Skip to main content
Log in

Small (< 4 cm) Bosniak renal cysts: association of initial fluid percentage and enhancing solid volume thresholds with future lesion behavior

  • Kidneys, Ureters, Bladder, Retroperitoneum
  • Published:
Abdominal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Evaluate the fluid percentage (FP) and enhancing solid volume (SV) of small (< 4 cm) Bosniak 2F, 3 and 4 renal lesions and the association with Bosniak category at baseline and follow-up.

Methods

Hospital database was searched from 1/1/2010 to 8/3/2018 for small (< 4 cm) Bosniak 2F, 3 and 4 lesions studied with initial and follow-up C+CT/MRI. Two radiologists blindly assigned Bosniak categories to first and last available studies. One radiologist performed volumetric analysis of each lesion, calculating the FP and SV. Association with Bosniak category was explored.

Results

121 patients (84:37 M:F) were identified with 136 renal lesions (84, 37 and 15 Bosniak category 2F, 3 and 4) and followed for 1–12.3 years (mean 3.5 years). 87% (73/84) of 2F lesions were downgraded or remained stable. 48% (25/52) of 3/4 lesions were downgraded. Higher FP was associated with a lower Bosniak category (p value = 0.0042). Increase in FP was associated with the probability of being downgraded on follow-up (OR 1.03, p value = 0.0036), while increase in fluid volume of lesion was directly associated with change in overall lesion size among lesions that were downgraded (b-estimate = 0.03, p value = 0.0003). All Bosniak 3/4 lesions with initial SV less than 0.05 cc were downgraded.

Conclusion

FP and SV are useful quantitative surrogates for Bosniak category and future behavior, respectively. Growth of small renal lesions by an increase in fluid volume and FP leads to a downgrade in Bosniak category. Initial SV less than 0.05 cc in Bosniak 3/4 lesions suggests possible future downgrade.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME, Bass EB, Cadeddu JA, Chang A, Clark PE, Davis BJ, Derweesh IH, Giambarresi L, Gervais DA, Hu SL, Lane BR, Leibovich BC, Pierorazio PM: Renal Mass and Localized Renal Cancer: AUA Guideline. The Journal of urology 2017, 198:520-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Schoots IG, Zaccai K, Hunink MG, Verhagen P: Bosniak Classification for Complex Renal Cysts Reevaluated: A Systematic Review. The Journal of urology 2017, 198:12-21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Huber J, Winkler A, Jakobi H, Bruckner T, Roth W, Hallscheidt P, Daneshvar K, Hohenfellner M, Pahernik S: Preoperative decision making for renal cell carcinoma: cystic morphology in cross-sectional imaging might predict lower malignant potential. Urologic oncology 2014, 32:37 e1-6

    Google Scholar 

  4. Israel GM, Hindman N, Bosniak MA: Evaluation of cystic renal masses: comparison of CT and MR imaging by using the Bosniak classification system. Radiology 2004, 231:365-71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moch H: Cystic renal tumors: new entities and novel concepts. Advances in anatomic pathology 2010, 17:209-14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Malley RL, Godoy G, Hecht EM, Stifelman MD, Taneja SS: Bosniak category IIF designation and surgery for complex renal cysts. The Journal of urology 2009, 182:1091-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Belldegrun AS: The changing natural history of renal cell carcinoma. The Journal of urology 2001, 166:1611-23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Park HS, Lee K, Moon KC: Determination of the cutoff value of the proportion of cystic change for prognostic stratification of clear cell renal cell carcinoma. The Journal of urology 2011, 186:423-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JJ, Jeong BC, Kim CK, Seo SI, Carriere KC, Kim M, Park BK, Jeon SS, Lee HM, Choi HY: Postoperative Outcome of Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma Defined on Preoperative Imaging: A Retrospective Study. The Journal of urology 2016.

  10. Pruthi DK, Liu Q, Kirkpatrick IDC, Gelfond J, Drachenberg DE: Long-Term Surveillance of Complex Cystic Renal Masses and Heterogeneity of Bosniak 3 Lesions. The Journal of urology 2018.

  11. Sevcenco S, Spick C, Helbich TH, Heinz G, Shariat SF, Klingler HC, Rauchenwald M, Baltzer PA: Malignancy rates and diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification for the diagnosis of cystic renal lesions in computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis. European radiology 2016.

  12. Smith AD, Remer EM, Cox KL, Lieber ML, Allen BC, Shah SN, Herts BR: Bosniak category IIF and III cystic renal lesions: outcomes and associations. Radiology 2012, 262:152-60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Winters BR, Gore JL, Holt SK, Harper JD, Lin DW, Wright JL: Cystic renal cell carcinoma carries an excellent prognosis regardless of tumor size. Urologic oncology 2015, 33:505 e9-13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bosniak MA: The current radiological approach to renal cysts. Radiology 1986, 158:1-10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bosniak MA: Problems in the radiologic diagnosis of renal parenchymal tumors. The Urologic clinics of North America 1993, 20:217-30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bosniak MA: The Bosniak renal cyst classification: 25 years later. Radiology 2012, 262:781-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Silverman SG, Pedrosa I, Ellis JH, Hindman NM, Schieda N, Smith AD, Remer EM, Shinagare AB, Curci NE, Raman SS, Wells SA, Kaffenberger SD, Wang ZJ, Chandarana H, Davenport MS: Bosniak Classification of Cystic Renal Masses, Version 2019: An Update Proposal and Needs Assessment. Radiology 2019, 292:475-88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Israel GM, Bosniak MA: Pitfalls in renal mass evaluation and how to avoid them. Radiographics 2008, 28:1325-38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaish H, Ahmed F, Schreiber J, Hindman NM: Active Surveillance of Small (< 4 cm) Bosniak Category 2F, 3, and 4 Renal Lesions: What Happens on Imaging Follow-Up? AJR American journal of roentgenology 2019:1-8

  20. Hanson JA, Ason R, Weinreb J, Van Dyke A, Mitchell KA: Radiology estimates of viable tumor percentage in hepatocellular carcinoma ablation cavities correlate poorly with pathology assessment. Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 2013, 137:392-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Terada N, Arai Y, Kinukawa N, Terai A: The 10-year natural history of simple renal cysts. Urology 2008, 71:7-11; discussion -2

  22. Smith AD, Allen BC, Sanyal R, Carson JD, Zhang H, Williams JH, Collins C, Griswold M, Zhang X: Outcomes and complications related to the management of Bosniak cystic renal lesions. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2015, 204:W550-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mousessian PN, Yamauchi FI, Mussi TC, Baroni RH: Malignancy Rate, Histologic Grade, and Progression of Bosniak Category III and IV Complex Renal Cystic Lesions. AJR American journal of roentgenology 2017, 209:1285-90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hindman NM: Approach to Very Small (< 1.5 cm) Cystic Renal Lesions: Ignore, Observe, or Treat? AJR American journal of roentgenology 2015, 204:1182-9

  25. Hindman NM, Hecht EM, Bosniak MA: Follow-up for Bosniak category 2F cystic renal lesions. Radiology 2014, 272:757-66

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiram Shaish.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaish, H., Ahmed, F., Schreiber, J. et al. Small (< 4 cm) Bosniak renal cysts: association of initial fluid percentage and enhancing solid volume thresholds with future lesion behavior. Abdom Radiol 45, 799–806 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02413-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02413-w

Keywords

Navigation