Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Value of apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating peripancreatic tuberculous lymphadenopathy from metastatic lymphadenopathy

  • Pancreas
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate effectiveness of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the peripancreatic lymphadenopathy to differentiate tuberculous lymphadenopathy from metastatic lymphadenopathy.

Materials and methods

Twenty-nine patients with 65 peripancreatic necrotic tuberculous lymphadenopathy and 31 patients with 47 peripancreatic necrotic metastatic lymphadenopathy from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, who underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), were included in this study. MRI features in the T1-weighted image (WI), T2WI, and diffusion-weighted image were analyzed. The ADC values of necrotic and non-necrotic portions of the lymph nodes were measured and compared using t test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to obtain the optimal ADC threshold value and diagnostic accuracy for differentiating tuberculous lymphadenopathy from metastatic lymphadenopathy.

Results

On T2WI, the signal intensity of necrotic portions was variable in tuberculous lymphadenopathy, but was mostly high in metastatic lymphadenopathy. The mean ADCs of necrotic portions of tuberculous lymphadenopathy were significantly lower than those of metastatic lymphadenopathy ([0.919 ± 0.272] × 10−3 mm2/s vs. [1.553 ± 0.406] × 10−3 mm2/s, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis for differentiating tuberculous from metastatic lymphadenopathy demonstrated an area under the curve for the ADC values of necrotic portions of 0.929 (95% CI, 0.865–0.969) with an ADC threshold of 1.022. The sensitivity and specificity for the differentiation of tuberculous from metastatic lymphadenopathy were 80.0% and 97.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

The ADC values of necrotic portions of peripancreatic lymphadenopathy may be useful for differentiating tuberculous from metastatic lymphadenopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ADC:

Apparent diffusion coefficient

AFB:

Acid-fast bacilli

AUC:

Area under the curve

CT:

Computed tomography

DWI:

Diffusion-weighted imaging

EUS:

Endoscopic ultrasonography

FNA:

Fine needle aspiration

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

PDAC:

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

PET:

Positron emission tomography

ROC:

Receiver operating characteristic

ROI:

Region of interest

SI:

Signal intensity

T1WI:

T1-weighted imaging

T2WI:

T2-weighted imaging

References

  1. Kim SY, Kim MJ, Chung JJ, et al. (2014) Abdominal tuberculous lymphadenopathy: MR imaging findings. Abdominal Imaging 25:627-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002610000120

  2. Zhang Y, Chen J, Shen J, et al. (2013) Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy. Clin Radiol 68:224-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2011.04.002.

  3. Haberal I, Celik H, Gocmen H, Akmansu H, Yoruk M, Ozeri C (2004) Which is important in the evaluation of metastatic lymph nodes in head and neck cancer: palpation, ultrasonography, or computed tomography. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 130:197-201.

  4. Watanabe Y, Kusumoto M, Yoshida A, et al. (2016) Cavity Wall Thickness in Solitary Cavitary Lung Adenocarcinomas Is a Prognostic Indicator. Ann Thorac Surg 102:1863-1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.121.

  5. Nagar AM, Raut AA, Morani AC, et al. (2009) Pancreatic tuberculosis: a clinical and imaging review of 32 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33:136-141. https://doi.org/10.1097/rct.0b013e31816c82bc.

  6. Shao H, Yang ZG, Deng W, et al. (2012) Tuberculosis versus lymphoma in the abdominal lymph nodes: a comparative study using contrast-enhanced MRI. Eur J Radiol 81:2513-2517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.11.004.

  7. De Backer AI, Mortele KJ, Deeren D, et al. (2005) Abdominal tuberculous lymphadenopathy: MRI features. Eur Radiol 15:2104-2109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2745-6.

  8. Shao H, Yang ZG, Xu GH, et al. (2013) Tuberculosis in the abdominal lymph nodes: evaluation with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 17:90-95. https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.12.0115.

  9. Lee JH, Han SS, Hong EK, et al. (2019) Predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatobiliary cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective analysis. Eur J Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.04.007.

  10. Dasgupta S, Chakrabarti S, Sarkar S (2017) Shifting trend of tubercular lymphadenitis over a decade - A study from eastern region of India. Biomed J 40:284-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bj.2017.08.001.

  11. Krishna S, Kalra N, Singh P, et al. (2016) Small-Bowel Tuberculosis: A Comparative Study of MR Enterography and Small-Bowel Follow-Through. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207:571-577. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.15.15580.

  12. Sharma V, Rana SS, Kumar A, Bhasin DK (2016) Pancreatic tuberculosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 31:310-318. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.13174.

  13. Gupta RK, Kathuria MK, Pradhan S (1999) Magnetization transfer MR imaging in CNS tuberculosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:867-875.

  14. Kioumehr F, Dadsetan MR, Rooholamini SA, Au A (1994) Central nervous system tuberculosis: MRI. Neuroradiology 36:93-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00588067.

  15. Peprah KO, Andronikou S, Goussard P (2012) Characteristic magnetic resonance imaging low T2 signal intensity of necrotic lung parenchyma in children with pulmonary tuberculosis. J Thorac Imaging 27:171-174. https://doi.org/10.1097/rti.0b013e318211abfb.

  16. Arai J, Kitamura K, Yamamiya A, et al. (2017) Peripancreatic Tuberculous Lymphadenitis Diagnosed via Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration and Polymerase Chain Reaction. Intern Med 56:1049-1052. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.56.7509.

  17. Hiwatashi A, Kinoshita T, Moritani T, et al. (2003) Hypointensity on Diffusion-Weighted MRI of the Brain Related to T2 Shortening and Susceptibility Effects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 181:1705-1709. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811705.

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae Ho Byun.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical approval

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective observational study and waived the requirement for informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huh, J., Byun, J.H., Kim, J.H. et al. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating peripancreatic tuberculous lymphadenopathy from metastatic lymphadenopathy. Abdom Radiol 45, 3163–3171 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02501-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02501-x

Keywords

Navigation