Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate effectiveness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the peripancreatic lymphadenopathy to differentiate tuberculous lymphadenopathy from metastatic lymphadenopathy.
Materials and methods
Twenty-nine patients with 65 peripancreatic necrotic tuberculous lymphadenopathy and 31 patients with 47 peripancreatic necrotic metastatic lymphadenopathy from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were included in this study. MRI features in the T1-weighted image (WI), T2WI, and diffusion-weighted image were analyzed. The ADC values of necrotic and non-necrotic portions of the lymph nodes were measured and compared using t test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to obtain the optimal ADC threshold value and diagnostic accuracy for differentiating tuberculous lymphadenopathy from metastatic lymphadenopathy.
Results
On T2WI, the signal intensity of necrotic portions was variable in tuberculous lymphadenopathy, but was mostly high in metastatic lymphadenopathy. The mean ADCs of necrotic portions of tuberculous lymphadenopathy were significantly lower than those of metastatic lymphadenopathy ([0.919 ± 0.272] × 10−3 mm2/s vs. [1.553 ± 0.406] × 10−3 mm2/s, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis for differentiating tuberculous from metastatic lymphadenopathy demonstrated an area under the curve for the ADC values of necrotic portions of 0.929 (95% CI, 0.865–0.969) with an ADC threshold of 1.022. The sensitivity and specificity for the differentiation of tuberculous from metastatic lymphadenopathy were 80.0% and 97.8%, respectively.
Conclusion
The ADC values of necrotic portions of peripancreatic lymphadenopathy may be useful for differentiating tuberculous from metastatic lymphadenopathy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ADC:
-
Apparent diffusion coefficient
- AFB:
-
Acid-fast bacilli
- AUC:
-
Area under the curve
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- DWI:
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging
- EUS:
-
Endoscopic ultrasonography
- FNA:
-
Fine needle aspiration
- MRI:
-
Magnetic resonance imaging
- PCR:
-
Polymerase chain reaction
- PDAC:
-
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- PET:
-
Positron emission tomography
- ROC:
-
Receiver operating characteristic
- ROI:
-
Region of interest
- SI:
-
Signal intensity
- T1WI:
-
T1-weighted imaging
- T2WI:
-
T2-weighted imaging
References
Kim SY, Kim MJ, Chung JJ, et al. (2014) Abdominal tuberculous lymphadenopathy: MR imaging findings. Abdominal Imaging 25:627-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002610000120
Zhang Y, Chen J, Shen J, et al. (2013) Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy. Clin Radiol 68:224-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.04.002.
Haberal I, Celik H, Gocmen H, Akmansu H, Yoruk M, Ozeri C (2004) Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:197-201.
Watanabe Y, Kusumoto M, Yoshida A, et al. (2016) Cavity Wall Thickness in Solitary Cavitary Lung Adenocarcinomas Is a Prognostic Indicator. Ann Thorac Surg 102:1863-1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.121.
Nagar AM, Raut AA, Morani AC, et al. (2009) Pancreatic tuberculosis: a clinical and imaging review of 32 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:136-141. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0b013e31816c82bc.
Shao H, Yang ZG, Deng W, et al. (2012) Tuberculosis versus lymphoma in the abdominal lymph nodes: a comparative study using contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol 81:2513-2517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.004.
De Backer AI, Mortele KJ, Deeren D, et al. (2005) Abdominal tuberculous lymphadenopathy: MRI features. Eur Radiol 15:2104-2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2745-6.
Shao H, Yang ZG, Xu GH, et al. (2013) Tuberculosis in the abdominal lymph nodes: evaluation with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 17:90-95. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.12.0115.
Lee JH, Han SS, Hong EK, et al. (2019) Predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatobiliary cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective analysis. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.007.
Dasgupta S, Chakrabarti S, Sarkar S (2017) Shifting trend of tubercular lymphadenitis over a decade - A study from eastern region of India. Biomed J 40:284-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2017.08.001.
Krishna S, Kalra N, Singh P, et al. (2016) Small-Bowel Tuberculosis: A Comparative Study of MR Enterography and Small-Bowel Follow-Through. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:571-577. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.15.15580.
Sharma V, Rana SS, Kumar A, Bhasin DK (2016) Pancreatic tuberculosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:310-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13174.
Gupta RK, Kathuria MK, Pradhan S (1999) Magnetization transfer MR imaging in CNS tuberculosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:867-875.
Kioumehr F, Dadsetan MR, Rooholamini SA, Au A (1994) Central nervous system tuberculosis: MRI. Neuroradiology 36:93-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00588067.
Peprah KO, Andronikou S, Goussard P (2012) Characteristic magnetic resonance imaging low T2 signal intensity of necrotic lung parenchyma in children with pulmonary tuberculosis. J Thorac Imaging 27:171-174. https://doi.org/10.1097/rti.0b013e318211abfb.
Arai J, Kitamura K, Yamamiya A, et al. (2017) Peripancreatic Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Diagnosed via Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration and Polymerase Chain Reaction. Intern Med 56:1049-1052. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7509.
Hiwatashi A, Kinoshita T, Moritani T, et al. (2003) Hypointensity on Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Brain Related to T2 Shortening and Susceptibility Effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1705-1709. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811705.
Acknowledgements
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
None.
Ethical approval
Our institutional review board approved this retrospective observational study and waived the requirement for informed consent.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huh, J., Byun, J.H., Kim, J.H. et al. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating peripancreatic tuberculous lymphadenopathy from metastatic lymphadenopathy. Abdom Radiol 45, 3163–3171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02501-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02501-x