchimoto Y, Hoshino K, Morikawa Y, Kitajima M, Kitagawa Y (2008) Liver regeneration in donors and adult recipients after living donor liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation 14 (12):1718-1724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kamel IR, Erbay N, Warmbrand G, Kruskal J, Pomfret E, Raptopoulos V (2003) Liver regeneration after living adult right lobe transplantation. Abdominal imaging 28 (1):0053-0057

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Markose D, Kirkland P, Ramachandran P, Henderson N (2018) Immune cell regulation of liver regeneration and repair. Journal of Immunology and Regenerative Medicine 2:1-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Selzner N, Selzner M, Odermatt B, Tian Y, van Rooijen N, Clavien PA (2003) ICAM-1 triggers liver regeneration through leukocyte recruitment and Kupffer cell-dependent release of TNF-α/IL-6 in mice. Gastroenterology 124 (3):692-700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Olthoff KM, Emond JC, Shearon TH, Everson G, Baker TB, Fisher RA, Freise CE, Gillespie BW, Everhart JE (2015) Liver regeneration after living donor transplantation: Adult‐to‐adult living donor liver transplantation cohort study. Liver Transplantation 21 (1):79-88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Urata K, Kawasaki S, Matsunami H, Hashikura Y, Ikegami T, Ishizone S, Momose Y, Komiyama A, Makuuchi M (1995) Calculation of child and adult standard liver volume for liver transplantation. Hepatology 21 (5):1317-1321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Heinemann A, Wischhusen F, Püschel K, Rogiers X (1999) Standard liver volume in the Caucasian population. Liver transplantation and surgery 5 (5):366-368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Bonnie Hami, MA (USA) for her editorial assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. Thanks to Juhee Lee, Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea, for assistance with statistical analysis.

Funding

No grant support has been received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jung Hoon Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

All authors confirm that no disclosure of potential conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

Our institutional review board (Seoul National University Hospital Institutional Review Board) approved this study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study (IRB No. 1902–090-1010).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, J., Kim, J.H., Kim, JE. et al. Prediction of liver regeneration in recipients after living-donor liver transplantation in using preoperative CT texture analysis and clinical features. Abdom Radiol 45, 3763–3774 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02518-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02518-2

Keywords

Navigation